

© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 4
|
![]() Would the stock bottom end of an 1987 5.0L be able to handle a supercharger pushin 8 PSI and a 175 shot of NOS????
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Jose, California USA
Posts: 275
|
![]() Do you have mass air?
------------------ 1993 Mustang GT - March Ram Air & Pullies, K&N, C&L 73mm MAF, Super Competition Hooker Headers, 2 1/2 in. mandrel bent cat back, High Flow H-Pipe, Pro 5.0 Shifter, 16* Timing Advance |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() I have seen people run both a supercharger & n20,but they weren't using that much nitrous
![]() A guy awhile back,named Nitrous Pete Misinsky,ran a combination using a supercharger and nitrous set-up.I'll have to see if I can find a magazine article about his car.. ------------------ Paxton Blown 87GT ICQ#112698436 |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
The Dude
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 1,262
|
![]() Well, the stock bottom end can hold that supercharger easy, it can even take a little more squeeze. Why don't you put the supercharger on and then see if you still want the nitrous? I don't think that it would be able to handle a 175 shot and the blower, probably only 100 with the blower, if that. You say stock bottom end, are you gonna be putting on better heads/intake? If so, that with the supercharger will be more than enough power for whatever you want to do.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 4
|
![]() I Dont have mass air.
I already have New intake, heads, power Puleys, 3" exhaust, cold air induction, 28lbs jets, fule pump ect. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
The Dude
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 1,262
|
![]() Start with one or the other, if you have the money go out and grab the supercharger. If you want more than that just go with a bigger shot of nitrous instead of the combo
[This message has been edited by dinomite (edited 03-28-2001).] |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 4
|
![]() Ok, so if i were to go with one or the other which one would be best for my engine???
By best I mean which one will put less stress on my bottom end and which will give me the bigger HP boost??? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: winnipeg , manitoba , canada
Posts: 83
|
![]() I beleive you will enjoy the supercharger a whole lot more, its easier on the parts, and its always there, you know, like always, allday long . A 175 shot is a pretty big hit on everything, and at that rate of shot it will be empty very quickly.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 4
|
![]() OK
Thanks for all the help. I went to a performance shop today and they said the same thing. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How do stock bottom ends stand double the cylinder pressure? | Rev | Blue Oval Lounge | 12 | 07-27-2002 01:33 AM |
bbk unequals and stock H pipe :( | scale | Windsor Power | 4 | 06-14-2002 11:41 AM |
Stock No More | Stroked408 | Windsor Power | 9 | 06-12-2002 08:19 PM |
Is a Ported Stock Intake Worth It? | Stang_Crazy | Windsor Power | 9 | 09-28-2001 04:22 PM |
LT's vs. shorties vs. stock headers | jonnyk | Windsor Power | 9 | 01-01-2001 11:28 AM |