MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 08-05-2003, 10:32 PM   #1
pedley
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Posts: 74
Default exploer intake???

ok whats up with exploer intake why is it just as good as some like gt 40 and ed.brock are the air passages bigger

and would it be better then a stock ported one??

just woundering
pedley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2003, 10:59 PM   #2
TMASTER
Registered Member
 
TMASTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 161
Default

Yhe explorer intake is almost as good as a Cobra intake...
The GT40 is slightly better.
The edelbrock is better too.
Dont waste your money on a Cobra intake unless you want the "look" of it. Otherwise if your really on a budget go for the Explorer intake.
But i picked up my TrickFlow intake for $255 used upper and lower! And I know it flows more than the cobra intake.
TMASTER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2003, 10:23 AM   #3
Dark_5.0
Registered Member
 
Dark_5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
Default

Its way better than a stock ported intake. And some test show it to be better than the GT-40 intake.

I like me explorer intake,
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim.
00' Lightning-Stock
88'CRX-13 second ego killer
Dark_5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2003, 07:18 AM   #4
pedley
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Posts: 74
Default intake?

so what you guys are saying is if i got one for free take??

now would it fit my stock heads that have ben shaved??
pedley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2003, 07:24 AM   #5
tmoss
Registered Member
 
tmoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 634
Default

Jump on it for free!!!!!!!!!!! Most sell for $200+

It's just as good as the GT40 or Cobra. On stock heads it's a great port match but if your not going to change heads then a properly ported stocker can make equal or slightly better power/torque and usually can be bought for less. Paste the link in my sig for more info on the stock lower.
__________________
Tom (Torque) Moss
88Gt 5spd Vert, FLowmaster Catbacks, stock cam advanced 4° @ 108.5° ICL, NMRA prepped GT40P heads 1.85/1.55 valves and 1.7 rockers, MAC P headers Jet-Hot coated, 97 Exlporer intake (ported lower), TB and injectors. 277RWHP/330RWTQ (SAE).

http://www.fastlanecars.com/
tmoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2003, 08:37 PM   #6
chiaronate
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: watervliet, ny
Posts: 105
Default

hey tmoss, i saw your dyno attachment on one of your postings. it torque looks really decent for stock heads. i was wondering if i would pick up more torque with stock heads ported on the exhaust side, and possibly a magnum 270 camshaft. would this be a good cam for torque, or could i do better?
chiaronate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2003, 10:40 PM   #7
pedley
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Posts: 74
Default stocker can??

no i wasn't going to change heads but i was going to port the explorer intake uper and lower

would i benefit with that over my ported stock 5.0 intake?

ok and what the hell is a STOCKER CAN?? Never heard of such thing need more info to learn about it
pedley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2003, 11:23 PM   #8
tmoss
Registered Member
 
tmoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 634
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by chiaronate
hey tmoss, i saw your dyno attachment on one of your postings. it torque looks really decent for stock heads. i was wondering if i would pick up more torque with stock heads ported on the exhaust side, and possibly a magnum 270 camshaft. would this be a good cam for torque, or could i do better?
Buddy Rawls recommends that XE270 cam for a stock motor with no more than exhaust mods - which would match well if you work the E7 exhaust ports. The Ford head is both intake and exhaust restricted but more so on the intake side than exhaust, IMHO.

pedley - you miss read my post. re-read that and "can" means capable of. Not a can.
__________________
Tom (Torque) Moss
88Gt 5spd Vert, FLowmaster Catbacks, stock cam advanced 4° @ 108.5° ICL, NMRA prepped GT40P heads 1.85/1.55 valves and 1.7 rockers, MAC P headers Jet-Hot coated, 97 Exlporer intake (ported lower), TB and injectors. 277RWHP/330RWTQ (SAE).

http://www.fastlanecars.com/
tmoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intake selection with a 383/408 stroker Capri306 Windsor Power 12 05-03-2002 10:12 PM
Explore intake??????????? William Bowers Windsor Power 2 02-14-2002 10:27 PM
HELP!!! oil in intake, what to do?? bosco Windsor Power 4 02-03-2002 05:02 PM
OIL IN INTAKE almost sure from 'pcv' QUIN Windsor Power 8 03-09-2001 01:58 PM
Is the true about Edelbrock heads with TFS intake? gt93mustang Windsor Power 14 03-06-2001 07:01 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53 PM.


SEARCH