4 cyl stangs

fordkid68 · 12-09-2002, 06:50 PM

hello evry one.

how fast are the 4 cyl mustangs in stock form. like what kind of ET's do they run. and what kind of engines do they come in. I know they have 2.3 cyl but do they have anything ellse.

thanks
ford kid

mustanggt_50 · 12-10-2002, 12:17 AM

hey ford kid

in stock n/a form the 2.3L 4cyl mustang is quite slow. not to sure of how slow, but id have to quess 19's+ in the 1/4 mile, probably more, but like i said, not sure, what i do know is they are a 2.3 SOHC makin 88hp in 87 to 90 and i believe that was upped to 100-110 in 91 or 92. they get good gas mileage,

, and are fun in the winter, i used to have an 88 5spd, which my brother has now.
But there is also the SVO mustang which was a 2.3 turbo, those things were pretty quick, had like 220-225hp in 86, and i saw them running in the 14's stock, so i guess it all depends on what your lookin at.

12-10-2002, 12:34 AM

does anyone know the hp of a 1983 2.3 n/a??

mustanggt_50 · 12-10-2002, 10:30 AM

the 83 2.3L n/a had 88hp and 118ft/lb tq and had a 1bbl carb

fordkid68 · 12-10-2002, 01:12 PM

mustanggt_50- thanks thats what I wanted to know. so it looks like the best one is the svo mustang. well I am going to call the guy and figure out what one he is selling.

thanks again.
ford kid.

mustanggt_50 · 12-10-2002, 01:18 PM

well if you really want a four cylinder mustang any of the turbo ones are fairly quick the 86 svo being one of them, but u can also buy a decent 5.0 v8

fordkid68 · 12-10-2002, 02:13 PM

well the reason I was looking for 4cyl stang was becouse I am loking for A daily driver(somthing good on gas) while I pull the engine out of my 66. I would love to have A 5.0 but I can't afford to have 2 stang that eat gas.

thanks
ford kid

GodStang · 12-10-2002, 07:48 PM

As far as quarter mile times let me put it this way. I have the slowest v6 mustang in the world and I still beat a 2.3L 4 by about an 1/8 mile last time I was at the strip. I am guessing he ran between 19 and 21 secs. But gas milage wise they are the best. My buddy has one he uses to go to college with. Has tons of miles and still runs and looks good.

fordkid68 · 12-10-2002, 11:21 PM

GodStang- thanks, again thats what I needed to know. and it always helps to have more then one person saying it.

well the guy wasn't home when I called so I guess I try again tomorrow.

thanks
ford kid

BLACK85GT · 12-11-2002, 09:12 PM

I bought a 2.3 stang brand new in 1985. I have to say it was the best car i ever had. I beat the crap out of it and it never, ever gave me any problems, and it was automatic. It went 170,000 miles and i never even took the valve cover off for any reason. It still ran fine when i sold it. I upgraded to a Gt 5.0 and had nothing but problems. lol. An SVO turbo mustang is a different story though. They were not as reliable. Had lots of friends that had em. They can be finnicky, but are worth alot of money because they are more rare.

MidNiteBlu 5.0 · 12-13-2002, 03:17 AM

Tireburner has a 91 2.3 N/A in the 12's.............

in the 1/8

tireburner163 · 12-13-2002, 11:26 PM

actully now that I have my GT.......I'm gonna take the 2.3 to the track and netural drop it off the line at 4500 rpms.......11's baby

BLACK85GT · 12-14-2002, 01:29 AM

I used to neutral drop mine all the time. and the damn trans never broke. The only auto car i had that went that many miles without a tranny rebuild.

Blue GT 5.0 · 12-16-2002, 10:27 AM

Fordkid68......

My first Mustang I bought was a 2.3 hatchback. In stock form they can be a bit slow. With a few simple modifications such as exhaust and intake along with some tuning, they can be quick. Not fast.....quick.

