© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
02-28-2004, 10:37 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: baton rouge, la.
Posts: 18
|
351C vs 351W
what are the differences between 351C and 351W? one better than the other?
thanks neil |
02-29-2004, 01:37 AM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 56
|
What are you looking to put the engine into? Both engines can be built into strong performers, if you have the money and resources. The differences are the block, heads, intake, headers...everything they only share displacement. As far as which one is better, a 351W would be cheaper and a lot simpler to fit into a fox or even SN95. The 351W can be done with pre made parts, ie ones that companies make, but the 351C would require alot of custom parts. You could make a 351W with 350-400 hp easy. A 351C on the other hand, depending if you went with 2 or 4 v heads would require reving the engine to 7000+ rpms to get any power. Building a 351C with 4v heads would be a waste in a daily driver, cuse you would have to rev it to the moon to make power, 351 ci is simply not enough to make use of the heads. If you really want to use a 351C, put the 2v Aussi heads on it with the wedge chambers. Any 351C stroker would be good, but would require alot of expensive custome parts. Another route would be to build a 347 stroker. it would be cheaper than any 351 swap.
__________________
351W .030", AFR 185s, Crane roller cam-.543" 220 -.562" 228@.050, TFS 351W EFI intake, Billet Roller Rockers, BBK Long Tubes, BBK X- Pipe, Dynomax Race Magnums w/dumps, 30lb injectors, 190lph intank pump, Holley Adjustable FPR, 75mm TB&MA, Underdrive pulleys, Aluminum Rad, Billet Flywheel, McCloud Clutch, World Class T-5, B&M Ripper Shifter 4.10s, McCreary G-60s, Lakewood 90/10s, Comp. Enginering 3 way adjust/rear, Upper and Lower Control arms, Autometer gauges. |
02-29-2004, 09:04 AM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Willard Ohio
Posts: 60
|
well said 89fast5oh..I thought about the 351C too but what a pain in the $ss. A 460 would be an easier swap than a 351C. I prefer the 351W route, but requires different oil pan and headers than a 302.
__________________
1967 mustang fastback drag car. tube chassis. 468 BBF.. 1989 LX notch 1982 GT 2003 F350 6.0 |
02-29-2004, 10:25 AM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: baton rouge, la.
Posts: 18
|
thanks for the info. i will be placing the engine in a 79 mercury capri. no cleveland for me. thanks again.
neil |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
351W heads on 289 stock engine | sleeperstang | Classic Mustangs | 5 | 11-21-2002 08:35 PM |
NEED HELP ASAP !351W to 351C Swap | IeatZ28 | Classic Mustangs | 2 | 11-06-2001 12:45 AM |
351W or 351C? | A Wild Neg | Windsor Power | 3 | 04-26-2001 03:35 PM |
is there any difference between 351C heads and 351M heads | tireburner163 | Windsor Power | 7 | 03-09-2001 09:26 PM |
351W vs 351C | Five0 | Windsor Power | 2 | 01-26-2001 08:18 PM |