MustangWorks.com - The Ford Mustang Power Source!

Go Back   MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums > Mustang & Ford Tech > Windsor Power
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Old 02-26-2003, 11:34 PM   #1
Katmandu
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Troy, Ohio
Posts: 38
Question WHY A9L EEC "only" for SD --> MAF Conversion ??

Why does the EEC "need" to be from JUST a A9L GT only ??

Wouldn't another EEC-IV from another application work instead ?

Why couldn't any of these (below) work ??

OEM Binaries

A9L - 89-93 5.0L Mustang 5-spd
A3M - 93 5.0L Mustang 5-spd
A3M1 - 93 5.0L Mustang 5-spd
X3Z - 93 5.0L Cobra 5-spd
A9P - 89-93 5.0L Mustang Auto
A9S - 88-93 5.0L Mustang California
C3W - 89-93 5.0L Mustang Auto
DA1 - 87 5.0L Mustang 5-spd
J4J1 - 94-95 5.0L SVT Cobra 5-spd
T4M0 - 94-95 5.0L GT Vert 5-spd
U4P0 - 94-95 5.0L GT Auto
WH40 - 94-95 5.0L GT
ZA0 - 95 Cobra R
D9S - Lincoln LSC
ZXA3
LLX3
CCA1
CCA0
AOL2
AOL3

The above info was obtained from;

-->> EEC-IV Tech info from Tom Cloud <<---
Katmandu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2003, 12:01 AM   #2
88workcar
Registered Member
 
88workcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Pierre Part, La. U.S.A.
Posts: 1,850
Cool

I would think that any one of them would work. Why are you converting?
__________________
88workcar
1988 Mustang LX 342. 417rwhp @ 6800. 28 X 10 ET Drag, 4.30s, 10.69 @ 126.43 1.42 60ft. 11.13 @ 127.7 on BFGs 1.72 60ft
Rice Hater # 42
To be old and wise, You must first be young and stupid I'm somewhere in tthe middle.
88workcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2003, 12:15 AM   #3
Katmandu
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Troy, Ohio
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
I would think that any one of them would work. Why are you converting?
MAF has better throttle response and better able to adapt to engine upgrades.
Katmandu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2003, 12:47 AM   #4
srv1
Get down.....
 
srv1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Room 103
Posts: 2,095
Exclamation SD vs. MAF Round 1

Quote:
Originally posted by Katmandu
MAF has better throttle response and better able to adapt to engine upgrades.
uh oh! here we go!
__________________
Cobra brakes are on! Finally.....
------------------------------------------------
srv1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2003, 02:38 AM   #5
Tamer
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Surrey, BC, Canada
Posts: 19
Default

None of the 94/95 computers or the lincoln computers will work because it just dont haha dont ask me why. Ive tried and it just doesnt work. Now your better off just getting the A9L computer there the most common. You can use them in any conversion that you want to do. sometimes its better not to ask questions and just do it
Tamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2003, 06:58 AM   #6
88workcar
Registered Member
 
88workcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Pierre Part, La. U.S.A.
Posts: 1,850
Cool

SRV1- I'm not gonna do it.
__________________
88workcar
1988 Mustang LX 342. 417rwhp @ 6800. 28 X 10 ET Drag, 4.30s, 10.69 @ 126.43 1.42 60ft. 11.13 @ 127.7 on BFGs 1.72 60ft
Rice Hater # 42
To be old and wise, You must first be young and stupid I'm somewhere in tthe middle.
88workcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2003, 09:54 AM   #7
Katmandu
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Troy, Ohio
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Tamer
None of the 94/95 computers or the lincoln computers will work because it just dont haha dont ask me why. Ive tried and it just doesnt work. Now your better off just getting the A9L computer there the most common. You can use them in any conversion that you want to do. sometimes its better not to ask questions and just do it
OK..... Looks like I've stirred up the Hornet's nest here.

How about the details.

Are the fuel tables in the EEC-IV the only consideration (other than changing Pinouts ??)

I'm not buying the fact that the A9L is the ONLY EEC-IV that'll work for this conversion. As we know, they're getting harder to find and expensive when you do find one.

So WHY are they considered the BEST/ONLY EEC-IV that will work ?? I'd really like to know....
Katmandu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2003, 01:17 PM   #8
Murdock
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 100
Default

Any of them will work. Just stay in the ECM family that is for your year or body style:

A9L -- 88-93 Mustang (5-speed)
includes A9L, A3M, A3M1, D3D1, X3Z, S0Z

A9M -- 88-93 Mustang (auto)
includes A9M, A9P, C3W, C3W1

A9S -- 88-93 Mustangs (CA.)
includes A9S, 8LD

ZA0 -- 94-95 Mustang
includes T4M0, U4P0, W4H0, J4J1, ZA0

Murdock
__________________
LARZRACECARS
larzracecars.com
Murdock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2003, 12:21 AM   #9
Technick
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, Wa.
Posts: 175
Default

