© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
01-19-2004, 10:08 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 114
|
2.5 VS 3" Exhaust tq/hp what will it be ?
What would it really come down too if say with my combo I made the 358 lb-ft torque at 4100 rpms (flywheel) like in the article you all have seen before. That was done with full 3" exhaust with flowmasters. If I went to 2.5 " What kind of real world torque numbers would be increased ? I would only think mabye 10 at the most and it would be made at lower rpms, what do you all think ?
__________________
Gt40 X heads,B-303 Cam, Cobra 1.7 Roller Rockers, Edelbrock Victor water pump, 3 Core Radiator, Edelbrock RPM "Air Gap"intake, Road Demon 625 cfm carb, Hooker Super competition Headers, offroad H pipe, T5 |
01-19-2004, 10:36 PM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
|
I have a 2 1/2 inch H-pipe with 3 inch tail pipes cause I seen the same set-up in a mag and it made the most power.
I think full 3 inch exhaust would hurt your torque substantially and only net a moddest gain in HP. I say 2 1/2.
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer |
01-19-2004, 11:39 PM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 114
|
yes that is what I was asking. In the test done below "which is what exactly what i have in my car" it made 358 torque with 3" exhaust. I'm asking how much power I would be increasing it by if I gave it 2.5 instead ???
__________________
Gt40 X heads,B-303 Cam, Cobra 1.7 Roller Rockers, Edelbrock Victor water pump, 3 Core Radiator, Edelbrock RPM "Air Gap"intake, Road Demon 625 cfm carb, Hooker Super competition Headers, offroad H pipe, T5 |
01-20-2004, 08:23 AM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
|
Its hard to say, but on your engine full 3 inch exhaust would make your car slower.
To put things in perspective. My brother has a 420HP 327 in his 81 camaro auto, he had 2 1/2 exhaust and decided to try 3 inch. His 60ft got a tenth worse and the 1/4 got 2 tenths worse. The only positive thing that came from it was he picked up .8 mph.
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer |
01-20-2004, 05:49 PM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 114
|
I dont think some of you understand what I am saying. I am just asking how much torque will I really get if I switch to 2.5. That motor makes 358 lb-ft torque with 3" exhaust. How much would it make with 2.5 ??????
__________________
Gt40 X heads,B-303 Cam, Cobra 1.7 Roller Rockers, Edelbrock Victor water pump, 3 Core Radiator, Edelbrock RPM "Air Gap"intake, Road Demon 625 cfm carb, Hooker Super competition Headers, offroad H pipe, T5 |
01-20-2004, 06:35 PM | #6 |
Rebel Fleet Commander
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Huber Heights, OH
Posts: 1,003
|
My old system was MAC longtubes with 3In H-pipe and mufflers. It made 324 Ft trq at the wheels. No torque hurt here
__________________
1993 Mustang GT, PTK w/ T-64 - My Cardomain Webpage 11.25@123.5 on only 8 psi. 10.84@121 on only 1 headgasket "The Truth is, Your the Weak, and I am the Tyranny of Evil Men!" |
01-20-2004, 06:42 PM | #7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 114
|
Hmm ya that seems about right... how much torque do 5.0s usually get stock at the wheels? 324 is not too bad. According to that dyno sheet I would be making around 305 + torque at the wheels. Since it made 358 flywheel. What you think ?
__________________
Gt40 X heads,B-303 Cam, Cobra 1.7 Roller Rockers, Edelbrock Victor water pump, 3 Core Radiator, Edelbrock RPM "Air Gap"intake, Road Demon 625 cfm carb, Hooker Super competition Headers, offroad H pipe, T5 |
01-21-2004, 02:58 PM | #8 |
Being stroked is great
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 772
|
I doubt 3" would hurt you but fitting 3" over the axle is just about impossible. I would stick with 2.5"...it will easily handle up to around 500 horsepower with no losses, and stronger bottom end power too (can't really put a number on it...every combo is different).
|
01-21-2004, 10:06 PM | #9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rockford
Posts: 596
|
I agree with Jonnyk. Its almost impossible to tell you. If some one gave you a number he would only be kinding himself and you. We all agree that you will make more torque with a 2.5 inch exhust over 3.0 inch. for a street car seeing drive duty. I won't even consider putting on a 3 inch exhust untill I know the power plant is making over 450 flywheel horsepower with all of its power adders if any.
|
01-22-2004, 10:06 PM | #10 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: westerville, OH USA
Posts: 618
|
Whats the deal with the Dr. Gas X-pipe (for longtubes) that goes from 3'' to 2 1/2'', is there a noticable sound/power difference than the regular 2 1/2'' x-pipe? It cost a bunch more, is it worth it?
__________________
1990 Notchback: BBK Ceramic Coated Full length headers, Dr. Gas 3"- 2 1/2" x-pipe, Flowmaster 40's/turndowns. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Got the longtubes...now do I need 3" exhaust? | Stang_ROTY | Windsor Power | 4 | 06-24-2003 07:04 PM |
3" or 2 1\2" exhaust | 66StangGuy | Classic Mustangs | 8 | 02-10-2003 11:50 PM |
Speed Secret # 4 | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 13 | 11-10-2002 03:42 PM |
Speed Secret # 3 | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 13 | 11-09-2002 10:35 AM |
Header gaskets | Stang951 | Windsor Power | 18 | 11-01-2002 05:57 PM |