![SEARCH](http://www.mustangworks.com/images/search.png)
![The Mustang Works](http://www.mustangworks.com/images/mw_footer_logo.gif)
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: montreal, canada
Posts: 19
|
![]() whats up guys, 94GT
shorty headers, flows, and pro-chamber h-pipe, 3.73's superchip and cold air induction, and mac u/pullies. will i see a difference if i put the 70mm throttle body? thanx. ------------------ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 17
|
![]() If you are running the stock TB, then you will get an improvement!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Lafayette, Indiana
Posts: 120
|
![]() On a stock motor you will lose throttle response with a 70mm. Stay with the stock t/b until you are making more power.
------------------ 89 GT convertible, Kenny Brown level 5, 14# Procharger |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Maple Ridge B.C. Canada, The Best Place In The World
Posts: 871
|
![]() The 70 mm t/body would give you more power, but you should consider the 65mm instead, use 70mm's on bigger, or more modified engines. I Would Reccomend The 65mm for you
hope this helps ------------------ No Smog Pump (Shorty Belt), Dumps At The End Of Stock H-Pipe (Sounds Mean), K&N Air Filter (Stock Air Box), 198.9 rwhp @4200 (235 Motor!!), 285 lbs-ft @2900 (336 Motor!!!). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: middleburg, fl, usa
Posts: 1,134
|
![]() I have a friend that put a 70mm throttle body on his mustang and he said it killed his low end power and he said he can not feel a difference up higher either.
I would get the 65mm throttle body until you are a lot more modifyed than you are right now. ------------------ James Cox nochevy@hotmail.com 1991 Mustang LX 12.565 @109.38mph 1.764 60ft |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Dirk Diggler
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: SLOATSBURG, NY
Posts: 1,931
|
![]() dont get either till you get heads and intake..i got a car in the 12's now with stock tb and stock intake..
------------------ 1987 black notch(ex 4 banger) DSS 306 w/ main support...Elderbrock 6028 heads..gt-40 intake..24# injectors...70 mm tb..77 pro-m...accel 300+..mac full legnth..tremec w/ pro5oh...full MAC exhaust,off road h-pipe,long tubes, catback...ron davis radiator..subframes, control arms...CFDF II..o yea holley FPR sucks..dont buy one.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
I need 110mph Trap Speed!
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: So, CA
Posts: 4,315
|
![]() I agree, stay with the stock untill you get heads and cam. Then the 65.
Skyler ------------------ -1989 Saleen Mustang #406- TFS Heads, Edelbrock intake, E-303, 3.73's, 1 5/8 shortys, Offroad-H, 2chamber flows, 36psi FPR, 15degrees timing, 70mm tb, 73mm maf, 24lb inj, Crank pulley, MSD6A, Alum driveshaft. On its way: Paxton Sn-89 with dyno tuning and long tubes. Just added: B&M Ripper, Weldin Subframes, & Turn downs! 13.2@106mph |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
![]() I agree with 89ATI, LX XLR8R, and Skyman.
The 70mm T/B is not going to help your car in peak performance, and it will hurt you significantly in low end torque. Even the 65mm T/B isn't going to do anything for you until you get an intake. With your current mods you really need to work on getting an intake before you get a T/B. Personally, the next mod I'd make if I were you is a better MAF sensor. Then you can focus on your intake, later some head work, and then a cam or at least some roller rockers. The T/B is the last thing you need to be adding, most people don't pick up squat from the larger T/B. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: montreal, canada
Posts: 19
|
![]() well then, i guess no t/b for me, thanx guys , i sort of felt that i still wasnt to the t/b changing phase.
i guess i'll just dump a dry kit for now. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: fair haven,mi,u.s.
Posts: 34
|
![]() ive got a 94 also,i put on 70mm tb and it runs great with it but i do have a lot of mods,if your not gonna do too much to the motor i would go with 65mm see my mods @ http://hapygas.stangnet.com that might help you out
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Adding Power to a V6 | Spyder1914 | Small Ponies | 5 | 02-12-2002 06:57 PM |
Guesstimate the Snake's Power | StoplightWarrior | Windsor Power | 6 | 01-17-2002 09:43 PM |
power shift? | JamGtStang | Windsor Power | 6 | 03-01-2001 02:11 PM |
Electrical power, where to splice? | Chris_H | Windsor Power | 3 | 02-11-2001 08:29 PM |
Power Pipe on a Procharger? | NO SLO PK | Windsor Power | 0 | 01-25-2001 07:14 PM |