MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 10-22-2001, 11:36 AM   #1
sgwinn
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 84
Post 3.73 vs 3.55 you know the drill

I've got 3.08's and want more. Any reason to not get the 3.73 over the 3.55's? Do you need to have anything besides the speedo recalibrated? computer problems, etc? thought it would also be a good time to get pulley's installed too. Gears would speed up the accessories, pulleys slow them down for a net of zero?
sgwinn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2001, 11:51 AM   #2
302 LX Eric
or '331 LX Eric'
 
302 LX Eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,142
Post

With the marginal difference in RPMs at highway speeds, I would recommend the 3.73's - even though I have the 3.55's

Pullies are a good mod too. If you're worried about the alternator not getting enough charge from the larger pulley - don't. It really doesn't have that much effect. Unless you are going to be sitting in traffic for hours on end would it really hurt you. I've had my March pulleys on for ~5 years now and have never had a problem - same battery for the last 4 years to boot!

Good luck,
E

------------------
1991 5.0 LX Coupe - 38,000 miles

13.17 @ 106.14 mph w/ 2.138 60'
302 LX Eric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2001, 05:45 PM   #3
Fox Body
Mustang Maniac
 
Fox Body's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: GA, U.S.A
Posts: 2,266
Post

For an AOD'd stang, 3.73s.

If you had a C4, daily driven (long distances) stang or even 5-sp manual, it'd be a different story.

-----------------------------------------
351W-powered 1979 Ford Mustang notchback
Stock 5.8L under custom made 4" cowl, C4 w/ shift kit
Holley 750 cfm, Edelbrock Performer RPM intake
1 5/8" MAC shorty headers, Al driveshaft
2.5" Off road H-pipe, 2-chamber Flowmasters
Front: 225/60/15, Rear: 255/60/15 Eagle GT II
Weld wheels (15x6;15x8), 8.8" Rear w/ 3.55s
14 x 4” K&N air filter. Only a few months b4 Project FOX begins!!!

"Red, thou art my companion. Hasten now your quickened metamorphosis to Green that I may conquer all who dare abide there beside me. May they be left thither behind burnt black." ---Fox Body
Fox Body is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2001, 05:47 PM   #4
mgranzow
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: milwaukee, WI
Posts: 9
Post

i'm getting 3.73's.
yes, the speedo will be a bit off, but a speedo shop can fix that, and the difference is so marginal, just do it.

Don't fear the gear.
mgranzow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2001, 09:42 PM   #5
jz_mustang50
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
Posts: 50
Post

Get 4.10's... changing to 3.55's would be a waste. Are you just a street racer or a real racer? If you take the car to the track there is no reason not to get 4.10's. The idea of a gear change is to make use of all your gears, not just 1-2-3 w/ a stick, use 4th... you should top out in 4th at slightly higher RPM's then your shift point. My car in overdrive was at 2600 @ 70-75. I drove it all over, my only car for 3 months. 3.55's are just way to conservitive...

------------------
Joe Zemaitis, Grand Rapids Michigan

1991 Mustang GT. Mods to date: 4.10 rear end, new POSI, aluminum driveshaft, AOD w/ shift kit, 2 1/2 off road h-pipe, 2 1/2 flowmasters and 2 1/2 tail pipes. Electric fan, Removed air pump and egr tube. Hotchkins upper and lower control arms. New energy suspension rear busings. Hoosier Quick Time Pro 27x10.5x15 and bolt on subframes soon to be welded. Everything else is STOCK. Totally stock ENGINE. 14.29@96 with 130k miles.
jz_mustang50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2001, 10:18 PM   #6
Strim91GT
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Kansas
Posts: 59
Post

I'd go for 4.10's. I drive my car all over the place and love the 4.10's. it's still not bad down the interstate. One thing to watch out for if you have an aod. I put in 4.10's and the aod I had was shot within 10 miles. So i converted to a tremec tko. But i love the 4.10's wouldn't change for anything. But if you are strictly only looking at 3.73's or 3.55's, go for the 3.73's, i think you'll be glad you did.
Strim91GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2001, 11:28 AM   #7
sgwinn
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 84
Post

Sorry, I forgot to mention I have a 1990 LX 5sp with 76k miles and no mods other than K&N filter. Just street racing and daily driver; 26 miles a day. Probably go with the 3.73's. Best to get a Ford dealer to install? I've heard they are a B---- to do and get it right. thanks
Stan
sgwinn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2001, 11:41 AM   #8
StreetStang37
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Jose, California USA
Posts: 275
Post

You should probably get an aluminum drive shaft too. You'll have some vibration (almost all owners) at higher speeds.

