MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 11-17-2001, 09:32 PM   #1
Nitrous Al
Registered Member
 
Nitrous Al's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Everett, MA
Posts: 417
Question What's the best intake manifold for an engine that only revs up to 5000 rpms?

This question will probably get locked out, but no one goes into the Ford Truck Forum. What is the best 4bbl. intake manifold for a street engine that only revs to 5,000 rpms? I plan on sitting this intake on top of a pair of E7 Mustang 5.0 heads.
__________________
Nitrous Al
Nitrous Al is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2001, 10:03 PM   #2
gtsr515
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sunny, Hot, Sebring, Florida
Posts: 725
Default

A Edelbrock Performer would be good, don't get the "RPM Performer" thats for up to 6500, get the plain jane "Performer"
__________________
Remember...2nd place is 1st place for losers!
gtsr515 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2001, 10:25 PM   #3
dinomite
The Dude
 
dinomite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 1,262
Default

anything with long runners; long runners give you more low end torgue, sacrificing flow at high rpms. For your purposes, that is what you want.
dinomite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2001, 10:56 PM   #4
Mach 1
Registered Member
 
Mach 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Georgia
Posts: 3,866
Default

also, you want a "dual plane", not a "single plane"
__________________
2002 GT
1993 GT (SOLD)
'93 Mustang GT
RHC member #142
Mach 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2001, 05:20 AM   #5
PKRWUD
Junior Member
 
PKRWUD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Ventura, California
Posts: 8,981
Default

I would go with the RPM. The regular Performer isn't much more than an aluminum stock manifold. The RPM is designed with a higher rpm band in mind, but because it's a dual plane manifold, it doesn't give up any bottom end or off idle responsiveness. It also allows for any future mods you may decide to add.

Take care,
-Chris
__________________
Webmaster:
Rice Haters Club
Jim Porter Racing
Peckerwoods Pit Stop


Support Your Local
RED & WHITE!
PKRWUD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2001, 12:00 AM   #6
dinomite
The Dude
 
dinomite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 1,262
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by dinomite
anything with long runners; long runners give you more low end torgue, sacrificing flow at high rpms. For your purposes, that is what you want.

Good point......I hadn't even noticed that he was talking carb!
dinomite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2001, 04:32 AM   #7
Mach 1
Registered Member
 
Mach 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Georgia
Posts: 3,866
Default

doesnt matter....same thing applies to Fuel Injection.
__________________
2002 GT
1993 GT (SOLD)
'93 Mustang GT
RHC member #142
Mach 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2001, 02:36 PM   #8
Chevyguy
Backyard Mechanic/Chemist
 
Chevyguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Acton MA USA
Posts: 435
Default

I would not put the RPM manifold on a truck, stick to the performer. At least with a Chevy the performer gives a nice boost compared to a stock intake, the performer package sucks cus the perfomer cam is really wimpy basically a stock cam.

So get the Edelbrock performer, maybe a good 4x4 grind cam too.
__________________
2001 Crown Vic Maurader Airbox/MAF, DR chip Edel IAS shocks Single exhaust :wtf:

93 P-71 Vic interceptor Backup car now

90 5.0 LX Notch SOLD

74 Chevy Laguna type S-3 454 under construction
Currently apart undergoing bodywork.
Chevyguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2001, 04:12 PM   #9
haulin'balz
The Notorious One
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 51
Default

The "plain jane" Performer works for me
__________________
1990 5.0 LX Hatch - all the usuals and much more. Running low 12's @ 112-115mph (1.78 60') all day long!

Damn this thing's fast!!!

[url]"http://www.mustangworks.com/cgi-bin/moi-display.cgi?1959"my ride[url]
haulin'balz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2001, 05:31 PM   #10
exgmguy
Registered Member
 
exgmguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Utica, Michigan
Posts: 2,631
Default

Put my vote in for the Performer!
__________________
1988 Mustang GT
stock bottom 302, C4
10.9 @ 128 with 8 psi of Novi 1000 boost!----STOLEN

1989 Mustang notchback
Warmed up 306 with a Procharger.
exgmguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rare Mustangs....Got One? 1969Mach1 Blue Oval Lounge 22 09-25-2010 04:59 AM
raced a Supra Twin Turbo Stang35th Stang Stories 63 08-23-2003 12:36 AM
Need to replace intake manifold... what to do...? GaryDawg Modular Madness 4 03-05-2003 02:49 PM
Intake Manifold ?'s Tbird8450 Windsor Power 6 04-18-2001 01:23 PM
intake manifold selection yusuf Windsor Power 0 03-05-2001 04:07 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31 PM.


SEARCH