MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-24-2003, 09:28 PM   #21
Nixon1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Palm Bay, FL
Posts: 432
Default

My bad..not thinking clearly. They underrated the power? Huh.. Dang. Well they still won't beat a Z06...too damn heavy. Those beasts weigh in at like 3800 lbs if I remember the Car and Driver writeup right.

Btw, I don't know Ford stats mostly because I don't like Ford.
__________________
'91 Mustang GT 5.0 AOD Daily Driver

Current stats: NEW 302 short block, E-303 cam (@.050, 220/220, .498/.498, 110 degrees), 1.6 roller rockers, Performer RPM heads (aluminum, 1.9/1.6, 60cc chambers), Cobra intake, Granatelli 75mm MAF, Billet AFPR, Equal-Length Shorty Headers, Off-Road X Pipe, Flowmasters, 4.10 POSI

13.73 at 103.8, ~2.2 60'
Nixon1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2003, 01:01 AM   #22
MEDIK418
Registered Member
 
MEDIK418's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Amarillo, Texas, USA
Posts: 780
Default

Quote:
The LS6...just like the LS1 took over for the LT1, the LS6 is the next one..that's the motor in the new Z06 Corvettes. Can we say 405 hp stock? Wow...not even the 2002 SVT Cobras could keep up with that...
Wanna bet? 306 N/A
__________________
1986 four-eyed LX coupe, 358 Cleveland, Tremec TKO600/centerforce clutch, dish cut Probe forged pistons, comp cams hyd.roller cam, .579/.588@224/230, Edel.performer, 670 holley street avenger, CPR custom built long tubes, ported and polished 4bbl heads, manley valves, beehive springs, MSD peo-billet dist/MSD6AL, fluidamper, 5 lug conv. with 17x8 bullits there's more but it's still not finished yet.
Oh, and the oldest boy is turning his 89 GT into a FFR cobra this next summer.
MEDIK418 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2003, 10:54 PM   #23
HotRoddin
cranky old man
 
HotRoddin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Longview Texas
Posts: 683
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Nixon1
mostly because I don't like Ford.
I reckin you better move on down the line ... chevy man !! Other wise you better pull them pistols, cause thems fightin words in these parts
HotRoddin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2003, 03:29 PM   #24
Nixon1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Palm Bay, FL
Posts: 432
Default

Ha ha...well, I wear my Chevy Racing hat driving my Ford...what's that tell ya? I can't argue with cheap power, and that's what this stang is..a whole sh*tload of cheap power. Only other car I've owned is a 91 Camaro RS with minor mods...and the best I've ever done 0-60 was 8.28...16.48 @ 85~ 1/4 mile... It's got nowhere close to anything on the Mustang, except handling.

My dream car is a Chevy, and I don't care much for Ford as a company, but I do think the Mustangs have a lot more balls than I originally thought, especially since I own one now. Never knew they came with 225 horses...that doesn't get mentioned on the GM sites with Ford stats mentioned..they only mention the standard 5.0, 200 horses, not the H.O.

But that's beside the point.. I own a Ford, I like my Ford, I need help to fix my Ford, and I am gonna treat this thing good, even though it will be my daily street beater (can't help it here...)...

So....sorry to rub anyone the wrong way, but ya know what they say...to each their own.
__________________
'91 Mustang GT 5.0 AOD Daily Driver

Current stats: NEW 302 short block, E-303 cam (@.050, 220/220, .498/.498, 110 degrees), 1.6 roller rockers, Performer RPM heads (aluminum, 1.9/1.6, 60cc chambers), Cobra intake, Granatelli 75mm MAF, Billet AFPR, Equal-Length Shorty Headers, Off-Road X Pipe, Flowmasters, 4.10 POSI

13.73 at 103.8, ~2.2 60'
Nixon1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2003, 05:51 PM   #25
jj_jonathon
Trisket
 
jj_jonathon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: University of Florida, FL Posts: ½
Posts: 1,560
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by 91GTturbo
It's been proven time and time again, there is no significant power differences between the base Z28 and an SS. Both are LS1 powered (98-02). Typically the base Z28 is as quick or quicker due to a slight weight advantage over the SS.
maybe youre thinking of the LT1 late-model camaros? cuz trust me...the z28 is slower than the SS...both are fast, but the SS hauls on the Z28...hell the SSs keep up with the vettes (not z06) until about 80mph...91gtturbo is right...the LS1 deserves more respect...an 02 z, vs an 02 GT (both stock, manual, coupe) and the Z would win hands down...and the 02SS would just fly past em both...and the 03 cobra would fly around that...stock GTs are the slowest of the 2002 ponycars...no matter how many times you wanna look at it...
__________________
University of Florida - Physics Major

