Thread: Speed Secret #6
View Single Post
Old 11-15-2002, 12:26 PM   #5
jim_howard_pdx
Registered Member
 
jim_howard_pdx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 247
Cool

For everyone reading and enjoying the discussions in my speed secret threads, by now you know that I leave things out, or hint at stuff, or downright give you nonsense to see who out there is figuring out the physics and engineering going on in the pursuit of speed and quickness.

If you were following speed secret number 5, I made a completely false point right out of the gate. Finally Go Fast Mercury and Moxie looked up some stuff, thought it over, and commented on the controversy.

Please read my reply to GoFastMercury, because I explain all that I left out of the thread to test you all, get you thinking, discuss the point and understand the implications.

If you don't read this final response of mine, you might make some poor engine building decisions. So go back and look at the end and you will find the actual kernal of information that will make you say AH HA......Now I see the connection......
__________________
1966 Customized for daily street and highway domination. 358 Windsor running 425 HP
C-4 Auto and 3.25 Posi
jim_howard_pdx is offline   Reply With Quote