The 2.3's make awesome daily drivers and the motors in them are very tough. If you do want a daily driven car that'll get good gas mileage then definatly get one. I'd suggest a 91-93 because factory modifications were done to up the HP slightly. Try and find a notchback.......

fordkid68 · 12-16-2002, 09:59 PM

well now the situation has changed. I am not pulling the motor to rebuild it infact the insurance is taking my car.(because off the accident I hade about 3 weeks ago) any ways so now it's time to start looking for A new stang. unfortinatly my dad wont let me got A 5.0 he says that the rear wheels slip out to easily. so now the question is do any of you guys know of A site on the internet to look at classic cars( stangs) for sale. autotrader.com doesn't go back fare anough. so is there anything ellse.

thanks
ford kid

mustanggt_50 · 12-16-2002, 10:13 PM

i think its all in how you drive it as to whether the rear end will slip out on you. i know alot of ppl with older mustangs(69 coupe, and a 70 mach 1) that the rear end slips out on pretty easy. in the rain if you tromp it, sure its gonna go nuts, you just gotta have a head on your shoulder and take care when driving. also when its dry if you get on to it, just dont rev it up and dump it, launch it properly and it shouldnt go out on you to bad, at least no in stock form. im not sure with heavily modded cars how they react cause i never drove one, but i know with my dads stang it runs well into the 13's and i have no prob keepin it straight, thats just what i think about the rear end slippin out. then again i know i guy whose stang runs 14's and he cant keep it straight, so your dad might be right, but from what i have experienced you shouldnt have a major problem fordkid

lilmustang boy · 12-30-2002, 12:18 AM

i have a 2.3 and it will pull pretty good as far as im concerned...
u can lite ur tires up if u wanted and i have seen it happen............
but with those engine u can pull 400+ ponies (no pun intended) out of them

84LX89GT · 12-30-2002, 03:07 AM

If you want to kind of trick your dad you can buy a Lincoln Mark VII LSC, which is basically a luxury mustang (225hp 5.0L w/AOD trans) or buy a thunderbird ('83 to '88 are fox body, as well as hideous '81-'82 box models) or some other fox body ford if you want to bolt on 5.0L mustang parts. Basically ANY V8 car with limited slip will kick the rear end out and i'd say trucks are way worse than mustangs because you can regain control easier with a mustang than a 70/30 weight ratio truck.

I'd say a steady foot controls most of rear end kicking out unless it's on ice. If you bought a Mark VII you could tell him there's alot more weight in the rear and it's heavier (which it is).

Just some ideas

I can't think of a classic car that doesn't kick the rearend out with any kind of power, so i can't really help you out there. Maybe you can convince him to let you have a 351C Torino or something

Good luck on your car hunting.

12-09-2002, 06:50 PM	#1
fordkid68 Registered Member Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: fremont Posts: 306	4 cyl stangs hello evry one. how fast are the 4 cyl mustangs in stock form. like what kind of ET's do they run. and what kind of engines do they come in. I know they have 2.3 cyl but do they have anything ellse. thanks ford kid

12-10-2002, 12:17 AM	#2
mustanggt_50 Registered Member Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Ontario Canada Posts: 91	hey ford kid in stock n/a form the 2.3L 4cyl mustang is quite slow. not to sure of how slow, but id have to quess 19's+ in the 1/4 mile, probably more, but like i said, not sure, what i do know is they are a 2.3 SOHC makin 88hp in 87 to 90 and i believe that was upped to 100-110 in 91 or 92. they get good gas mileage, , and are fun in the winter, i used to have an 88 5spd, which my brother has now. But there is also the SVO mustang which was a 2.3 turbo, those things were pretty quick, had like 220-225hp in 86, and i saw them running in the 14's stock, so i guess it all depends on what your lookin at. __________________ 87 GT T-roof (needs paint) lol, rebuilt motor and trans, AOD - stage 2 shift kit, 3.73 gears - auburn posi, Dynomax Super Turbo Cat Back, FRPP 155lph fuel pump, K&N filter - air silencer removed, subframe connectors, strut tower brace. 88 GT T-roof 1989 LX Coupe 5.0 - 5spd Rice Haters Club member#105

12-10-2002, 10:30 AM	#4
mustanggt_50 Registered Member Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Ontario Canada Posts: 91	the 83 2.3L n/a had 88hp and 118ft/lb tq and had a 1bbl carb __________________ 87 GT T-roof (needs paint) lol, rebuilt motor and trans, AOD - stage 2 shift kit, 3.73 gears - auburn posi, Dynomax Super Turbo Cat Back, FRPP 155lph fuel pump, K&N filter - air silencer removed, subframe connectors, strut tower brace. 88 GT T-roof 1989 LX Coupe 5.0 - 5spd Rice Haters Club member#105

12-10-2002, 01:18 PM	#6
mustanggt_50 Registered Member Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Ontario Canada Posts: 91	well if you really want a four cylinder mustang any of the turbo ones are fairly quick the 86 svo being one of them, but u can also buy a decent 5.0 v8 __________________ 87 GT T-roof (needs paint) lol, rebuilt motor and trans, AOD - stage 2 shift kit, 3.73 gears - auburn posi, Dynomax Super Turbo Cat Back, FRPP 155lph fuel pump, K&N filter - air silencer removed, subframe connectors, strut tower brace. 88 GT T-roof 1989 LX Coupe 5.0 - 5spd Rice Haters Club member#105

