

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Everett, MA
Posts: 417
|
![]() This question will probably get locked out, but no one goes into the Ford Truck Forum. What is the best 4bbl. intake manifold for a street engine that only revs to 5,000 rpms? I plan on sitting this intake on top of a pair of E7 Mustang 5.0 heads.
__________________
Nitrous Al |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sunny, Hot, Sebring, Florida
Posts: 725
|
![]() A Edelbrock Performer would be good, don't get the "RPM Performer" thats for up to 6500, get the plain jane "Performer"
__________________
Remember...2nd place is 1st place for losers! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
The Dude
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 1,262
|
![]() anything with long runners; long runners give you more low end torgue, sacrificing flow at high rpms. For your purposes, that is what you want.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Georgia
Posts: 3,866
|
![]() also, you want a "dual plane", not a "single plane"
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
|
![]() I would go with the RPM. The regular Performer isn't much more than an aluminum stock manifold. The RPM is designed with a higher rpm band in mind, but because it's a dual plane manifold, it doesn't give up any bottom end or off idle responsiveness. It also allows for any future mods you may decide to add.
Take care, -Chris
__________________
Webmaster: Rice Haters Club Jim Porter Racing Peckerwoods Pit Stop Support Your Local
RED & WHITE! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
The Dude
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 1,262
|
![]() Quote:
Good point......I hadn't even noticed that he was talking carb! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Georgia
Posts: 3,866
|
![]() doesnt matter....same thing applies to Fuel Injection.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Backyard Mechanic/Chemist
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Acton MA USA
Posts: 435
|
![]() I would not put the RPM manifold on a truck, stick to the performer. At least with a Chevy the performer gives a nice boost compared to a stock intake, the performer package sucks cus the perfomer cam is really wimpy basically a stock cam.
So get the Edelbrock performer, maybe a good 4x4 grind cam too.
__________________
2001 Crown Vic Maurader Airbox/MAF, DR chip Edel IAS shocks Single exhaust :wtf: 93 P-71 Vic interceptor Backup car now 90 5.0 LX Notch SOLD 74 Chevy Laguna type S-3 454 under construction Currently apart undergoing bodywork. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
The Notorious One
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 51
|
![]() The "plain jane" Performer works for me
![]()
__________________
1990 5.0 LX Hatch - all the usuals and much more. Running low 12's @ 112-115mph (1.78 60') all day long! Damn this thing's fast!!! [url]"http://www.mustangworks.com/cgi-bin/moi-display.cgi?1959"my ride[url] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Utica, Michigan
Posts: 2,631
|
![]() Put my vote in for the Performer!
__________________
1988 Mustang GT stock bottom 302, C4 10.9 @ 128 with 8 psi of Novi 1000 boost!----STOLEN 1989 Mustang notchback Warmed up 306 with a Procharger. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rare Mustangs....Got One? | 1969Mach1 | Blue Oval Lounge | 22 | 09-25-2010 04:59 AM |
raced a Supra Twin Turbo | Stang35th | Stang Stories | 63 | 08-23-2003 12:36 AM |
Need to replace intake manifold... what to do...? | GaryDawg | Modular Madness | 4 | 03-05-2003 02:49 PM |
Intake Manifold ?'s | Tbird8450 | Windsor Power | 6 | 04-18-2001 01:23 PM |
intake manifold selection | yusuf | Windsor Power | 0 | 03-05-2001 04:07 AM |