MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 02-12-2001, 12:27 PM   #1
sgwinn
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 84
Post Cat back systems

I'm trying to decide between Flomaster II or III chamber cat back systems, or Dynomax Ultra flow's. I've read Dynomax produces a little more HP. How about the sound? I'm looking for more sound than stock, but not real loud. Anybody compare these two brands for sound? thanks. Stan
sgwinn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2001, 07:48 PM   #2
DemonGT
Registered Member
 
DemonGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 879
Post

i went with the Mac cat back...sounds awsome

------------------
1991 GT,T-5,air silencer removed,racing clutch(previous owner put in so dont know what kind),K&N air filter,Aiwa deck,power acoustic amp,2 12" pianeers,UPDATE: Just got my Mac long tube headers and Cat-back

By the time summer comes ill have full Mac exhaust,new shifter knob and what ever else i can afford
DemonGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2001, 08:11 PM   #3
LincoConti87
Registered Member
 
LincoConti87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tallahassee,Florida,USA
Posts: 188
Lightbulb

I'm kinda thinking the same thing. Not quite a mustang yet but my lincoln could use a dual exhaust. Alot of people have 2 chambers for sale. On the flowmaster website they talk about their products and they have a very basic bargraph that basically states they make noticeable noise inside the car whereas the 3 chambers don't make too much. I really wanna get some 3 chambers but I can't afford anything new so I may have to go with the 2's

------------------
Rob meister
89 Mercedes 190E 2.6
87 Lincoln Continental 5.0
Ex 86 Mercury Cougar
with anemic 3.8

LincoConti87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2001, 10:44 PM   #4
Unit 5302
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
Thumbs up

I have Dynomax Super Turbo's. The Ultraflows are louder I believe. Right now, I'd choose the Flomaster Delta flows. They move the resonance up to the 3000rpm area, instead of the 2000 area. Much better!
Unit 5302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2001, 03:11 AM   #5
chris91LX
Registered Member
 
chris91LX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Suburban Chicago, Hanover Park
Posts: 695
Post

I have the Dynomax Super Turbo cat back and while I like it, I think I might have liked the Flowmaster sound better. The Mac system has the nice chrome tips, and my dynomax has the Stainless tips, not sure about the flowmaster, but I'm sure it's at least stainless. If you got the bucks, I've heard nothing but happy responses from people who have the Borla system, real mellow. If you don't want too loud the 3 chambers are the way to go. My pony sounds mean with the full exhaust, headers, o/r x pipe and cat back, but not obnoxious.

------------------
91 LX 5.0
Z t-5, 3:73 gear, Vortech 73mm Mass Air, Accufab 65mm TB, BBK underdrives, Crane HI-6S Ignition, BBK unequal length headers, Bassani x pipe, 2.5" Dynomax Super Turbo cat back, Kenny Brown Super Subs, Factory Five Control Arms, Mac cold air kit and more to come!
chris91LX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2001, 10:24 AM   #6
98yellow stang
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Erie PA USA
Posts: 38
Post

What ever you do never consider a magnaflow. I have one on my car and I am trying to get warrenty service, because there is almost nothing left of the mufflers and the tailpipes literally fell off. The system just plain does not fit. The only thing it has going for it is that it sounds good. Or I would have myself a MAC or Flowmaster

------------------
My 98 yellow stang

Mods:
Magnaflow cat-back
98yellow stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2001, 11:20 AM   #7
2FastLX
The Photoshop Guru
 
2FastLX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Mecca, Indiana
Posts: 1,419
Post

I love the sound of my MAC and have heard Flows. I think the MAC sounds better IMO.

Here's some MAC clips...
sample1
sample2
sample3
2FastLX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2001, 12:11 PM   #8
Green92LX
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: North Haven,CT
Posts: 336
Post

GET THE MAC....YOU'LL FALL IN LOVE WITH YOUR CAR ALL OVER AGAIN!!!!!!! The only reason I have the flowturds on my coupe still is because in doing the car now, and I had the flow$hits hangin around....yuck

------------------
1992 5.0 LX, Edelbrock 6037 Heads, Cobra Intake,E-303, 1.6 Roller Rockers,65MM Holley TB, 75 MM Pro M Mass Air, 190 LPH FP w/ 24 lb injectors,BBK equal length shorties,offroad h-pipe,Mac Flowpath Mufflers, Pro 5.0, 3.73's,Motorsport "C" springs,welded subframe connectors, Ponies w/ 225/50 Nittos, 93 Cobra Spoiler

Daily driver: 89 Coupe with 205K plus, BBK shorties,offroad h-pipe,2-chamber flowmasters with dumps, cut and welded stock shifter...and it runs like a champ.
Green92LX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2001, 01:23 PM   #9
Green92LX
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: North Haven,CT
Posts: 336
Post

