MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 04-20-2001, 01:09 AM   #1
84stangLX
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question full length or standard length subframe connectors?

I'm going to be buying a chassis brace kit, probably from maximum motorsports and was wondering whether full length subframe connectors are worth the $40 extra. The engine i want to build will be a high torque 351 stroked/bored to 427ci, so everything i'm buying now is aimed at this. I'm not worried about investing more in my mustang, but i don't want to put money where it's not needed. The thing that concerned me is that they said the full lengths are thinner than standard length connectors and have special reinforcements at possible bend areas whereas the regular length is pretty thick so it doesn't come with any reinforcement, but they say full lengths are stronger. Should i go ahead and buy the full lengths? Any ideas? thanks

------------------
'84 Mustang 5.0 T5, FMS aluminum radiator & 180* t-stat, 1 5/8 shortys/2.5" duals, '88 GT tail lights and wheels, Holley 4160 4 BBL, FMS smog pump idler
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2001, 02:31 AM   #2
84stangLX
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

another setup i was thinking of getting was the Kenny Brown Extreme sub system that also has an option of regular or full length connectors.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2001, 09:25 AM   #3
Skankin
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,349
Post

The front subframe doesn't look much stronger than the floorpan... I'd go for the full length, and tie the suspension pick-ups together.

I've got the Western Motorsports SFC's. Griggs, Global West, Maximum Motorsports & Kenny Brown all have decent SFC's.

I wouldn't bother with the ladder/matrix bracing though... it looks like a lot of added weight, for little benefit. If you think you need it, you should go for a roll bar (that'll really add to the torsional rigidity). Some of the 4 pts aren't that intrusive, but a 6 pt would certainly be better. Kenny Brown's RB doesn't look like it'd get in the way... it's thinner & lighter, but doesn't cut it for some of the faster NHRA rules. For street/autocross, it looks pretty good.
Skankin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2001, 10:53 AM   #4
Mad Horse
Registered Member
 
Mad Horse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Dayton, OH., United States
Posts: 467
Post

I just got some WMS xtrac subframes and they are full length. They are not thin by any means. They are made of 2" round roll bar caging and are about 4 to 4.5' long. I got them from www.wmsracing.com for about $105.00 including shipping.

------------------
88GT 5-speed
Mods: Cervinis Ram air hood 3.73 gears, King Cobra clutch, Pro 5.0, March alum. Pullies, DynoMax Cat-back, WMS Xtrac subframes, 16" Ponies.
"Nip it in the Bud"
My Webpage
Mad Horse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2001, 03:48 PM   #5
84stangLX
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Thanks, those western motorsports subframes look nice and beefy ! I'll definately get those, thank you guys, i didn't even know about Western until you guys guided me to the light!
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Subframe connectors, full length vs. standard flyin 5.8 Windsor Power 2 10-01-2002 09:41 AM
Full length or shorties? Nicodemus Small Ponies 5 08-04-2002 10:55 AM
MM subframes....standard or full length? DemonGT Windsor Power 3 04-22-2002 09:38 AM
A bottom-line questioning topic on subframe connectors. SlowStang2 Windsor Power 3 08-15-2001 05:39 PM
Standard or full length subframes? Chris_H Windsor Power 6 01-10-2001 10:03 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 AM.


SEARCH