© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
11-27-2008, 06:01 PM | #61 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4
|
Re: 4 vs 8
I just bought a 88 4cly coupe no option car and a 88 tbird turbo coupe ( i got both cars for 800.00)combining the best parts from the tbird and putting them into the mustang should yield a quick fuel effiecent mustang without all the extra weight of the svo, by the way a stock turbo motor will hold over 300 hp. with some added bost keeping up with a stock 5.0 shouldnt be a problem. the goal is to build the mustang and sell off everything else to keep a very small budget
|
07-25-2009, 08:50 PM | #62 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: new york
Posts: 482
|
Re: 4 vs 8
i know this is a old post but ur friend is a retard.when my 5.0 was stock i got better highway millage with the 5.0 then my 2.3.the only 2.3 id but is a turbo one.thats it i mean i cant belive some 1 would actually say that
__________________
347 stroker all forged,arp everything,stud mains w/girdle,7qt pan,full roller, custom cam, aluminum heads swirl valves 5 angle valve job.quick fuel 750,areomotive pump,cobras w/nitto drags,and m/t et drags for the track, ford racing 373 gears,centerforce clutch,tko500,underdrive pulleys,bassani x-pipe,flowmasters ^best et so far 11.6 1.61 60ft coming soon 9sec et's 1992 mustang gt 2001 gmc 1500 4x4 78 century boat 92 skidoo |
|
|