© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
08-07-2002, 04:01 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 157
|
Cold Air Induction
Will Cold Air Induction on a 91 5.0 add some horses? Which is better, BBK or MAC? I am looking to get the fenderwall mount version from BBK. Just wanted to see what you guys thought first, Thanks.
|
08-07-2002, 04:16 PM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Suburban Chicago, Hanover Park
Posts: 695
|
I had the BBK one and sent it back because it didn't fit. I got the Mac one and it fit great. I didn't notice any big difference in HP, but it cleaned up the engine bay real nice. I took it off because I went to the C&L 76mm maf and elbow, and the CAI kit didn't fit the maf and 70mm tb I'm running now.
IMO the Mac fit better and is cheaper.
__________________
My Ford Club http://www.midwestfords.org/ Best time N/A 12.9 @ 107 1.711 60' 125 shot - 12.04 @ 113 1.59 60' |
08-08-2002, 02:44 PM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Raynham, Ma, USA
Posts: 189
|
I have the MAC and never had any problems with it. The install was easy and it definitely cleaned up the bay. I have never had any experience with the BBK but I can tell you that the MAC is a good piece of equipment.
__________________
95 Red Mustang GT Pro 5.0, MAC fenderwall cold air induction kit, BBK Off-Road H-pipe with Magnaflow cat-back system Mostly stock(looking to modify) Rice Haters Club Member #63 |
08-08-2002, 03:01 PM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Amarillo tx
Posts: 10
|
ive got the mac cold air kit too.. and it fit just fine.. i also have a mac shortthrow shifter and its great too.. mac does make some good stuff..
|
08-08-2002, 04:50 PM | #5 |
Mustangs
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,938
|
I've heard better things about the MAC. I have a fenderwell BBK and the fit just isn't quite right. Took a lot of effort to get it on and lined up so that it didn't hit the strut tower.
__________________
2005 Suzuki Hayabusa GSX1300-R 1980 Ford Thunderbird - 255 V8 ported heads, 5.0L ported stock headers, O.R. H-pipe and Flowmaster 2-chambers, dual roller timing chain hi-po Mack Truck hood emblem 1985 Mustang GT 5.0L T5, F-303, GT40p, headers, off-road h, flowmasters, MSD stuff, etc. Sold 02/06/04 1989 Mustang GT ET: 13.304@102.29 mph (5-24-03) Sold - 1998 Mustang Cobra coupe, 1/4 mile - street tires: 13.843@103.41 (bone stock) |
08-08-2002, 05:03 PM | #6 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Arlington Hts. IL
Posts: 315
|
I have a quick ?. Will the Mac Cold air induction work with the C&L76mm?
__________________
90 LX Convertible 5.0 AOD 3.73 Gears, Underdrive Pulleys, TransGo shift kit, A servo, Subframe Connectors, o/r h-pipe, 2 chamber flows, Pony Wheels |
08-08-2002, 06:02 PM | #7 |
Conservative Individualist
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Wherever I need to be
Posts: 7,487
|
CAI
Cold Air Induction is good for the engine and adds a few HP (my Moroso kit claims an honest 3 - 4 HP gain) but don't expect to feel it in the 'butt-dyno'.
Like using high-quality plug wires or a brass-terminal distributor cap, these things help the engine work at peak efficency and combined, can have a cumulative effect on performance but by themselves, they don't make a big difference in overall performance. |
08-09-2002, 07:57 AM | #8 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Suburban Chicago, Hanover Park
Posts: 695
|
Quote:
__________________
My Ford Club http://www.midwestfords.org/ Best time N/A 12.9 @ 107 1.711 60' 125 shot - 12.04 @ 113 1.59 60' |
|
08-09-2002, 09:48 AM | #9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Waukegan
Posts: 12
|
Ok BBK this one is for you... LOL i have a BBK cold air system... I really like it. The intake went on in less than 30 mins. I think i felt a difference but who really knows. My e/t time shows the difference by some what stock i ran a 15.3 and now with everthing listed below it was 14.9... I really would go with the bbk intake i wanna say they are only $150. Decide and let us know.... I was up at the track yesterday....
__________________
~Mike~ 1989 5.0 Slow Notchback 306' ported and polished heads gt-40 intake upper and lower, aeromotive FPR, bbk cold air, 36 LBS injectors, MSD- ignition, T5 Tranny, Aluminum DS, 8.8 3.73 spool rear end, Nitrous Works 175 shot, Mickey Thompson 26x10x15 at 8 LBS. Ran a 11.23 @120.5mph 0-60ft in 1.47 Sold My 1994 |
08-10-2002, 12:02 AM | #10 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: McSherrystown PA (near Gettysburg)
Posts: 26
|
Save yourself some money and just get a K&N Panal "drop in" filter. Same performance gain as CAI but way cheaper.
|
08-10-2002, 09:41 AM | #11 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Rogers, MN
Posts: 2,089
|
Blue GT 5.0 is correct. The stock air box IS a cold air intake already. The thing you really want to get rid of is the pipe between the TB and MAF sensor. The C&L intake pipe is real nice but I have some problems with fitting it correctly. Eliminating the EGR spacer will hopefully fix that for me. My intake is positioned a bit higher because of the 351, so that may have something to do with it. I think it goes for $99. Here's a picture from the C&L web site:
You could also try to fabricate your own tube. Those rubber couplers are a PITA to find, though.
__________________
351W 89 Mustang GT Convertible |
08-10-2002, 01:00 PM | #12 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Goldendale, WA, USA
Posts: 84
|
Save yourself the money and buy the K&N panel filter for the stock airbox. It won't look as good as an aftermarket CAI setup, but the performance gains will be about the same.
Not to mention the fact, for the $100 you save, you can purchase underdrives, or put the money towards an electric fan.......and extra 8-10hp for the same price.
__________________
Jeremiah 1986 Mustang GT K&N Filter, Removed Air Silencer, Black Magic Fan, 65mm Explorer TB, 110lph BBK Fuel Pump, F/M Force II Cat -Back, O/R h-pipe, U/D's Timing@14* 1986 Mustang LX SSP--new project car AOD, 3.27's, Dumps, 238k miles |
05-03-2010, 12:45 AM | #13 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Allen Park
Posts: 1
|
Re: Cold Air Induction
hello, i have my 94 mustang 5.0 which is complete stock! I wonder which is better to buy cold intake for her? I want to get a throttle body too i want to make sure which one of em fit or match to the cold intake. Please help me! thanks
|
12-04-2010, 03:54 AM | #14 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2
|
re: cold air intake kit
anyone know how to remove cold air intake kit into my car. its annoying me for not knowing that thing. anyone know this? thanks lot guys.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WHY is a 80mm MAF and cold air induction a bad combination?? | 96_4.6 | Modular Madness | 6 | 03-09-2003 02:19 AM |
Cold air induction | StangGT02 | Modular Madness | 5 | 07-14-2002 03:32 AM |
Cold cold air induction!!!!!! | 01 BLACK GT | Modular Madness | 3 | 07-18-2001 02:10 PM |
Cold Air induction.... $7.83 | rbatson | Blue Oval Lounge | 6 | 02-25-2001 01:27 AM |
cold air induction kit | Brett_C | Small Ponies | 0 | 05-03-1999 05:34 PM |