MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 06-20-2007, 06:51 PM   #1
theracinjason
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9
Default TFS intake

Which intake is better for this combo:
347, 11:1 compression, tfs stage 2 cam, tfs track heat twisted wedge heads. c-4 trans. long tube headers, 3" pro-chamber and 3" dumps. stang is never driven on the street.
is the tfs track heat enough or do i need to step up to the tfs-R?
bear in mind, the motor never gets revved past 6200
theracinjason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2007, 09:29 AM   #2
tmoss
Registered Member
 
tmoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 634
Default Re: TFS intake

since it's a track car, I'd go with the R. It may make less average power, but if you can keep the power in the sweet band with the drive train, you'll ET better.
__________________
Tom (Torque) Moss
88Gt 5spd Vert, FLowmaster Catbacks, stock cam advanced 4° @ 108.5° ICL, NMRA prepped GT40P heads 1.85/1.55 valves and 1.7 rockers, MAC P headers Jet-Hot coated, 97 Exlporer intake (ported lower), TB and injectors. 277RWHP/330RWTQ (SAE).

http://www.fastlanecars.com/
tmoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 02:17 PM   #3
USMC302
Registered Member
 
USMC302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Gallatin, Tn
Posts: 1,326
Default Re: TFS intake

Ever thought about a spider intake? Or I could get you a Vortech/Saleen style intake with an extrude honed bottom.
__________________
USMC302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 03:29 PM   #4
theracinjason
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9
Default Re: TFS intake

Actually, yes i have contemplated a spyder. Its just that i've had good results with TFS products. im already running a track heat, so i was wondering what everybody else is doing. the whole reason to this was that even with my 302, edelbrock headed motor, it slowed down dramatically if i revved it past 5500. and with the 347 its still the same way. the only things left i did not change are the intake and the torque convertor. i know an ideal torque for a 302 will be way too loose on the 347, but i ran it as is just to see where i was. last weekend i was rewarded with a best of 7.162@94 in the 1/8th. also with a 1.52 60'. and at 1950' density altitude. even though this is smokin with a n/a small motor, i think there is more to be had with a little more rpms. even though, i will not rev past 6200-6300 because i dont want to replace it every hundred passes. all in all i'm pretty happy with where it runs now. thx, Jay
theracinjason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 03:35 PM   #5
USMC302
Registered Member
 
USMC302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Gallatin, Tn
Posts: 1,326
Default Re: TFS intake

7.10's aren't bad, you're moving with those times. Do you have stock ignition or stock valve springs? They will both limit you to the power loss above 5500...
__________________
USMC302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 03:44 PM   #6
theracinjason
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9
Default Re: TFS intake

no, i have an MSD and an Anderson PMS. the valve springs are not stock TFS twisted wedge, i dont remember what Virgil put in them. the old motor had edelbrock springs and they were new. its not really a valve float problem. when i say slowed dramatically i mean a few hundredths, maybe half a tenth. for a bracket racer like me, thats a bunch. it is very very consistant, last weekend in eliminations it ran a 7.218, then a 225 a 223, and a 227. thats 4 within a hundredth. and no delay box. too bad the driver got a case of red eye. another thing to remember, this motor only has 34 passes on it. there's about a half a tenth left in only wearing in and the fact that i have not switched to the full synthetic oil yet. my ultimate goal is under 7 no power adder, even a 6.99999999999 is still under 7 i got some video clips at home if ur interested, they're not the greatest but ok.
theracinjason is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What intake should i get? SmokinStangGT Windsor Power 5 06-25-2003 04:16 PM
best way to match intake ports on heads and intake LX XLR8R Windsor Power 7 06-15-2002 02:00 PM
Bullit intake vs. 02 GT intake??? StangGT2002 Modular Madness 2 03-26-2002 03:58 PM
sn95 Cobra intake vs older sn93 Cobra intake Fordman50 Windsor Power 2 03-17-2001 01:09 AM
diffrence between short runner intake and long runner intake serg Windsor Power 2 01-14-2001 07:12 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:00 PM.


SEARCH