My 02GT vert
Media Center Pics
BBK Underdrive Pulleys | K&N FIPK (Gen II) | Bullet Grille | Mach 1 Chin Spoiler | UPR Interior Parts | XM Radio | Audiobahn Subs

Ricer Hater's Club Member #1/2 (30) http://www.ricehatersclub.com/
jj_jonathon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2003, 06:11 PM   #26
Coupe50h
Registered Member
 
Coupe50h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SanAntonio, Tx
Posts: 957
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Nixon1
Ha ha...well, I wear my Chevy Racing hat driving my Ford...what's that tell ya?
That you look like a moron while driving.
Quote:
[i]Only other car I've owned is a 91 Camaro RS with minor mods...and the best I've ever done 0-60 was 8.28...16.48 @ 85~ 1/4 mile... It's got nowhere close to anything on the Mustang, except handling.[/B]
and what does that tell ya?

Quote:
[i]and I don't care much for Ford as a company[/B]
But you care about chevy's that dont have cheap power, and then stop production on their only pony car's? to each his own i guess.
__________________
X-Texas highway patrol ssp 1990 coupe - exploder Gt-40 iron heads, Explorer intake, 19 lber's. E-cam. crane 1.7 rollers. 190fp. 75mm maf. 65mm tb, tubular subframe connectors, mac cai, Asp crank pulley, T-5, king cobra clutch, flowtech 1-5/8 unequals, mac X-pipe Frpp driveshaft, lakewood Lca's.
race weight 3,160

12.69 @ 107.35, 1.71 60' 26x8.5 drag's 3.90 gear

13.20 @ 106.91 - 235/60/15 firestones 2.3 60' 3.27 gear
Coupe50h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2003, 07:13 PM   #27
91GTturbo
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Valdese, NC
Posts: 361
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by jj_jonathon
maybe youre thinking of the LT1 late-model camaros? cuz trust me...the z28 is slower than the SS...both are fast, but the SS hauls on the Z28...hell the SSs keep up with the vettes (not z06) until about 80mph...91gtturbo is right...the LS1 deserves more respect...an 02 z, vs an 02 GT (both stock, manual, coupe) and the Z would win hands down...and the 02SS would just fly past em both...and the 03 cobra would fly around that...stock GTs are the slowest of the 2002 ponycars...no matter how many times you wanna look at it...
Seen both on the dyno and seen both run at the track a number of times, both the base Z28 and SS put out almost the same numbers. If the SS has ever option from SLP, then yes it is a few tenths faster in the 1/4 (but how many people have them like that), other than that, they're almost identical.
__________________
91 single turbo vert
91GTturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2003, 07:35 PM   #28
jj_jonathon
Trisket
 
jj_jonathon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: University of Florida, FL Posts: ½
Posts: 1,560
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by 91GTturbo
If the SS has ever option from SLP, then yes it is a few tenths faster in the 1/4 (but how many people have them like that), other than that, they're almost identical.
those slp options are more than just looks? no wonder i always think my brother's SS is so much faster than you guys keep saying...hes got most of the slp options on his 02...lol..so there is a difference...
__________________
University of Florida - Physics Major

My 02GT vert
Media Center Pics
BBK Underdrive Pulleys | K&N FIPK (Gen II) | Bullet Grille | Mach 1 Chin Spoiler | UPR Interior Parts | XM Radio | Audiobahn Subs

Ricer Hater's Club Member #1/2 (30) http://www.ricehatersclub.com/
jj_jonathon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2003, 07:51 PM   #29
Nixon1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Palm Bay, FL
Posts: 432
Default

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Nixon1
Ha ha...well, I wear my Chevy Racing hat driving my Ford...what's that tell ya?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Actually, this says that I have no other decent hats and don't want to buy another.

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[i]Only other car I've owned is a 91 Camaro RS with minor mods...and the best I've ever done 0-60 was 8.28...16.48 @ 85~ 1/4 mile... It's got nowhere close to anything on the Mustang, except handling.[/B]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That means that I'M POOR and bought the Mustang for $3000 because there was no hope in hell of finding an F-Body with the same amount of modification, in decent shape, for that price. Also...that time is with a 3.1 liter V-6 making only 140 horsepower stock, with an automatic, on a car about as heavy as a V8 Foxbody. I'd like to see you do better!


