Horespower and Tourqe?

95MustangtGT5.0 · 08-05-2001, 11:13 PM

I just traded my 96 GT in for a 95 GT. convertable! With only 58000 miles on it! First off i want to say that, the 5.0 is a hell of a lot better! 4.6 can't compare with a 5.0! I just wanted to know if anyone knows the horsepower and torque rating on this motor for this year? It's a 5 speed, i think it has 2.73 gears, barked the tires in 3rd today! Thanks!

SaleenGTS · 08-05-2001, 11:16 PM

I like the 5.0 better personally, but the 4.6 is way ahead in the tech department. Especially the 99+.

Your car is 215 hp, 285 tq.

Barked the tires in 3rd with 2.73's??? really? hmm. cool.

------------------
Dustin
89 Saleen GT Sport,428 rwhp,TFS Street Heat Intake,TFS TW Heads,TFS #2 cam,BD-11A 9 psi,Crane 1.6 rr's,BBK 70mm TB,Pro-M 80mm MAF,MSD 6BTM, FMS 9mm wires,BBK longtubes,BBK Short H-pipe,American Thunder cat back,3.55's

12.3@119

95mustanggt · 08-06-2001, 09:21 AM

I like your handle

The 5.0 is a good engine. Is your 5.0 Stock? Barking the tires in 3rd gear with 2.73's is not an easy task. You could have steaper gears or a little more steam under the hood...

------------------
1995 Mustang GT

cad614 · 08-06-2001, 11:31 AM

lol... or just bad tires like me.

------------------
'95 GT Convertable

95MustangtGT5.0 · 08-06-2001, 11:11 PM

it's stock, haven't done anything to the motor, it's been lowered with BBK springs and that's about it. I had to power shift to get it to bark the tires in 3rd, the tires are new too! I'm gonna put a 3.55 in it soon!

08-06-2001, 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 95MustangtGT5.0:
it's been lowered with BBK springs and that's about it. I'm gonna put a 3.55 in it soon!

First thing I'd check is the air filter. Does it have a K&N? As mentioned above, it may have gears already. Time to start checking to see what has been done so far. Congradulations, I love verts too!(not to mention the 302)

------------------
Rick
My 89lx(updated 7/20/2001)
Sold

LincoConti87 · 08-07-2001, 10:44 AM

The thing with the K&N is that you only feel horsepower if you know its there cus it really don't do anything on a stock motor...its just a reason to put stickers on stuff

95mustanggt · 08-07-2001, 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 95MustangtGT5.0:
it's stock, haven't done anything to the motor, it's been lowered with BBK springs and that's about it.

Unless you bought it new, just because you haven't done anything to it, doesn't mean someone else...

I though my car was stock, until I crawled under the car and saw the Dynomax Cat back, went to change the air filter, only to pull out a K&N. You just never know...

------------------
1995 Mustang GT

ercool · 08-07-2001, 12:58 PM

yea 5.0 's kick butt
I too have a 95 MUST GT ,though mines
a coupe.
I test drove a 96 4.6 and your're right
it doesn't compare. had I drove the 4.6 first I probably wouldn't have bought a
mustang if i didn't drive the 5.0.

------------------
95 GT 5.0
stillen exh.
K&N
ALL PAID FOR !!!!!!

08-07-2001, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by LincoConti87:
The thing with the K&N is that you only feel horsepower if you know its there cus it really don't do anything on a stock motor...its just a reason to put stickers on stuff

I'll have to disagree with you there bro. A K&N along with a performance tune up and msd brought my mpg up from around 24 to almost 28. Not big on the HP but it does help.

95MustangtGT5.0 · 08-07-2001, 11:01 PM

Crawled up under the car today! Still has stock exhaust on it, checked air filter, just a regular paper filter. Pretty sure it has 2.73 gears on it. Bumped up the timing to 13 degrees today! defenitely feeling a big difference on throttle response! This 5.0 defenitely beats that modular 4.6 motor! This car is a keeper not to mention it's a convertable!!

95 King GT · 08-08-2001, 01:38 AM

thats strange, when my cars was stock at 50,000 miles and my brothers 96 stock gt with 98,000 miles on it, he bet me all of the time , they were both automatics.

