

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: KC Metro
Posts: 20
|
![]() I got the SCT tune and Dyno today. The engine died/choked off at 5200 RPM. The Dyno showed 246 HP @ 5100 and 297.5 TQ @ 3800.
The combo consist of a 331 SB (9.75 CR) GT-40 Irons (3 Angle Valve Job, Surfaced) 1.7 RR's, E-Cam, Shorty's, ORH and Flows. The rest is all factory as it came on the car (1994 Cobra). I knew the stock TB, Mass Air Meter and Cobra intake would choke it some. I thought it would peak at 5500 and make another 30 RWHP. The wife and I are expecting so I wont be getting heads anytime soon. Anybody have an opinion on what a larger Mass Air Meter and Throttle Body will do for the numbers? I know I'll have to get it retuned, to bad I did not get those parts before the tune although drivability was horrible. Happy with the TQ just want a little more HP. Anything I can do that wont affect the chip & tune to get a little more out of it? ![]()
__________________
1994 Cobra 331 Stroker, 3.73's. 1991 F-150 4X4 33X12.50's, Lift |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
|
![]() I dynoed 255 RWHP with ported stock heads, stock TB, stock cam, cobra intake and all the bolt ons on the stock 302.
You probably have bigger issues than the TB and MAM.
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: KC Metro
Posts: 20
|
![]() You might be right!
I cant figure out what else could be causing it, the engine starts dropping HP drastically. The tuner said he thought the MAM, TB, GT-40 Irons and Cobra upper and lower were to restrictive for the extra cubes. I had always read that the aforementioned parts were good to atleast 5600 RPM even with the extra stroke. I figured they would be a limiting factor but not to that extent. Can anybody think of anything I might have missed. The springs were new and good to .600 lift. It has #24lb injectors so it's not starving for fuel. The E-Cam, heads, TB & MAM sizes work well together and should make peak at 5600 on a 5.0. I have seen and read about stock long block 94-95 Cobra's with similar set ups (Cam, Exhaust,GT-40's 3 angle & Surfaced) getting better numbers. I did not expect over 300 RWHP but thought the extra stoke and slightly higher CR would net around 270-290 RWHP and 310-325 RWTQ. ![]()
__________________
1994 Cobra 331 Stroker, 3.73's. 1991 F-150 4X4 33X12.50's, Lift |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Undescribable
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Ft Myers Fla
Posts: 1,539
|
![]() 331 engine with parts that are better suited to a 302. i would think torque would have been a lil better due to the engine size.
__________________
Rice Haters Club Member #101 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
|
![]() Cars running the cobra ecu almost never dyno well.
I would expect to put out over 350RWHP with my top end on a 331. What was your AFR.
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Ride Hard
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Wyoming IL
Posts: 1,094
|
![]() I think the torque should be higher. What about your timing and ignition?
Ryan
__________________
65 Fastback 91 roller 306, H/C/I AOD-Bauman, PI Stallion, 4.10's and traction loc 04 Grand Cherokee Freedom Edition 79 Ford F-250 4x4 - Restored |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: KC Metro
Posts: 20
|
![]() Timing was set at 10 degrees so the tuner could do what he wanted with it via the chip. The AFR was 13.9 according to the print off.
My post initial post is unclear, prior to 5100 RPM's the torque line was pretty flat and the HP was heading up. At 5100 RPM's the HP did not flatten out and then drop it just drastically dropped. No plataue (sp) justa rapid spike downward like it was missing fuel or air. The rapid drop with no plataue (sp) is what confuses me. I put in a new fuel filter today and cleaned the dirty element in the MAM. I'am going to check fuel delivery first via checking the injectors. Then I'll address the air by getting a new MAM, TB and hopefully porting the lower. Then the stock ignition will be addressed. What other things could cause such a rapid HP decline at high RPM's? I would think a need for more air would still plataue (sp) prior to falling off would that be correct?
__________________
1994 Cobra 331 Stroker, 3.73's. 1991 F-150 4X4 33X12.50's, Lift |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Sober voice of Reason
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Kelowna, B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,514
|
![]() First off, what type of dyno (mustang, dynojet, etc..)? Next thing, what does the A/F do when the power falls off? Also, how much timing are you runnning?
__________________
393W: AFR 205's, hydraulic roller, TKO600. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: KC Metro
Posts: 20
|
![]() It was a Dyno Jet, total timing was at 28, the AFR dropped slightly. I'am going to get a new MAM and TB and hope it frees up some power when it's retuned. I know full potential will not be achieved with the GT-40 Irons, cant afford new ones right now though.
Does anybody have an estimate on how lean it will get with a 73 mm MAM and an aftermarket 65 mm TB. Once I get those on I will not be able to get it tuned for several weeks. Thanks For The Help!
__________________
1994 Cobra 331 Stroker, 3.73's. 1991 F-150 4X4 33X12.50's, Lift |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Sober voice of Reason
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Kelowna, B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,514
|
![]() Any particular reason why you were only running 28* of total timing? With non-p GT-40's you'll need more timing, with my old combo it was best with 34* of total timing. On back to back runs, I gained 1.5mph going from 30* total to 32*, then another mph going up to 34*.