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[i]and I don't care much for Ford as a company[/B]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And actually Chevy has cheap power..it's called a Third Generation F-Body. Aftermarket for them is almost as large as for a Fox Body...their only disadvantage is weight, but they are power and torque monsters and out-handle a Mustang despite the extra fat...especially the TPI 5.7's....and the older carbed L69's were decent for their time too.
================================

On the other topic, the SS's and Z28's are very close.... They're both running the same motor, and power levels are very similar..the SS is just more 'refined'. The hood scoop is also functional if I remember correctly, and you can opt for a 6 speed on them....don't know if you can on the Z's or not.
__________________
'91 Mustang GT 5.0 AOD Daily Driver

Current stats: NEW 302 short block, E-303 cam (@.050, 220/220, .498/.498, 110 degrees), 1.6 roller rockers, Performer RPM heads (aluminum, 1.9/1.6, 60cc chambers), Cobra intake, Granatelli 75mm MAF, Billet AFPR, Equal-Length Shorty Headers, Off-Road X Pipe, Flowmasters, 4.10 POSI

13.73 at 103.8, ~2.2 60'
Nixon1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2003, 08:24 PM   #30
jj_jonathon
Trisket
 
jj_jonathon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: University of Florida, FL Posts: ½
Posts: 1,560
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by jj_jonathon
those slp options are more than just looks? no wonder i always think my brother's SS is so much faster than you guys keep saying...hes got most of the slp options on his 02...lol..so there is a difference...
k, i asked him....basically the only thing he doesnt have from SLP is the suspension and silly little things like floormats and a plaque...

but he said that the Z's and SS's are pretty close at the track cuz the ram air doesnt do much at the track, but on the street he tends to walk all over the Z's...especially the pre-2001 ones...thats when they did the LS1 conversion (aside form the few limited edition pre-2001 LS1 Z28s that were slower anyways - i know someone who has one...nothing special)...

so there ya go
__________________
University of Florida - Physics Major

My 02GT vert
Media Center Pics
BBK Underdrive Pulleys | K&N FIPK (Gen II) | Bullet Grille | Mach 1 Chin Spoiler | UPR Interior Parts | XM Radio | Audiobahn Subs

Ricer Hater's Club Member #1/2 (30) http://www.ricehatersclub.com/
jj_jonathon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2003, 10:06 PM   #31
Coupe50h
Registered Member
 
Coupe50h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SanAntonio, Tx
Posts: 957
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Nixon1
And actually Chevy has cheap power..it's called a Third Generation F-Body. Aftermarket for them is almost as large as for a Fox Body...their only disadvantage is weight, but they are power and torque monsters and out-handle a Mustang despite the extra fat...especially the TPI 5.7's....and the older carbed L69's were decent for their time too.
I dont intend to turn his into a flame, but the 3rd gen has nowhere near the aftermarket of 5.0's, they might eventually.

Tpi's were competitive in stock form, with the first of the efi stangs barely edging them out, But imo with just minor mods the 5.0 would wake up and rape the tpi badly, i however practice this matchup with a friend of mine every wendsday, with his 87 iroc and some minor mods, pretty original, even with him on stickies and rear grs, he has no chance.
I dont consider 600$ headers a cheap mod
__________________
X-Texas highway patrol ssp 1990 coupe - exploder Gt-40 iron heads, Explorer intake, 19 lber's. E-cam. crane 1.7 rollers. 190fp. 75mm maf. 65mm tb, tubular subframe connectors, mac cai, Asp crank pulley, T-5, king cobra clutch, flowtech 1-5/8 unequals, mac X-pipe Frpp driveshaft, lakewood Lca's.
race weight 3,160

12.69 @ 107.35, 1.71 60' 26x8.5 drag's 3.90 gear

13.20 @ 106.91 - 235/60/15 firestones 2.3 60' 3.27 gear
Coupe50h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2003, 09:21 AM   #32
Chevyguy
Backyard Mechanic/Chemist
 
Chevyguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Acton MA USA
Posts: 435
Default

Stock TPI intakes have wayyy to long runners for good top end power. A intake swap with a Accel mini ram or super ram is needed to improve things.

LT-1 or LS-1 swaps go great in a G-3 Camaro too. But wasn't this thread about racing against Stock LS-1 Camaro's and SS's??

To be fair the 02 SS should be compared to a 01 ( or fixed 99) Cobra, not a "stock" 87-93 Mustang, as the SS Camaro was 'bout $ 30,000 with all the goodies.