12-10-2002, 07:48 PM	#8
GodStang College Stanger Join Date: May 1999 Location: Aiken,south carolina, usa Posts: 1,097	As far as quarter mile times let me put it this way. I have the slowest v6 mustang in the world and I still beat a 2.3L 4 by about an 1/8 mile last time I was at the strip. I am guessing he ran between 19 and 21 secs. But gas milage wise they are the best. My buddy has one he uses to go to college with. Has tons of miles and still runs and looks good. __________________ 2003 Sonic Blue Cobra

12-10-2002, 12:34 AM	#3
digital3.3 Guest Posts: n/a	does anyone know the hp of a 1983 2.3 n/a??

12-10-2002, 01:12 PM	#5
fordkid68 Registered Member Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: fremont Posts: 306	mustanggt_50- thanks thats what I wanted to know. so it looks like the best one is the svo mustang. well I am going to call the guy and figure out what one he is selling. thanks again. ford kid.

12-10-2002, 02:13 PM	#7
fordkid68 Registered Member Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: fremont Posts: 306	well the reason I was looking for 4cyl stang was becouse I am loking for A daily driver(somthing good on gas) while I pull the engine out of my 66. I would love to have A 5.0 but I can't afford to have 2 stang that eat gas. thanks ford kid

12-10-2002, 11:21 PM	#9
fordkid68 Registered Member Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: fremont Posts: 306	GodStang- thanks, again thats what I needed to know. and it always helps to have more then one person saying it. well the guy wasn't home when I called so I guess I try again tomorrow. thanks ford kid

12-11-2002, 09:12 PM	#10
BLACK85GT Registered Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: Tampa,FLORIDA Posts: 340	I bought a 2.3 stang brand new in 1985. I have to say it was the best car i ever had. I beat the crap out of it and it never, ever gave me any problems, and it was automatic. It went 170,000 miles and i never even took the valve cover off for any reason. It still ran fine when i sold it. I upgraded to a Gt 5.0 and had nothing but problems. lol. An SVO turbo mustang is a different story though. They were not as reliable. Had lots of friends that had em. They can be finnicky, but are worth alot of money because they are more rare. __________________ 5.0, Holley heads, 1.7 Scorp Rockers, Stealth intake, Holley 600 carb, Holley Mech. Fuel pump, MSD 6Digital, MSD distributor, Hotchkis upper/lower rear control arms, FMS B Springs, 3:73 (8.8) rear. Production # 9,377

12-13-2002, 03:17 AM	#11
MidNiteBlu 5.0 I got something to say Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 1,557	Tireburner has a 91 2.3 N/A in the 12's............. in the 1/8 __________________ 91 LX Hatch 5.0 - made for the twisties 89 LX Hatchback 5.0 5spd. stolen/stripped 4/7/05 http://www.mustangworks.com/cgi-bin/...splay.cgi?3494 1987 Toyota Pickup Ricer Haters Club Member #33 Want a custom gauge cluster for your Vintage Mustang? www.jmeenterprises.com

12-13-2002, 11:26 PM	#12
tireburner163 It's a lot like a race car Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Meridian, MS Posts: 4,130	actully now that I have my GT.......I'm gonna take the 2.3 to the track and netural drop it off the line at 4500 rpms.......11's baby __________________ 1987 Buick T-type 1998 HD Electra Elide

12-14-2002, 01:29 AM	#13
BLACK85GT Registered Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: Tampa,FLORIDA Posts: 340	I used to neutral drop mine all the time. and the damn trans never broke. The only auto car i had that went that many miles without a tranny rebuild. __________________ 5.0, Holley heads, 1.7 Scorp Rockers, Stealth intake, Holley 600 carb, Holley Mech. Fuel pump, MSD 6Digital, MSD distributor, Hotchkis upper/lower rear control arms, FMS B Springs, 3:73 (8.8) rear. Production # 9,377

12-16-2002, 10:27 AM	#14
Blue GT 5.0 Registered Member Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: McSherrystown PA (near Gettysburg) Posts: 26	Fordkid68...... My first Mustang I bought was a 2.3 hatchback. In stock form they can be a bit slow. With a few simple modifications such as exhaust and intake along with some tuning, they can be quick. Not fast.....quick. The 2.3's make awesome daily drivers and the motors in them are very tough. If you do want a daily driven car that'll get good gas mileage then definatly get one. I'd suggest a 91-93 because factory modifications were done to up the HP slightly. Try and find a notchback.......

