© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
06-14-2004, 12:30 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 30
|
Fuel Economy
Been quite some time since I posted last.
Not long after I sold my Basket Case of an 89 GT, in fact. Well, I'm looking at another Mustang. An '84 with 5.0 Liter and manual trans. As Insurance & fuel questions are more immediate concerns, I haven't bothered or even had the opportunity to delve much deeper into the vehicle's equipment. (I.E. if my insurance is too high and or I have to spend too much money on fuel every week, I can't justify buying the thing) I think the car is most likely bone stock with only cosmetic alterations. So I'll use Stock as a baseline. So my question goes out to those of you running similar vehicles (83-84?) as every day drivers Approximately what sort of fuel milage are you folks getting? Thanx FX
__________________
"Names in the New Order were Totem Signs, no longer mere markers for a face. Markers were for Tombstones." |
06-15-2004, 08:11 PM | #2 |
Mizzou Tigers
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: weston, MO United States
Posts: 1,455
|
I can't imagine that the mileage on an 84-85 would vary too much from the fuel injected foxes. Just as a ball park, I would say to expect 22 or so on the hi-way and considerably less than that in town (depending on driving style, gears, etc.). If I am stictly in town, I probably only get 13 mpg or so. But, on the hi-way I can see 24 or so. Those numbers should at least get you in the ball park.
__________________
2006 Mustang GT 1990 LX GT-40 motor 262 horsepower, 307ft-lbs (sold but forever loved) 1998 Contour SVT Rice Haters Club Member #244 |
06-16-2004, 07:06 AM | #3 |
Rebel Fleet Commander
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Huber Heights, OH
Posts: 1,003
|
It will either be carbed or that CFI horseshhit. Dont expect more than 15 avarage. If you want fuel mileage, I suggest you get a newer Mustang or a Metro.
__________________
1993 Mustang GT, PTK w/ T-64 - My Cardomain Webpage 11.25@123.5 on only 8 psi. 10.84@121 on only 1 headgasket "The Truth is, Your the Weak, and I am the Tyranny of Evil Men!" |
06-16-2004, 08:47 AM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Boston
Posts: 592
|
I've been able to get 25 mpg out of a carbed, 3.73 geared mustang. How? Casual driving style, weight reduction (to the order of 400 lbs), underdrive pulleys, a good ignition system, good tuneup, and leaning the mixture a tad. Dont worry about nosediving your milage from a carbed car. _You_ are in charge of setting it up properly but it's not a big deal and you can get very comparable results to FI. If you do end up with a CFI monstrosity, toss the top and put a holley back on. You'll thank yourself once you start making changes to the car.
__________________
91 GT Carb conversion, holley 600 double pumper, edelbrock performer intake, FMS "C" drop springs, march 1000 underdrive pullies, crane 1.7 roller rockers, GT-40P headers, bassani x pipe, american thunder catback, FMS 4.56's, msd aL6, trunkmount battery, A/C eliminator kit, 3000 stall tci streetfighter, AOD with transgo kit, A+ servo, 300M hardened lockup shaft, kevlar bands and 28,000 gvw trans cooler, 3 core radiator, 300 lbs stripped with a full interior |
06-16-2004, 09:17 AM | #5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 30
|
Thank you, Gentlemen. Very helpful.
Ackbar.. "Eww" to the Metro and "Too Expensive" to the Newer 'Stang. (while I didn't like the current style at first, it has grown on me) As well as a Driver, I'll be using the vehicle as a Test Mule for some Alternative Fuel ideas that I believe will be very Up-and-Coming in the next five years or so. (I hope I don't get the same reaction to that as I've gotten o anothe r Automotive forum I visit.. You'd think I suggested to those guys that they should all buy CRXs) My aim is to prove to certain persons of my aquantance that it I IS possible to operate (in this case) a '60s Musclecar cleanly, safely and above all (again, in this case) without power losses.
__________________
"Names in the New Order were Totem Signs, no longer mere markers for a face. Markers were for Tombstones." |
06-16-2004, 03:02 PM | #6 | |
Rebel Fleet Commander
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Huber Heights, OH
Posts: 1,003
|
Quote:
__________________
1993 Mustang GT, PTK w/ T-64 - My Cardomain Webpage 11.25@123.5 on only 8 psi. 10.84@121 on only 1 headgasket "The Truth is, Your the Weak, and I am the Tyranny of Evil Men!" |
|
06-21-2004, 09:25 AM | #7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 30
|
*After doing the numbers on my '94 Mazda B-4000
You mean to tell me that a V-8 Mustang gets better mileage than my V-6 Pickup? Interesting. (Granted the truck isn't running up to par at the moment.) I suppose the Ponydoes have considerably less drag, and has smaller diameter tires..
__________________
"Names in the New Order were Totem Signs, no longer mere markers for a face. Markers were for Tombstones." |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F 250 Diesel Fuel Economy Mods | bigredstang | Built Ford Tough | 1 | 01-15-2003 09:54 AM |
fuel pump choice...fuel economy??? | fongo | Windsor Power | 3 | 09-28-2002 10:03 AM |
Poor Fuel Economy. Any solutions? | txsilver | Blue Oval Lounge | 2 | 03-05-2002 04:09 PM |
Fuel Economy Questions | txsilver | Modular Madness | 1 | 03-04-2002 07:30 AM |
Fuel Economy | txsilver | Small Ponies | 1 | 03-01-2002 03:04 PM |