Probably why some have said there is no difference between the Z-28 and SS is that all the SS really involves is a ram air kit, and optional Torsen diff, and cat back exhaust. Most Z-28's on the track will already have a cold air kit, and cat back exhaust. I can't imagine anyone running at the track with the crappy stock Z-28 airbox very long. Once that is gone a Z-28 will run just as fast as a SS

Mag published times tend toward 13.2 - 13.5 for a real stock SS and 13.6 - 13.9 for a real stock Z-28. I remember a 13.2 time for the last 01 Cobra test I saw.

The guys with Autos probably are guaranteed sub 14 times as you just need to mash and go. The GM A-4 does not slow the car down like a AOD does. The T-56 cars are more prone to driver skill. I can easily see some dorks posting low 14's in a car that can run low 13's cus they have no skill.
__________________
2001 Crown Vic Maurader Airbox/MAF, DR chip Edel IAS shocks Single exhaust :wtf:

93 P-71 Vic interceptor Backup car now

90 5.0 LX Notch SOLD

74 Chevy Laguna type S-3 454 under construction
Currently apart undergoing bodywork.
Chevyguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2003, 11:38 AM   #33
B2r3y
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Htown tx
Posts: 70
Default

Well the SS does beat the Z for the most part but on track they run about even. They both come in a 6-speed and it all depends on the driver.

As for the LS-1 swap , 1998 was the year they did the conversion from the LT-1. Thats why if you went out camero or trans am shoping you would find that the pre-98 modles are a bit cheaper than the 1998-up modles. The LS-1 puts out between 310-325 hp depending on what kind of upgrades you have added to your car stock. The LT-1 pushes about 285-295 stock hp also depending on mods.

I have yet to run up with one of these, I do not know what my car runs with the stock gears in it (88 gt 5-speed) but i think that i could hang with one.
Bryan
B2r3y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2003, 05:00 PM   #34
Nixon1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Palm Bay, FL
Posts: 432
Default

I won't argue this point...5.0's have the biggest aftermarket out there. I was shocked when I looked through a copy of the Summit magazine.. Although Third Gens do have a very large aftermarket as well compared to other cars, nothing can beat a fox-body in those respects.
__________________
'91 Mustang GT 5.0 AOD Daily Driver

Current stats: NEW 302 short block, E-303 cam (@.050, 220/220, .498/.498, 110 degrees), 1.6 roller rockers, Performer RPM heads (aluminum, 1.9/1.6, 60cc chambers), Cobra intake, Granatelli 75mm MAF, Billet AFPR, Equal-Length Shorty Headers, Off-Road X Pipe, Flowmasters, 4.10 POSI

13.73 at 103.8, ~2.2 60'
Nixon1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2003, 01:51 AM   #35
USMC302
Registered Member
 
USMC302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Gallatin, Tn
Posts: 1,326
Default

medik413,

Congrats on your new Marine, let me say on behalf of the United States Marine Corps, welcome to our family. We will take care of him and thank you for supporting your country.

Semper Fidelis
Sgt King
USMC
Currently deployed in the gulf.

OORAH
__________________
USMC302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2003, 02:37 AM   #36
MEDIK418
Registered Member
 
MEDIK418's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Amarillo, Texas, USA
Posts: 780
Default

Sgt. King, thank you so much for the words of encouragement and I pray for all of you and I thank you for what you do. My son asked me if he was making a mistake when he joined because all of his freinds said he was crazy. I told him how proud I was of him and that yes, I did think his timing pretty much sucked. This was last December just at the beginning of the Afghanistan thing and I know this will be a long row to hoe for you guys. I know there are a lot of folks in the world who don't agree with what might happen in Iraq. Please rest assured Sgt. King that you will have this family's undying support and most importantly, our prayers. . .all of you. THanks to the rest of you for letting me rant and I apologize for getting off on this tangent.
Semper Fi!
__________________
1986 four-eyed LX coupe, 358 Cleveland, Tremec TKO600/centerforce clutch, dish cut Probe forged pistons, comp cams hyd.roller cam, .579/.588@224/230, Edel.performer, 670 holley street avenger, CPR custom built long tubes, ported and polished 4bbl heads, manley valves, beehive springs, MSD peo-billet dist/MSD6AL, fluidamper, 5 lug conv. with 17x8 bullits there's more but it's still not finished yet.
Oh, and the oldest boy is turning his 89 GT into a FFR cobra this next summer.
MEDIK418 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2003, 01:26 PM   #37
dragstang86
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: baltimore, md
Posts: 220
Default

