© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
10-04-2003, 05:28 PM | #1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
|
Back pressure measurement?
Has anyone else besides me done this? I welded in some fittings right behind the headers allowing 1/8" steel tubes about 6" long off of the head pipes. I then attatched flexible lines to the interior of the car and attatched a Vacuum guage that also showed positive pessure 0-10 psi.
At idle I got .5 psi and a max of 2.5-3.0 psi at 5500 RPM. The guage actually vacillated alot at that point making a definite reading improbable. I would say 2.75 psi @5500 RPM. Anyone else ever done this? I think anything under 3.0 psi should be OK. Any comments / opinions welcome. Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi. O.B.C. #2 '66 coupe |
10-07-2003, 09:28 PM | #2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 634
|
Nice work - I've considered doing this myself. you have chosen the right spot in the system. Now, you'll have to switch exhaust componanats to see the affects on power and back pressure.
__________________
Tom (Torque) Moss 88Gt 5spd Vert, FLowmaster Catbacks, stock cam advanced 4° @ 108.5° ICL, NMRA prepped GT40P heads 1.85/1.55 valves and 1.7 rockers, MAC P headers Jet-Hot coated, 97 Exlporer intake (ported lower), TB and injectors. 277RWHP/330RWTQ (SAE). http://www.fastlanecars.com/ |
10-08-2003, 09:17 PM | #3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
|
The reason I did it...
The reason I wanted to measure the back pressure in the first place, is because I noticed that the resonator exhaust tips that I'm using (Pace Setter Monza) actually restrict my 2.5" tailpipes down to 1.75" to allow room for the glass pack material. I figured that must hurt power by increasing back pressure. I have new Hooker non resonator unrestricted tips ordered fron Jeg's that should be here Friday.
First thing I'll do is retest the back pressure. Second thing I'll do is do a G-Tech run to see if there's any difference. Eventually, I'll get back to the track for definitive tests when the weather is cold and dry. I'm hoping for a few more ponies at the wheels. Might dyno it again if it looks like there are any gains. Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi. O.B.C. #2 '66 coupe |
10-08-2003, 10:13 PM | #4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 634
|
Car Craft just did an article on what you did. They said back pressure should be between 2-4 psi.
I'd like to hear your results. The smaller diameter that far back may have less effect than you think - you'll know for sure soon.
__________________
Tom (Torque) Moss 88Gt 5spd Vert, FLowmaster Catbacks, stock cam advanced 4° @ 108.5° ICL, NMRA prepped GT40P heads 1.85/1.55 valves and 1.7 rockers, MAC P headers Jet-Hot coated, 97 Exlporer intake (ported lower), TB and injectors. 277RWHP/330RWTQ (SAE). http://www.fastlanecars.com/ |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Oil Pressure Very low on new setup!!! | Z28EATR | Windsor Power | 17 | 09-16-2003 04:03 PM |
fuel pressure issues | mustang98gt | Modular Madness | 3 | 07-05-2003 10:43 PM |
Fuel Pressure 80 PSI??? | White5oh | Windsor Power | 13 | 04-12-2002 01:28 PM |
Timing and fuel pressure | 306 BLUE GT | Windsor Power | 2 | 02-22-2002 12:16 AM |
Back pressure good or bad? | RAGE_5.0 | Blue Oval Lounge | 8 | 11-23-2001 02:00 PM |