

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: frankfort,ky
Posts: 54
|
![]() looking for some simple street mods. i dont know to much about speed density. only that i herd not to mess with the cam,and that the 86 has real crappy heads. will it still work on a 92 long block with a b-303 cam? also this car came with a chip in the computer will i have to change it as well?
[This message has been edited by kystang86 (edited 01-03-2001).] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() The 86's do have crappy heads and plus they have no valve relies in the pistons. You can do pretty much any mod besides cam. Not only because of speed density but because of the pistons. If you got a 92 block a cam is possible with mass air. I plan on running an E-303 in my 86 with-out mass air, since it's not gonna be a daily driver.
As for the chip, it depends if it was custo burn't or not. If it was then it will need recalibrated. I think, The off the shelf chips don't need to be.(not sure??) ------------------ Mike Sold my 88GT Aug Y2K ![]() Just got T-top 86GT 11-18-2000 |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Sniffed too much n20
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Ont, Canada
Posts: 1,018
|
![]() I found that an 88 S/D computer made driveability easier on my 86, but I have since switched to Mass Air and yeah, the heads are junk compared to the 87+ heads...
You can run a 92 block/pistons, etc. and do anything within its limits, but the cam will be the hardest thing to do as speed density may not like it, although there are some people on this site that are whizzes with S/D and can help you out more than I. Myself, I went with mass air because it was inexpensive (got it from my brother) and because I know I'm going to have mods in the future that would require it..As for the chip, if its an off the shelf one, it should be okay for the future, I'd contact the manufacturer though. The normal bolt-ons apply of course, as I ran my 86 engine with the 86 heads with headers/off-road H pipe/catback, 88 intake with the 60mm throttle body (made a noticeable improvement) and short belt.. [This message has been edited by 86GT (edited 01-04-2001).] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Pierre Part, La. U.S.A.
Posts: 1,850
|
![]() I put a completly stock motor from a junk yard in my car. It ran 13.42 at 102. Why? The car is set up. It will 60ft 1.60s. It is light(more so now). Do the simple stuff, it will get you fast, cheap.
![]() ------------------ Jason B Johnson 88LX,speed density,edel heads,4.30s,B-303,cobra,tremac, 12.38 @ 111.28 1.80 60ft 28X10 street tires 12.17 @ 112 26 X 10 slicks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: INDIANA
Posts: 658
|
![]() You can do about anything but from what i've seen at shops and read sd doesn't like boost my car has 89e7's 89 intake,tb.off road h ,mac cat back,mac shorties,and it runs fine but if you have a 92 block and heads put a cam in it i know you can get it runnin heck just ask any of these fast sd guys on here
------------------ 86GT-MACcatback-89heads,intake,TB,KENNYBROWNsubs,3.73's,HURST shifter,much more to come |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
First ticket. Sucks, sucks bad. | zepherman | Blue Oval Lounge | 46 | 12-16-2001 07:24 PM |
EFI conversion with Speed Density and a 351w? | PSI GUY | Windsor Power | 2 | 12-02-2001 11:13 PM |
12 second speed density | Yan88gt | Windsor Power | 9 | 09-13-2001 09:13 PM |
wan't to go faster with N/A speed density | Yan88gt | Windsor Power | 4 | 06-13-2001 11:10 PM |
speed density question.. | bobtodd | Blue Oval Lounge | 2 | 04-15-2001 02:03 AM |