95mustanggt · 08-08-2001, 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 95 King GT:
thats strange, when my cars was stock at 50,000 miles and my brothers 96 stock gt with 98,000 miles on it, he bet me all of the time , they were both automatics.

I too have heard of stock 96+ GT's taking stock 94/95 GT's. The driver can make all the difference in the world. But in general the 5.0 SN95's are faster in stock trim.

------------------
1995 Mustang GT

StreetStang37 · 08-08-2001, 02:14 PM

When I bought my car, I didn't know it had a full exhaust untill I looked under the car.

As for your car, it might have 3.08's.

------------------
1993 Mustang GT - March Ram Air & Pullies, K&N, C&L 73mm MAF, 3.73 Gears, Super Competition Hooker Headers, 2 1/2 in. High Flow H-Pipe & Cat Back, Pro 5.0 Shifter, 16* Timing Advance, 8.5mm MSD Super Cunductor Plug Wires, Romoved front Sway Bar, Pro-Shift Lite, LX lights

Unit 5302 · 08-08-2001, 08:47 PM

Actually, if you want to get technical Ford rated the 5.0 manual at 225hp and 300lb/ft and the auto at 215, 285.

SaleenGTS · 08-08-2001, 11:23 PM

Unit-
Where do you get your sources?? I have never seen a 94-95 Mustang rated above 215 auto or not. Just curious

------------------
Dustin
89 Saleen GT Sport,428 rwhp,TFS Street Heat Intake,TFS TW Heads,TFS #2 cam,BD-11A 9 psi,Crane 1.6 rr's,BBK 70mm TB,Pro-M 80mm MAF,MSD 6BTM, FMS 9mm wires,BBK longtubes,BBK Short H-pipe,American Thunder cat back,3.55's

12.3@119

95 King GT · 08-08-2001, 11:44 PM

my 95 gt is rated at 215 hp, and my brothers 96 is rated at 225hp with 3.08 gears i had 2:73. and when raced we left it in drive and he beat me every time

95MustangtGT5.0 · 08-08-2001, 11:47 PM

when i had my 96 GT it was rated at 215, and it was a 5 speed and had 3.27 gears. I couldn't beat a single 5.0 out there, stock or not!

95MustangtGT5.0 · 08-08-2001, 11:50 PM

The fastest i ever got my 96 GT at the track was a 15.20 @ 90 MPH. I can tell just by driving my 95 now that it is faster, than the 96 GT's

95 King GT · 08-09-2001, 12:06 AM

WAS YOUR 96 A AUTO

08-05-2001, 11:13 PM	#1
95MustangtGT5.0 Registered Member Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Bossier City, La Posts: 6	Horespower and Tourqe? I just traded my 96 GT in for a 95 GT. convertable! With only 58000 miles on it! First off i want to say that, the 5.0 is a hell of a lot better! 4.6 can't compare with a 5.0! I just wanted to know if anyone knows the horsepower and torque rating on this motor for this year? It's a 5 speed, i think it has 2.73 gears, barked the tires in 3rd today! Thanks!

08-05-2001, 11:16 PM	#2
SaleenGTS RICE taste like Chicken Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Edmond, OK Posts: 687	I like the 5.0 better personally, but the 4.6 is way ahead in the tech department. Especially the 99+. Your car is 215 hp, 285 tq. Barked the tires in 3rd with 2.73's??? really? hmm. cool. ------------------ Dustin 89 Saleen GT Sport,428 rwhp,TFS Street Heat Intake,TFS TW Heads,TFS #2 cam,BD-11A 9 psi,Crane 1.6 rr's,BBK 70mm TB,Pro-M 80mm MAF,MSD 6BTM, FMS 9mm wires,BBK longtubes,BBK Short H-pipe,American Thunder cat back,3.55's 12.3@119

08-06-2001, 09:21 AM	#3
95mustanggt Registered Member Join Date: May 2000 Location: Kamloops, BC Posts: 2,875	I like your handle The 5.0 is a good engine. Is your 5.0 Stock? Barking the tires in 3rd gear with 2.73's is not an easy task. You could have steaper gears or a little more steam under the hood... ------------------ 1995 Mustang GT

08-06-2001, 11:31 AM	#4
cad614 Senior Member Join Date: Apr 1999 Location: San Angelo, TX Posts: 377	lol... or just bad tires like me. ------------------ '95 GT Convertable

08-06-2001, 11:11 PM	#5
95MustangtGT5.0 Registered Member Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Bossier City, La Posts: 6	it's stock, haven't done anything to the motor, it's been lowered with BBK springs and that's about it. I had to power shift to get it to bark the tires in 3rd, the tires are new too! I'm gonna put a 3.55 in it soon!

