MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07-01-2001, 11:24 AM   #1
crvtkllr20
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: jacksonville, north carolina, USA
Posts: 2
Post stock cams

i just got a few questions. one is what are the specs on a stock 1992 mustang lx 5.0l. and two what is the performance potentials of it.? thanks. thats just for general knowledge. another question is i just bought an engine, supposedly? the crank has been turned, the rods shot-peened and race prepped, forged pistons,10.1 compression,fully ported and polished stock heads and intake,and a 224/224 duration and a .540/.540 lift,what would the pereformance potential on that be. i am new to racing so i would appreciate any help. thanks.
crvtkllr20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2001, 08:53 PM   #2
macx
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Gordonville MO USA
Posts: 448
Post

The shortblock sounds pretty good -
that duration of cam would likely put
the torque peak around 4500 and the power
peak about 5500. However, even ported
stock heads and esp. stock intake are
going to choke that off somewhat.

just some options - check www.worldcastings.com for their new and
excellent Roush tweaked windsor iron heads
at about $800 (also avail alum for maybe
$1100), or www.trickflow.com for their very
good alum twist wedge street heads which can be had some places for about an even grand,
or about the best warm street heads for 302-size motors now are the alum AFR 165's but go closer to $1300. The iron roush windsor's are very close to any warm street
alum head. For intake, you're better off
with i.e. the 2nd level of trick flow street intake (Track Heat, # 51500002 rpm range 1500 - 6500), or the cobra or explorer intake or GT-40. Explorer the cheapest (Ford take-offs - look in ford/Mustang mags), trick flow not bad if you shop, cobra & explorer good mid-range. check out www.airflowresearch.com for some interesting
archive articles. Your heads and intake are
better suited to someone wanting to keep closer to stock (stock or mild cam upgrade) and should offset much of the
upgrade cost. If your email is posted, I'll send you an article on head comparisons - if it isn't posted, email me at macx@eoni.com and tell me you want the head article. eye-opening. Good luck.
macx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2001, 10:02 PM   #3
BigEd
Registered Member
 
BigEd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 56
Cool

These are the stock cam specs I got off another website. 5.0L HO 89-95;E8ZE-CA,F1ZE-AA,F4ZE-DA;Hydraulic Roller; .444; .444; 266; 276 ;115.5
BigEd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dont use 1.7 rockers with stock heads? Coupe5oh Windsor Power 10 11-28-2015 12:36 PM
which alphabet cam 93GTDIN Windsor Power 36 10-08-2002 06:13 PM
For whoever it was considering using stock ported heads 2FastLX Windsor Power 5 10-11-2001 01:53 PM
Ported Stock Heads... FivepointOH Windsor Power 5 03-12-2001 03:47 PM
LT's vs. shorties vs. stock headers jonnyk Windsor Power 9 01-01-2001 11:28 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:27 PM.


SEARCH