MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 02-05-2005, 01:18 AM   #1
Fat0eknee
I'm slow ...I know.
 
Fat0eknee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: houston
Posts: 518
Default is my engine builder on drugs?

well i pulled the motor/tranny from my car and took the block to a machine shop ...he is going to turn my lil 302 into a 347 - so i ask him ...what kind of numbers would i be producing from this 347 with a set of TFS heads, im thinkin in my head of an hp number higher than what he told me ...i was kind of disappointed

my setup is going to be something along the lines of
347
TFS heads
some badass cam
edelbrock RPM air gap intake
compression should be like 10:1
and a barry grant carb ..dont know what cfm im lookin at but im thinkin 650-750 im not too sure

anybody have any guesses on what kind of power i should make
..after a few guesses ill tell you the hp number he told me
Fat0eknee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2005, 01:43 AM   #2
82 GT
Import Slayer
 
82 GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 2,241
Default Re: is my engine builder on drugs?

Your setup specs are a little vague. The only thing you're positive about is what heads and intake you'll have.
Your cam selection is either going to have a huge impact on how your engine performs so I would do some research first before grabbing the biggest "badass" cam you can find
Bigger is not always better..especially when it comes to cams.
If you choose your parts wisely, you could make close to 400hp
__________________
'82 GT 351W (.060)Comp Cams 274* Extreme Energy cam, ported & polished heads w/ 1.94/1.60 valves 10.3:1 flat top pistons,stealth intake, Mallory dizzy,Holley 750dp carb, BBK shorties,Flowmaster exhaust,C-4 with 3700 stall converter, B&M pro shifter,8.8 rear, 4:10's, subframes, electric fan, powermaster alternator, 4 core radiator.
82 GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2005, 01:44 AM   #3
82 GT
Import Slayer
 
82 GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 2,241
Default Re: is my engine builder on drugs?

BTW, we won't know if your engine builder is on drugs or not until you tell us his HP guess.
__________________
'82 GT 351W (.060)Comp Cams 274* Extreme Energy cam, ported & polished heads w/ 1.94/1.60 valves 10.3:1 flat top pistons,stealth intake, Mallory dizzy,Holley 750dp carb, BBK shorties,Flowmaster exhaust,C-4 with 3700 stall converter, B&M pro shifter,8.8 rear, 4:10's, subframes, electric fan, powermaster alternator, 4 core radiator.
82 GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2005, 02:14 AM   #4
tireburner163
It's a lot like a race car
 
tireburner163's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Meridian, MS
Posts: 4,130
Default Re: is my engine builder on drugs?

400 hp or so sounds reasonable.

But agree, you set-up is awefully vauge.

What kind of cam? What kind of TW heads?

Ditch that performer RPM intake and get a Vic Jr.
__________________
1987 Buick T-type

1998 HD Electra Elide
tireburner163 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2005, 08:20 AM   #5
Jeff Chambers
Moderator
 
Jeff Chambers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Milan, OH
Posts: 2,699
Default Re: is my engine builder on drugs?

Engine builder is probably right, you're probably wrong. I don't mean that to be offensive, it would just seem that your engine builder probably knows more about this type of thing than you do.

For an engine slapped together from off-the-shelf, out-of-the-box components, the best estimate is probably around 1.15-1.25 HP per cubic inch, normally aspirated. If you listen to your experience builder and take the advice of other experienced racers, you could probably hope for 1.5 HP per cubic inch. Go all out, break the bank and do some R&D and 2.0 HP per cubic inch is not out of the question. My best guess give the little information above is 450-465hp at the crank.
__________________
Jeff Chambers
1990 Mustang GT 10.032 Seconds / 137.5 MPH
14-time Street Warrior World Record Setter
CRT Performance
2001 Tropic Green Mustang GT - 12.181 / 113.2 MPH
2002 Ford F-250 Crew Cab 7.3l Power Stroke - 17.41@77.2

"There's nothing boring about a small block automatic shifting gears at 9400 rpm!"
Jeff Chambers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2005, 02:01 PM   #6
red82gt
Sober voice of Reason
 
red82gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Kelowna, B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,514
Default Re: is my engine builder on drugs?

With TFS heads, 10:1 compression, a decent set of longtubes, an Air gap, and a properly specced hydraulic roller cam ~425+hp, thrown together with off the shelf parts, 375-400.
Also, how much experience does your engine builder have with stroked small block fords? My machinist doesn't do a lot of small block hi-po fords, but is a capable machinist-I'll give him the specs, he'll do the machine work, I'll put it together.
My machinist wasn't even aware that with a 3.85" stroker crank, stock length 351W rods, and 302 comp. height pistons, you can build a nice windsor stroker. I'm betting that after doing all the 383 chevys he's done, he'll be pretty surprised to find out what these windsors are capable of.
__________________
393W: AFR 205's, hydraulic roller, TKO600.
red82gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2005, 02:25 PM   #7
Fat0eknee
I'm slow ...I know.
 
