
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Comox, BC, Canada
Posts: 119
|
But I've got lots more questions
. I've got a truck with the 302, and a few things about this motor are it has a lousy cam and it's speed density. What could be the cheap cheapest way to convert to mass air on this thing? I want to convert to mass air because I also want to replace the cam with a hydraulic roller cam, like the B303 from ford racing. My second question is how much of the valve train will I need to replace when going with this cam? It is 224 intake/exhaust duration and .480 int/ex lift @ .050". I was running it on dyno 2000 and just the cam in the stock motor with small-tube headers and mufflers it produced over 100 horsepower. I went from 180 to about 290. Do these sound like realistic results? I don't know how many of you have used dyno 2000 before, but it seems pretty close--whenever I enter in manufacturers combinations the numbers always closely resemble their dyno results. If this is true then it certainly seems like a cam swap should be the first thing I do! |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| just found this board....gonna post here no one answers on othr board | StangGT02 | Stang Stories | 5 | 07-23-2002 01:51 AM |
| New to the Board, but not Mustangs | MEC89 | Windsor Power | 5 | 02-06-2001 01:54 PM |
| New to the board | 84_GT350 | Classic Mustangs | 1 | 04-14-2000 03:14 PM |
| my new message board!!! | scott9050 | Classic Mustangs | 1 | 03-21-2000 12:24 PM |