Hey 2Fast, those clips sound sweet. I couldn't turn em up too loud though cause I'm at work

------------------
1992 5.0 LX, Edelbrock 6037 Heads, Cobra Intake,E-303, 1.6 Roller Rockers,65MM Holley TB, 75 MM Pro M Mass Air, 190 LPH FP w/ 24 lb injectors,BBK equal length shorties,offroad h-pipe,Mac Flowpath Mufflers, Pro 5.0, 3.73's,Motorsport "C" springs,welded subframe connectors, Ponies w/ 225/50 Nittos, 93 Cobra Spoiler

Daily driver: 89 Coupe with 205K plus, BBK shorties,offroad h-pipe,2-chamber flowmasters with dumps, cut and welded stock shifter...and it runs like a champ.
Green92LX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2001, 12:24 PM   #10
sgwinn
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 84
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by 2FastLX:
I love the sound of my MAC and have heard Flows. I think the MAC sounds better IMO.

Here's some MAC clips...
sample1
sample2
sample3
Thanks for the advice. What MAC system did you get exactly? Do they have comparable choices to Flows and Dynomax? Out of three choices, I'd like the medium range sound.
Stan
sgwinn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2001, 04:43 PM   #11
DZEE'S LX
Registered Member
 
DZEE'S LX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 117
Post

I have Dynomax Race Magnums (2 1/2) necked down to my stock 2 1/4 pipes. I picked them because of the supposedly better flow and because I wanted the straight through design.
I did notice a slight bump in power compared to my blown out stock muffs.

The tone the RM's is really nice. They are not very loud though, most likely because of the stock 4-cat setup. They sound really sweet from about 2300 & up. I have minimal 2K highway drone.

I do like load pipes though, gotta love that V-8 sound in our world of rice.

I've been thinking about gutting the two rear cats just to see what happens.
Anybody done this? Results?
Someday I'll have the $$ for a better system but I just want a little more db for now.


------------------
Spec Service (UHP), Paint, 16x7.5 ALBA's w/BFG G-Force KDW's, TC 3.55's w/disks, K Bell Ramair, March pulleys, Race Magnums, D/S loop, MM 4point rollbar, FMS C springs & strut tower brace, Tokico Illuminas, KB welded subs.
DZEE'S LX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2001, 08:56 PM   #12
BowTie Eater 5 Liter
Registered Member
 
BowTie Eater 5 Liter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Maple Ridge B.C. Canada, The Best Place In The World
Posts: 871
Post

I Like the dynomax ultra flo's If ya want a nice sound clip, here it goes. www.dynomax.com/audio/track01.wav

------------------
1988 Mustang GT, T-5
No Smog Pump (Shorty Belt), Dumps At The End Of Stock H-Pipe (Sounds Mean), K&N Air Filter (Stock Air Box, Removed air silendcer), 198.9 rwhp @4200 (235 Motor!!), 285 lbs-ft @2900 (336 Motor!!!).
BowTie Eater 5 Liter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2001, 12:30 PM   #13
sgwinn
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 84
Post

Man the sound clip for the Dynomax Ultra Flow is great. think I'm sold. next question; as you know, the stock muffler is all one piece, including tail pipes. Could I just get the Ultra Flow mufflers and have Midas "cut" out the old muffler only, and weld the mufflers into the existing tail pipe which is still perfect? (saves a buck)
Stan
sgwinn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2001, 01:25 PM   #14
2FastLX
The Photoshop Guru
 
2FastLX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Mecca, Indiana
Posts: 1,419
Post

I'm running MAC long tubes, MAC Pro Chamber crossover, and the MAC cat back. It all bolts together great and as you heard it sounds wicked.
2FastLX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2001, 04:07 PM   #15
DemonGT
Registered Member
 
DemonGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 879
Post

iv never been a big fan of dynomax ...freind of mine has a 88 gt with a 347 and dynomax mufflers...i think it sounds like crap

------------------
1991 GT,T-5,air silencer removed,racing clutch(previous owner put in so dont know what kind),K&N air filter,Aiwa deck,power acoustic amp,2 12" pianeers,UPDATE: Just got my Mac long tube headers and Cat-back

Future Mods:3.73's,Pro 5.0,Shifter knob,FMS 9mm wires
DemonGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I'm back.....And still Crazy. Mercury Blue Oval Lounge 14 10-30-2002 02:41 AM
I'm back, anyone miss me? rustang girl Blue Oval Lounge 18 10-10-2002 11:34 PM
Back in the Game...... 1969Mach1 Blue Oval Lounge 27 10-08-2002 10:56 PM
Back from the Track - Good News/Bad News with Diablo apenn Modular Madness 1 09-22-2002 02:50 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46 PM.


SEARCH