Fat0eknee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: houston
Posts: 518
Default Re: is my engine builder on drugs?

he said he would find the cam to best suit my needs
the heads are untouched straight out of the box TFS twisted wedge heads

this is exactly what he said - "these heads on a 347 you will see all of 350 horsepower" he also said he forgot the dyno numbers from the last 347 he did but that was his guess ...im not sure if he was talkin about at the wheels or flywheel hp

what i was thinkin was to make about 400 with that setup ..anybody have a cam suggestion
ive messed up enough as it is and i want to do my motor right this time around

ive yet to order the rest of my parts - the only thing im certain on is that i have the TFS heads and he is building the 347 up for me
i can still make changes to my intake/cam/carb selection at this point
Fat0eknee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2005, 02:32 PM   #8
Fat0eknee
I'm slow ...I know.
 
Fat0eknee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: houston
Posts: 518
Default Re: is my engine builder on drugs?

BTW thanks for the responses guys
Fat0eknee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2005, 03:20 PM   #9
Rev
Registered Member
 
Rev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Houston, Tx.
Posts: 3,887
Default Re: is my engine builder on drugs?

My guess is for a good street engine with the components you listed, 1.1-1.2 HP/CID. That's if it is tuned well with electric fans, crank scraper/windage tray, under drive pulleys, good electronic ignition, etc.

That would be in the neighborhood of 400 HP. I'm assuming something like a CC Extreme Energy cam or equivalent. So I agree with everyone else, say 375-425 HP.

Rev
__________________
'66 Coupe, 306, 350-375 HP, C-4, 13.07 e.t., 104.8 mph, 1/4 mi.

O.B.C. #2


'66 coupe
Rev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2005, 05:09 PM   #10
andy669
Registered Member
 
andy669's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Moline Il
Posts: 901
Default Re: is my engine builder on drugs?

Quote:
Originally Posted by red82gt
and a properly specced hydraulic roller cam
What exactly is a 'properly specced' cam anyway? The fact is if you talk to 4 different cam designers, you are going to get 4 different cams. They all have their ideas on the best way to fill the cylinder. I know this for a fact because right now I have 3 cams sitting on the shelf that are all 'properly specced', and 1 in my engine that supposedly is. I even took a huge variable out of their equation as my class rules limit me to a maximum of 1/2 inch of lift, but yet all 4 'properly specced' cams are entirely different. The one that is actually 'properly specced' is the 1 that goes the fastest at the track.

Theres plenty of shelf cams out there that would work great with an unported TFS Twisted Wedge. Most of the variables rely on how you are going to use this car. Is it a quarter mile only car, mainly strip with a little street driving, mainly street, etc... A 270 degree at .050 cam might work great at the track, but requires alot of valve spring pressure which doesnt necessarily make it the best street cam. Unless you are in to replacing springs and lifters often.

For the service you get before and after the sale, Anderson Ford Motorsport has the best shelf cams available. They also have matching springs for their cams. They have tried this stuff and they know what works. Unlike some people who find ways to make horsepower and keep in to themselves, AFM markets and sells their findings.

Andy
__________________
88 coupe

91 LX NMRA Pure Street 5120
andy669 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2005, 07:00 PM   #11
red82gt
Sober voice of Reason
 
red82gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Kelowna, B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,514
Default Re: is my engine builder on drugs?

What I was saying is a cam that is not a mismatch to the rest of the combo, I agree that different people will spec a completely different cam for the same combo with the same requirements but the bottom line is that a properly selected cam is going to make more power than an inappropriate cam. I was just trying to point out to him that picking a big cam isn't always the right solution, no need to read anymore into it.
__________________
393W: AFR 205's, hydraulic roller, TKO600.
red82gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rare Mustangs....Got One? 1969Mach1 Blue Oval Lounge 22 09-25-2010 04:59 AM
Very bad experience with Engine Dynamics of San Jose CA JAGraff Classic Mustangs 8 06-16-2005 11:43 AM
Very bad experience with Engine Dynamics of San Jose CA JAGraff Small Ponies 0 05-12-1999 02:27 AM
Very bad experience with Engine Dynamics of San Jose CA JAGraff Racer's Club House 0 05-12-1999 02:27 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:31 AM.


SEARCH