What wouls sound better and what are the performance differ's

4.6l-eatr · 02-26-2002, 08:41 PM

I just won an auction on ebay for 107.51 for a off road h pipe with 2 chamber flows welded on it with turn downs? Will this sound good or would it sound better all the way out tail pipes? And what way would i get better performance? Oh yeah on a stock 91 gt Thanks Cory

4.6l-eatr · 02-26-2002, 10:59 PM

Anyone??

BowTie Eater 5 Liter · 02-27-2002, 12:33 AM

well, i think you would want tailipes because of the poisionous gasses that may enter the car, and tailpipes(from what im told) help torque. im nit sure which would sound better though.

02-26-2002, 08:41 PM	#1
4.6l-eatr Registered Member Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Janesville Wi Posts: 33	What wouls sound better and what are the performance differ's I just won an auction on ebay for 107.51 for a off road h pipe with 2 chamber flows welded on it with turn downs? Will this sound good or would it sound better all the way out tail pipes? And what way would i get better performance? Oh yeah on a stock 91 gt Thanks Cory

02-27-2002, 12:33 AM	#3
BowTie Eater 5 Liter Registered Member Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Maple Ridge B.C. Canada, The Best Place In The World Posts: 871	well, i think you would want tailipes because of the poisionous gasses that may enter the car, and tailpipes(from what im told) help torque. im nit sure which would sound better though. __________________ 1984 Bronco II, 36" Michelin Military Tires, 95 EFI 5.0, NP435 Tranny, NP208 Doubler, NP205 Transfer Case, Fill Size Solid Dana 44 Front End, WH Progressive Rate Rock Crawling Coils, Bronco 8.8 Rear, Skyjacker Softride Leafs, 5.13 Gears, Detroit Locker. Final Crawl Ratio Of 175:1 88 GT Best 60ft. 2.181 Best ET 14.350 Best MPH 98.01 ~WRECKED!!!!~

02-26-2002, 10:59 PM	#2
4.6l-eatr Registered Member Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Janesville Wi Posts: 33	Anyone??