![]() |
G-tech accuracy??
how accurate are they??
anyone run one and compare the info to actual track times?? reason i ask, closest track is 2.5 hours away, and with my too many home improvement projects going on, don't think i'll be able to get to the track.. |
On the ET it is pretty accurate +or- a tenth.
The mph is about 3mph high. It got my ET pretty much dead on, I dont know if the mph is off on all cars but it reads mine about 3 mph high compared to the track. Actual ET 13.7 @100mph G-tech ET 13.66@103mph I am in the same boat as you I just bought a house and it is putting a huge financial strain on me. Somehow I still found the cash for slicks.:D Just remember to make sure the G-tech is level and find a straight level street. Good luck Later, |
What Dark_5.0 said seems to be a good rule of thumb. Although, I trapped 111 mph on a G-Tech but usually trap 105-106 at the track. Weird.
E |
Ithinkthereason the g-tech reads higher on the mph is because the g-tech reads the mph the 1/4 mile point but at the track the trap speed is an aver. of the so many feet is more speed/time/dist. figur. more then an on the dot mph
|
My friends and I all pitched in on a g-tech and it was way off. Before the 1994 gt i had a dodge stealth es not turbo or anything and i ran 13.9. that is completly stock... LOL i thought wow this car is fast but it was really the g-tech being a peice of crap. We later found out that the disc was messed up in the tech and it was sent back because of warrenty. Now it is still a little off but not 2 seconds... but i heard good things from other people though so maybe i just had bad luck:p
|
I am in the same boat - 2 hrs from a dyno or track!
been looking at tazzo. check out tazzo.com like the g-tech but suppose to use better guts and the spec's exceed the gtech and vc2000race |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22 PM. |