12-16-2002, 09:59 PM	#15
fordkid68 Registered Member Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: fremont Posts: 306	well now the situation has changed. I am not pulling the motor to rebuild it infact the insurance is taking my car.(because off the accident I hade about 3 weeks ago) any ways so now it's time to start looking for A new stang. unfortinatly my dad wont let me got A 5.0 he says that the rear wheels slip out to easily. so now the question is do any of you guys know of A site on the internet to look at classic cars( stangs) for sale. autotrader.com doesn't go back fare anough. so is there anything ellse. thanks ford kid

12-16-2002, 10:13 PM	#16
mustanggt_50 Registered Member Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Ontario Canada Posts: 91	i think its all in how you drive it as to whether the rear end will slip out on you. i know alot of ppl with older mustangs(69 coupe, and a 70 mach 1) that the rear end slips out on pretty easy. in the rain if you tromp it, sure its gonna go nuts, you just gotta have a head on your shoulder and take care when driving. also when its dry if you get on to it, just dont rev it up and dump it, launch it properly and it shouldnt go out on you to bad, at least no in stock form. im not sure with heavily modded cars how they react cause i never drove one, but i know with my dads stang it runs well into the 13's and i have no prob keepin it straight, thats just what i think about the rear end slippin out. then again i know i guy whose stang runs 14's and he cant keep it straight, so your dad might be right, but from what i have experienced you shouldnt have a major problem fordkid __________________ 87 GT T-roof (needs paint) lol, rebuilt motor and trans, AOD - stage 2 shift kit, 3.73 gears - auburn posi, Dynomax Super Turbo Cat Back, FRPP 155lph fuel pump, K&N filter - air silencer removed, subframe connectors, strut tower brace. 88 GT T-roof 1989 LX Coupe 5.0 - 5spd Rice Haters Club member#105

12-30-2002, 12:18 AM	#17
lilmustang boy Registered Member Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 19	i have a 2.3 and it will pull pretty good as far as im concerned... u can lite ur tires up if u wanted and i have seen it happen............ but with those engine u can pull 400+ ponies (no pun intended) out of them __________________ i choose american muscle over japanese scrap metal

12-30-2002, 03:07 AM	#18
84LX89GT Mustangs Join Date: Jul 2000 Posts: 1,938	If you want to kind of trick your dad you can buy a Lincoln Mark VII LSC, which is basically a luxury mustang (225hp 5.0L w/AOD trans) or buy a thunderbird ('83 to '88 are fox body, as well as hideous '81-'82 box models) or some other fox body ford if you want to bolt on 5.0L mustang parts. Basically ANY V8 car with limited slip will kick the rear end out and i'd say trucks are way worse than mustangs because you can regain control easier with a mustang than a 70/30 weight ratio truck. I'd say a steady foot controls most of rear end kicking out unless it's on ice. If you bought a Mark VII you could tell him there's alot more weight in the rear and it's heavier (which it is). Just some ideas I can't think of a classic car that doesn't kick the rearend out with any kind of power, so i can't really help you out there. Maybe you can convince him to let you have a 351C Torino or something Good luck on your car hunting. __________________ 2005 Suzuki Hayabusa GSX1300-R 1980 Ford Thunderbird - 255 V8 ported heads, 5.0L ported stock headers, O.R. H-pipe and Flowmaster 2-chambers, dual roller timing chain hi-po Mack Truck hood emblem 1985 Mustang GT 5.0L T5, F-303, GT40p, headers, off-road h, flowmasters, MSD stuff, etc. Sold 02/06/04 1989 Mustang GT ET: 13.304@102.29 mph (5-24-03) Sold - 1998 Mustang Cobra coupe, 1/4 mile - street tires: 13.843@103.41 (bone stock)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Chick with a love for Stangs...about me	Stang Obsession	Blue Oval Lounge	37	08-11-2002 11:56 PM
Chick with a love for Stangs...about me	Stang Obsession	Blue Oval Lounge	0	08-08-2002 04:53 AM
New WildHorses burnout & doughnut movies - 4 Stangs going wild!	Mikey	Blue Oval Lounge	8	05-05-2002 04:27 AM
What stangs came with the 351's	JM90GT	Blue Oval Lounge	39	12-09-2001 04:47 PM
Thoughts os hood on new stangs....	EZRIDN	Blue Oval Lounge	4	01-05-2001 09:23 PM