------------------
1993 Mustang GT - K&N, March Ram Air & Pullies, 73mm C&L MAF, Edelbrock 65mm TB & EGR, 1 5/8in Equal Length Super Competition Hooker Headers, 2 1/2in H-Pipe w/hi-flow cats & Flowmaster 2 1/2in Cat-Back Exhaust, FlowTech Cut-Outs, Nitto DR's, 3.73 gears, FMS Aluminum DriveShaft, Pro 5.0 Shifter, Pro-Shift Lite, 8.5mm MSD Super Cunductor Plug Wires, PowerSlot rotors, PowerMaster 140amp Alt., LX lights, Cobra R hood w/SVO scoop, Saleen spoiler, Cobra Bumper, 3in chrome tips.
StreetStang37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2001, 04:04 PM   #9
Chevyguy
Backyard Mechanic/Chemist
 
Chevyguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Acton MA USA
Posts: 435
Cool

Just checked it out on the analyzer. With stock tires your 80 mph rpm is 2190 with the 3.08, 2524, 3.55, 2652, 3.73 and 2916 with the 4.10.

With the stock motor it may slow you down to go higher than 3.73 but I would go 3.55 for a mild daily driven mostly stock car. How often will you notice the 0.1 - 0.3 in the quarter?? With more exhaust and intake mods the motor will make more power at higher rpms, and would respond to the 3.73 or 4.10 gears, remember those AOD guys have a deeper overdrive gear too.

------------------
Frank W 90 5.0 LX Notch MAC 2.5"cat bk FMS alu ds, MSD coil, MAC shifter 2.73 gears user site
88 Notch 2.3L FOR SALE! My two Notchbacks
74 Chevy Laguna Type S-3 305 now 454 soon My web site
Chevyguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2001, 04:56 PM   #10
bada$$lx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

4.10's if it's an auto and the 3.73's if it's a 5-speed.......unless you're gonna blow that thing, then you might want to stick w/ 3.55's.

------------------
'90 LX 5.0;12K original miles;FMS 3.55 gears; March pulleys;Edelbrock Performer Heads;BBK 1 5/8" equal length shorties;MSD 6AL ignition w/ blaster 2 coil;FMS E303 cam;Pro-M 75mm MAF;BBK 70mm TB; Eibach drag-launch spring kit;Southside weld-on subs;9" K&N cone filter charger;Hurst shifter;Cervini 3" turbo hood;A/C delete;gutted cats;2 chamber Flomasters;Corbeau racing seats;FMS 30# injectors;JMS custom chip;Holley 190lb fp;TFS track heat intake (12.299 @ 113mph w/ a 1.78 60')
....soon to be b
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2001, 06:56 PM   #11
Nitrous Al
Registered Member
 
Nitrous Al's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Everett, MA
Posts: 417
Thumbs up

Put in the 3.73:1 gearset!!!
Nitrous Al is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ce in 3.55 and 3.73 gears? 1jimmy__d Windsor Power 6 03-24-2003 12:27 PM
3.55 vs. 3.73 TwiLighTBluEGT Windsor Power 8 06-21-2002 12:44 PM
3.55 or 3.73? DemonGT Windsor Power 17 06-15-2001 01:54 AM
3.55 vs 3.73 xspeed02 Windsor Power 1 04-10-2001 09:00 PM
3.55, 3.73 or 4.10 Mouse Eater Windsor Power 12 01-15-2001 08:03 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 AM.


SEARCH