MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 08-26-2004, 11:16 AM   #21
Hethj7
Mizzou Tigers
 
Hethj7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: weston, MO United States
Posts: 1,455
Default

You can always find him over at theRiceHatersClub .
__________________
2006 Mustang GT

1990 LX
GT-40 motor 262 horsepower, 307ft-lbs (sold but forever loved)

1998 Contour SVT

Rice Haters Club Member #244
Hethj7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2004, 12:20 PM   #22
Falcons Talon
T.P.M. President
 
Falcons Talon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Brownsville
Posts: 265
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Hethj7
I completely disagree here. There is absolutely no benefit from running a higher octane fuel than you need. You are just throwing money away.
First off, that link is very informative. I had read something like that years ago, and this falls right in line with my knowledge.
I'm no expert here...probably far from it, but I am looking at something from this excerpt which I took from the link provided.

Quote:
Use of a fuel that has a higher octane than is required by the engine and the way it has been tuned will result in unburned deposits being created and left behind in the combustion chamber, and on top of the piston.
Provided that you are tuned to run 87 octane gas (10*), yes, you may be harming more than helping by running a higher octane.

If you advance your timing (tuning) to the point of detonation, your are creating a unstable environment that the high flammability of 87 can not control, but by simply using a higher octane level, you can remain tuned at the higher advanced timing because the higher octane can stabiulize the fule to burn at a more controlled rate.

So the million dollar question is, what is the timing advance that will provide the best performance, and what octane do you need to run that timing without having a meltdown.
__________________
Falcons Talon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2004, 02:49 PM   #23
Hethj7
Mizzou Tigers
 
Hethj7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: weston, MO United States
Posts: 1,455
Default

Falcons Talon - You are correct in what you are saying. I was more referring to 88fivepointoh's post:

On any High Performance motor, 93 octane is best, you won't always here the detonation, but it doesn't mean its not happening.. If you move up time from stock, 93 is best.


As you pointed out, this statement is true only if you are tuned to run with 93 octane. To just say "if you move time up from stock, 93 is best" is not sound advice. Depending on your set up, altitude, etc., you may be able to run 89 or even 87 octane depending on how far advanced you are.
If you do advance to the point of having detonation occur, try running 89. Just because you have played with the timing does not mean you need to run out and start pumping 93 octane into your ride.

Also, don't just assume that you are tuned for 87 octane at only 10°. That is just a very safe factory setting and many cars can bump up their timing a few degrees and still run 87.

To respond to titanium92's original question, I would say on a basically stock mustang to advance the timing as much as possible while still being able to run 87 octane. IMO, the performance gains on a stock vehicle will be minimal when advancing the timing far enough to warrant running high octane fuels. To me the added cost of the fuel wouldn't justtify the 3 or 4 more HP you might squeeze out of the car.
__________________
2006 Mustang GT

1990 LX
GT-40 motor 262 horsepower, 307ft-lbs (sold but forever loved)

1998 Contour SVT

Rice Haters Club Member #244
Hethj7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2004, 03:30 PM   #24
88fivepointoh
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Rochester
Posts: 553
Default

Well IMO, i have seen engines smoke head gaskets, and pistons from silent detination.. i have seen it visible on dyno runs and it was told to me by Augustino Racing In Canada that once timing is advanced, a higher grade of fuel is best. These cars were designed in a time where fuel was richer at the pumps and todays fuel sucks.. That is my .02cents on this discussion.
88fivepointoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2004, 03:43 PM   #25
Hethj7
Mizzou Tigers
 
Hethj7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: weston, MO United States
Posts: 1,455
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by 88fivepointoh
Well IMO, i have seen engines smoke head gaskets, and pistons from silent detination.. i have seen it visible on dyno runs and it was told to me by Augustino Racing In Canada that once timing is advanced, a higher grade of fuel is best. These cars were designed in a time where fuel was richer at the pumps and todays fuel sucks.. That is my .02cents on this discussion.
That's cool. I have just heard different from other sources which I believe are knowledgeable. We can just agree to disagree on this one .
__________________
2006 Mustang GT

1990 LX
GT-40 motor 262 horsepower, 307ft-lbs (sold but forever loved)

1998 Contour SVT

Rice Haters Club Member #244
Hethj7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2004, 03:48 PM   #26
titanium92
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 38
Default

Hey great feed back guys.......I'm still up in the air if I should adjust the timing though....everyone seems to be making good points.....aahhh...lol. Too good of points so now i'm more confused....lol.
titanium92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2004, 06:54 PM   #27
88fivepointoh
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Rochester
Posts: 553
Default

I think we all agree to bump up your timing.. its just the fuel rating we all have different opinions of..
88fivepointoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2004, 12:12 PM   #28
Hethj7
Mizzou Tigers
 
Hethj7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: weston, MO United States
Posts: 1,455
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by 88fivepointoh
I think we all agree to bump up your timing.. its just the fuel rating we all have different opinions of..
I will agree with that statement
__________________
2006 Mustang GT

1990 LX
GT-40 motor 262 horsepower, 307ft-lbs (sold but forever loved)

1998 Contour SVT

Rice Haters Club Member #244
Hethj7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2004, 01:55 PM   #29
GhettoPop
Gimme a Drink!
 
GhettoPop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 694
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by titanium92
Hey great feed back guys.......I'm still up in the air if I should adjust the timing though....everyone seems to be making good points.....aahhh...lol. Too good of points so now i'm more confused....lol.
run 87, bump up timing till u hear pinging, then turn it down a degreee or two. continure to run 87 and keep an ear out for pinging, aka, marbles in your engine
__________________
1990 GT,stock T-5,K&N w/o air silencer,March underdrives,FMS wires,timing@14*,PA Perf 130amp alt,Steeda Tri-Ax Shifter,Steeda adj quadrant/clutch cable/firewall adj,Centerforce II clutch,o/r x-pipe,Magnaflow SS catback,g-load brace, subframes,Bilstein struts/shocks,Autometer gauges, 136k and running strong!
GhettoPop is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Total timing vs initial timing for max HP. Dark_5.0 Windsor Power 35 04-28-2009 11:35 PM
Check engine light after steeda pullies / timing adjuster!! HELP!! MineralGray02K Modular Madness 1 09-29-2002 01:11 AM
points and timing specs xfernal Classic Mustangs 1 12-30-2001 04:20 PM
timing chain or timing gear mustang66teen Classic Mustangs 11 06-18-2001 08:44 PM
nos & timing controller todd5litre Windsor Power 5 01-09-2001 08:24 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 PM.


SEARCH