While the 94-95 EEC processor will work there are a few differences that you should be aware of. 1st off the 94-95 EEC was designed for a new model car with some important differences in it. EEC runs a 2 speed electric fan, no big deal. The Major change had to do with Ford trying to deal with a rash of 5 speed trans failures believe it or not. So to address the problem the 94-95 EEC was set up to pull timming out of the ignition on every gear change to soften the "blow " to the trans on shifts. 2nd, timming is pulled out after reaching about 92mph to cut down on the torque load that the trans was seeing in 3-5th gears depending of rear gear ratio. Swaping in a 93 EEC into a 94-95 5.0 usually netted about a .5 sec quarter improvement. Pro-M makes a conversion kit for just such a swap, it also address the electric fan function for the 94-95 that the 93 EEC cannot provide. So I would not use a 94-95 EEc myself unless there just was no other option at the time.
__________________
No matter how much you spend, or how much you prepare, there is ALWAYS someone else faster or quicker than YOU!!!!!!!!!!
Technick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2003, 01:25 AM   #10
Katmandu
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Troy, Ohio
Posts: 38
Thumbs up

Good info!

Quote:
So to address the problem the 94-95 EEC was set up to pull timming out of the ignition on every gear change
So what about 89-93 EEC-IV with Automatic Transmissions ?? Any differences there ??

Why won't the 89-93 Mark VII EEC-IVs work ???
Katmandu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2003, 02:57 AM   #11
Gearbanger
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Posts: 12
Default

The 94-95 computers (T4MO) will work..... but you have to re-pin the injector wires. Just look at the 87-93 pin-out and the 94-95 pin-outs to see the difference....

I know because when I initially converted my 86 to Mass-air, I only had a 95 5 spd processor. Now running the 9AL....

Teddy
__________________
Gearbanger says: If you can't find em, grind em.
Gearbanger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2008, 08:22 PM   #12
permawired
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2
Default Re: WHY A9L EEC "only" for SD --> MAF Conversion ??

Was there just a timing change on the CA computers, or was there also a wiring difference from the A9M?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Murdock View Post
Any of them will work. Just stay in the ECM family that is for your year or body style:

A9L -- 88-93 Mustang (5-speed)
includes A9L, A3M, A3M1, D3D1, X3Z, S0Z

A9M -- 88-93 Mustang (auto)
includes A9M, A9P, C3W, C3W1

A9S -- 88-93 Mustangs (CA.)
includes A9S, 8LD

ZA0 -- 94-95 Mustang
includes T4M0, U4P0, W4H0, J4J1, ZA0

Murdock
permawired is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2008, 08:40 PM   #13
88workcar
Registered Member
 
88workcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Pierre Part, La. U.S.A.
Posts: 1,850
Default Re: WHY A9L EEC "only" for SD --> MAF Conversion ??

Permawired Check the dates on a post before u reply, That one was from 02 or 03. But then I replied so u never know.
__________________
88workcar
1988 Mustang LX 342. 417rwhp @ 6800. 28 X 10 ET Drag, 4.30s, 10.69 @ 126.43 1.42 60ft. 11.13 @ 127.7 on BFGs 1.72 60ft
Rice Hater # 42
To be old and wise, You must first be young and stupid I'm somewhere in tthe middle.
88workcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2008, 09:10 PM   #14
permawired
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2
Default Re: WHY A9L EEC "only" for SD --> MAF Conversion ??

Quote:
Originally Posted by 88workcar View Post
Permawired Check the dates on a post before u reply, That one was from 02 or 03. But then I replied so u never know.
Sorry about that. I'm sure you know how it goes after 6 beers and 3 hours of reading online Long story short, I found out what I needed. I'll post how my car turns out over this next month or two. Going to be dropping in a GT40 upper and lower intake with GT40P heads (with 1.7 roller rockers on em and refurb injectors) that have been ported. I've also got a bassani X-pipe and will have the mac headers in a couple weeks. I'm interested to see how it all turns out, wish me luck.

After all the computer info I've read over the last couple weeks I'm going to just get a TwEECer to tune the comp to start...
permawired is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2008, 02:30 PM   #15
88workcar
Registered Member
 
88workcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Pierre Part, La. U.S.A.
Posts: 1,850
Default Re: WHY A9L EEC "only" for SD --> MAF Conversion ??

Good deal, keep us posted, need any help let me know.
__________________
88workcar
1988 Mustang LX 342. 417rwhp @ 6800. 28 X 10 ET Drag, 4.30s, 10.69 @ 126.43 1.42 60ft. 11.13 @ 127.7 on BFGs 1.72 60ft
Rice Hater # 42
To be old and wise, You must first be young and stupid I'm somewhere in tthe middle.
88workcar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MAF conversion Jerry77 Windsor Power 6 08-10-2004 07:20 PM
What all do you need to do rear disc conversion w/ SN95 Parts KG88GT Windsor Power 1 07-29-2003 01:45 PM
questions about maf conversion spankaveli Windsor Power 10 10-19-2002 02:46 PM
mass air 87GT conversion greydan Windsor Power 3 01-02-2002 07:57 PM
Baer vs. Ford 5-lug Disc Brake Conversion RMARIANI Windsor Power 3 04-05-2001 03:18 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26 PM.


SEARCH