![SEARCH](http://www.mustangworks.com/images/search.png)
![The Mustang Works](http://www.mustangworks.com/images/mw_footer_logo.gif)
© Copyright 1995 thru 2008 - The Mustang Works™. All Rights Reserved.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
MustangWorks.com is designed and hosted by Aero3 Media.
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sunny, Hot, Sebring, Florida
Posts: 725
|
![]() Whats the fastest a naturally aspirated 5.0 can run with Bone stock heads, cam, and intake, with any other bolt ons, and I mean BONE STOCK heads, no head work whatsoever.
gears, pullies, MAF, etc.....are fine. NO POWER ADDERS EITHER. ![]()
__________________
Remember...2nd place is 1st place for losers! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
I'd rather be basketweaving
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,551
|
![]() full weight or not?
what about concrete in the hatch? ![]() 5500rpm launch on slicks, with 4.30 gears, no AC and severely lightened, all boltons available- I'd say mid 12's we all know that you have run your close to stock stang in the 12's, so why start this thread?
__________________
NMRA O/C 9516 NA pumpgas stickshift 347 10.65@125.6, 6.73@100, 1.41 60ft |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sunny, Hot, Sebring, Florida
Posts: 725
|
![]() I mean full weight, with A/C, from the factory, no gutting, etc.
It's nice to know that "you all know" about me, didn't realize that. The reason I started this thread is because I'm into making a "stock" car fast, and I'm good at it, I was looking for new thoughts and opinions thats all, I guess I can see your point, "Here he goes again with that stock heads, cam...." LOL! Thats probably why I'm not getting any replies, I understand. Sorry, I don't read the magazines anymore, and I don't get to the track much anymore either, you guys are pretty much my only source of Mustang info, except for a few buddy's back home. And all the other stang sites suck. So what do you think, full weight and all....... I'm tellin' ya! that concrete tip I offered works! ![]()
__________________
Remember...2nd place is 1st place for losers! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
I'd rather be basketweaving
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,551
|
![]() ok, well what about other tricks like short belts, filing the plugs, running 1 quart low on oil, airing the front tires up.. etc?
Or do you want it to be a straight off of the highway and into the staging lanes type car?
__________________
NMRA O/C 9516 NA pumpgas stickshift 347 10.65@125.6, 6.73@100, 1.41 60ft |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Registered Member
Join Date: May 1999
Posts: 5,246
|
![]() Phenominal driver, full weight, solid factory performer, all the tricks, bolt ons, gears, slicks, bone stock engine, high 12's@104 maybe?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
I'd rather be basketweaving
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,551
|
![]() you also didnt say whether or not it can have 11.5:1 compression either
![]()
__________________
NMRA O/C 9516 NA pumpgas stickshift 347 10.65@125.6, 6.73@100, 1.41 60ft |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered Member
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ocean City , Maryland
Posts: 344
|
![]() There are many a tuner out there that could dispute how low you can go ! you can definitely hit the higher 12's . and that by no means is slow . And like a smart stang driver . you have to have the components ,to make yourself quick
![]()
__________________
1991 5.0 NotchBack,Black as of 05/04/09 34,300mi. 2001 LIGHTNING Black 29,872 mi. 05/04/09 (Hangar Queen) SMOKEM UP |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|