08-07-2001, 10:44 AM	#7
LincoConti87 Registered Member Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: Tallahassee,Florida,USA Posts: 188	The thing with the K&N is that you only feel horsepower if you know its there cus it really don't do anything on a stock motor...its just a reason to put stickers on stuff

08-07-2001, 12:58 PM	#9
ercool Registered Member Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: CA Posts: 10	yea 5.0 's kick butt I too have a 95 MUST GT ,though mines a coupe. I test drove a 96 4.6 and your're right it doesn't compare. had I drove the 4.6 first I probably wouldn't have bought a mustang if i didn't drive the 5.0. ------------------ 95 GT 5.0 stillen exh. K&N ALL PAID FOR !!!!!!

08-07-2001, 11:01 PM	#11
95MustangtGT5.0 Registered Member Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Bossier City, La Posts: 6	Crawled up under the car today! Still has stock exhaust on it, checked air filter, just a regular paper filter. Pretty sure it has 2.73 gears on it. Bumped up the timing to 13 degrees today! defenitely feeling a big difference on throttle response! This 5.0 defenitely beats that modular 4.6 motor! This car is a keeper not to mention it's a convertable!!

08-08-2001, 01:38 AM	#12
95 King GT Registered Member Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: coweta OK USA Posts: 93	thats strange, when my cars was stock at 50,000 miles and my brothers 96 stock gt with 98,000 miles on it, he bet me all of the time , they were both automatics.

08-08-2001, 02:14 PM	#14
StreetStang37 Registered Member Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: San Jose, California USA Posts: 275	When I bought my car, I didn't know it had a full exhaust untill I looked under the car. As for your car, it might have 3.08's. ------------------ 1993 Mustang GT - March Ram Air & Pullies, K&N, C&L 73mm MAF, 3.73 Gears, Super Competition Hooker Headers, 2 1/2 in. High Flow H-Pipe & Cat Back, Pro 5.0 Shifter, 16* Timing Advance, 8.5mm MSD Super Cunductor Plug Wires, Romoved front Sway Bar, Pro-Shift Lite, LX lights

08-08-2001, 08:47 PM	#15
Unit 5302 Registered Member Join Date: May 1999 Posts: 5,246	Actually, if you want to get technical Ford rated the 5.0 manual at 225hp and 300lb/ft and the auto at 215, 285.

08-08-2001, 11:23 PM	#16
SaleenGTS RICE taste like Chicken Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Edmond, OK Posts: 687	Unit- Where do you get your sources?? I have never seen a 94-95 Mustang rated above 215 auto or not. Just curious ------------------ Dustin 89 Saleen GT Sport,428 rwhp,TFS Street Heat Intake,TFS TW Heads,TFS #2 cam,BD-11A 9 psi,Crane 1.6 rr's,BBK 70mm TB,Pro-M 80mm MAF,MSD 6BTM, FMS 9mm wires,BBK longtubes,BBK Short H-pipe,American Thunder cat back,3.55's 12.3@119

08-08-2001, 11:44 PM	#17
95 King GT Registered Member Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: coweta OK USA Posts: 93	my 95 gt is rated at 215 hp, and my brothers 96 is rated at 225hp with 3.08 gears i had 2:73. and when raced we left it in drive and he beat me every time

08-08-2001, 11:47 PM	#18
95MustangtGT5.0 Registered Member Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Bossier City, La Posts: 6	when i had my 96 GT it was rated at 215, and it was a 5 speed and had 3.27 gears. I couldn't beat a single 5.0 out there, stock or not!

08-08-2001, 11:50 PM	#19
95MustangtGT5.0 Registered Member Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Bossier City, La Posts: 6	The fastest i ever got my 96 GT at the track was a 15.20 @ 90 MPH. I can tell just by driving my 95 now that it is faster, than the 96 GT's

08-09-2001, 12:06 AM	#20
95 King GT Registered Member Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: coweta OK USA Posts: 93	WAS YOUR 96 A AUTO