__________________
393W: AFR 205's, hydraulic roller, TKO600. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
|
![]() Afetr re-reading this thread it sounds to me like your clutch is slipping.
Bet you a dollar. ![]()
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Oviedo, FL
Posts: 992
|
![]() Agree on the low degree of advance. 5150 rpm is where the torque and the hp meet.
Sounds like it needs more timing.
__________________
"Support our Troops" Dave 1968 Cougar 2004 Thunderbird 2007 F150 Harley-Davidson, SuperCrew 1986 LTD 1997 Ranger 1992 Honda Civic |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: KC Metro
Posts: 20
|
![]() I will advance total timing to 32. I hope the clutch is not slipping we just put it in
![]() I changed the cap, plug and coil wires, fuel filter (dirty appeared to be from Ford on a 100K chasis). I was dumb not to look into that before putting it back together. Adding a new MAM and TB this week. I will then get it back to the Dyno late next week and let everybody know how she does. It already feels stronger except it no longer wants to idle when the chip is flipped to the street tune ![]() I appreciate the reply's it really helps me in tracking down cause(s). Everything will be addressed and I will be looking into the clutch slipage. Thanks
__________________
1994 Cobra 331 Stroker, 3.73's. 1991 F-150 4X4 33X12.50's, Lift |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
I'd rather be basketweaving
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,551
|
![]() Quote:
Can you post up the hp/AF curve?
__________________
NMRA O/C 9516 NA pumpgas stickshift 347 10.65@125.6, 6.73@100, 1.41 60ft |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
I'd rather be basketweaving
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,551
|
![]() oh yeah, PM me if you'd be interested in purchasing a used pro-M 80mm MAM calibrated for 24lb injectors, for cheap
__________________
NMRA O/C 9516 NA pumpgas stickshift 347 10.65@125.6, 6.73@100, 1.41 60ft |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
|
![]() The cobra intake and mam and 65mm TB will support way more HP than what you are making. Roughly about 425 FWHP.
The heads are the bottleneck. I know people with the GT-40 intake on 351 based engines making over 400RWHP through a 65mm TB. There are a number of things it could be. Maybe the cam is a tooth off??? I doubt it but you never know. I am not sure about the 94-95 cobras but the 93 cobras have a mass air sensor calibrated for 19# injectors even though it has 24#er's the ecu makes up the difference. So be careful buying a MAM calibrated for 24# injectors.
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: KC Metro
Posts: 20
|
![]() I dont have a scanner so I cant post the sheet they gave me. I appreciate the offer on the Pro-M unfortunately one is already on the way ordered two days ago.
![]() Dark5.0 The cam was installed straight up dont think that's the problem. The stock TB was 60mm and was replaced today with a 65mm. I will reuse the stock electronics on the new MAM. 94-95's are like the 93's the MAM is for 19's and the j4j1 modifies it for the 24's. I figured the heads would be a bottleneck but did not figure they would hurt me that much. I cant afford new ones right now but will get some next year when the motor is still low mileage. Thanks for the input guys it has been a great help. I'll post the new numbers after getting her back to the Dyno and the chip retuned. ![]()
__________________
1994 Cobra 331 Stroker, 3.73's. 1991 F-150 4X4 33X12.50's, Lift |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Registered Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 156
|
![]() Quote:
a dirty fuel filter can surely cause a huge loss in power. my 96 cobra ran like a diff car after simply changing it. haha. an if it is 100K old.. good god i dunno how ur car even runs. i hope u gett it all worked out!
__________________
347- ported X heads, Xcam , RPM air-gap intake, 650 holley DP, 10:5 comp., equal lenght shorties, pullies, MSD ignition, pro 5.0 shifter. stock fuel system !! best ET: 11.95 @113 1.64 60 foots |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Staging lane
Posts: 4,337
|
![]() If your car is a real Cobra it should have came with a 65mm TB from the factory
![]()
__________________
92' LX-Big brakes, Lots and lots of suspension, GT40X heads, Ported cobra intake, stock cam, Vortech SC trim. 00' Lightning-Stock 88'CRX-13 second ego killer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: KC Metro
Posts: 20
|
![]() Car is a real Cobra (#4709) I bought it from a friend who was the original owner (bone stock down to air silencer when purchased).
I've read that the 93's had a 65mm but 94-95's had a 60mm. No idea why they went smaller with the more restrictive intake inlet. I checked several places and even measured mine before ordering another one. ![]()
__________________
1994 Cobra 331 Stroker, 3.73's. 1991 F-150 4X4 33X12.50's, Lift |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stingy Dyno? | SleeperGT | Modular Madness | 4 | 10-22-2003 01:42 PM |
My latest dyno adventures | XR1stang | Blue Oval Lounge | 6 | 08-01-2003 04:00 PM |
Speed Secret # 3 | jim_howard_pdx | Windsor Power | 13 | 11-09-2002 10:35 AM |
Best shift points from dyno graph? | 302 LX Eric | Windsor Power | 20 | 06-29-2001 02:15 PM |
Very disappointed with my 347 dyno! | 8850 | Windsor Power | 32 | 01-12-2001 12:41 PM |