my dad has a 2001 Ls1 trans am with the nhra package, 6 speed with the slp ram air, maf, and 160 degree thermostat and fan switch and i ran him at the track with my gt-40 heads and stock roller rockers on slicks and i went a 13.03 @ 103 and he went a 13.15 @108 on radials with the clutch slipping. And i mean you could smell the clutch for awhile after that pass too. I was pretty impressed. That car will go 12's with a better clutch easily. Not bad for a basically stock car.
__________________
90 LX Hatchback
306, AFR 165's 58cc, E303, 1.6 roller rockers, 70mm throttle body, cobra intake, bbk fenderwell, bbk longtubes, x-pipe, flowmasters, pullies, msd 6a, crane ps-92, stock MAF sensor, electric fan, No AC, No air pump, flaming river quick ratio rack


C-4, 3500 stall, 373's, aluminum driveshaft

SSM Lift bars, , sub frame connectors, strut tower brace


12.57 @105.12mph w/ 1.686 60ft before bbk longtubes (with equal shorties)
-----------------------------------------
86 tube chassis coupe - the trailor queen
dragstang86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2003, 02:53 PM   #38
Nixon1
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Palm Bay, FL
Posts: 432
Default

The LS1 Trans Ams from SLP are incredible... With a trap speed like 108, he could've easily done mid 12's...that's the problem though, getting the power to the ground without tirespin, clutch slip, missed/granny shifts, etc. That's the one reason that I'm glad I have an auto...only one thing to focus on, which is gas pedal manipulation. I gotta be careful how much gas I lay down until the top end of first gear too..laying the pedal down anywhere below, say, 4000 rpms (I dont know speed cause speedometer is broken), and I break traction in the rear....but man is it awesome.
__________________
'91 Mustang GT 5.0 AOD Daily Driver

Current stats: NEW 302 short block, E-303 cam (@.050, 220/220, .498/.498, 110 degrees), 1.6 roller rockers, Performer RPM heads (aluminum, 1.9/1.6, 60cc chambers), Cobra intake, Granatelli 75mm MAF, Billet AFPR, Equal-Length Shorty Headers, Off-Road X Pipe, Flowmasters, 4.10 POSI

13.73 at 103.8, ~2.2 60'
Nixon1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2003, 04:05 PM   #39
Dave_mustang_50
Registered Member
 
Dave_mustang_50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: New Port Richey, Florida
Posts: 483
Default

I have driven/been in several fox 5.0 cars including some police interceptors and they wouldnt run with my buddies stock 2002 ram air. I would have think you would want a set of heads and an intake before messing with them. My car dynos at just over 300/310 and I can walk him nicely.
__________________
1969 Mach 1 351C with a c6(for now)

Sold 92 Rag Top GT
Procharged & intercooled DSS 331 LC
Holley Systemax 2 Intake, Edelbrock RPM Heads,E 303 ,blow thru air meter, race bypass, 42 pph injectors,65mm tb,1.7 rr, Mac long tube headers w/off road H pipe, Force 2 catback, TKO,Pro 5.0, K&N, Alum DS,3 core radiator, subframe connectors,3.73`s, Nitto DR`s and a Heavy Foot.
Dave_mustang_50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2003, 04:10 PM   #40
Dark_5.0
Registered Member
 
Dark_5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
Default

I know I am late getting in on this thread, but I found it to be funny.

The Z06 vette is a far superior vehicle than an 03' cobra. Most people dont realize that vettes only weigh about 3200 lbs.

The SS and the Z-28 run nearly identical times.

There is no way in hell a stock or near stock 5.0 will hang with a LS-1 in the big end.

My 01' cobra is very similar in power to an LS-1 and I totaly and completetly destroy stock or near stock 5.0's.

After many mods on my 5.0 I am just now getting to where I beat LS-1's more than I lose.

A convertible automatic LS-1 with a fat chick in the back would still spank a 5.0 5 speed with a good driver.

JMO,
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim.
00' Lightning-Stock
88'CRX-13 second ego killer
Dark_5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pro-M on stock motor? NotchJohnson Windsor Power 3 03-23-2002 10:28 PM
Cobra haters & Late model F-body owners ... attention mystic96 Blue Oval Lounge 14 01-03-2001 03:44 PM
LT's vs. shorties vs. stock headers jonnyk Windsor Power 9 01-01-2001 11:28 AM
late model wheels 65-5.0 Classic Mustangs 4 03-15-2000 04:35 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 AM.


SEARCH