MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums

MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums (http://forums.mustangworks.com/index.php)
-   Windsor Power (http://forums.mustangworks.com/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Pro-M or C&L?? (http://forums.mustangworks.com/showthread.php?t=30048)

jruppert 10-13-2002 06:51 PM

Pro-M or C&L??
 
I have a '94 GT and have a Pro-M for a MAF. Recently my sensor has gone bad (at least I think it has). I sent it back to Pro-M because I was getting a code for lower then min. voltage. Anyway, they say that if its their fault then they will take care of it. If its my fault then I pay. I have this feeling that it will be upwards around $150 if I have to take care of it. What I have is the 77mm and its calib. for 24lb injectors. Back when I bought this I didnt realize the simplicity of the C&L as far as using the sample tube for the diff size injectors. If its upwards around $150 I am thinking maybe I should hold out and go the C&L because I think those run $190 or so. What do u guys think??

jimberg 10-13-2002 07:18 PM

The problem with the C&L is that you don't get new electronics. You have to have a working stock unit so that you can transfer the electronics. It's kind of a pain in the butt.

Bad89stang 10-13-2002 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jimberg
The problem with the C&L is that you don't get new electronics. You have to have a working stock unit so that you can transfer the electronics. It's kind of a pain in the butt.
Yea, transferring electronics takes about 45 seconds. :confused:
What am I missing here? The C&L meters are awesome... no calibration problems, no B.S.

I paid $58 for mine off of Ebay and it works perfectly. It always will because there is nothing to go bad. Why not switch if you have the $$$.

2FastLX 10-13-2002 08:05 PM

I agree with Jim. He's not saying it's a pain to transfer the electronics. He's saying it's a pain if you don't have the stock electronics. Try buying the sensor for the mass air and see what you come up with. Best I found was buying the complete meter from Auto Zone, but I can't remember how much they were.

As far as which one would I buy? Definately C&L. I currently have the 76mm and love it. It's a well made product, and personally I would rather have this nice machined piece of aluminum than a plastic bullet from Pro-M. And swapping injectors sizes will only cost $35 versus $150 to Pro-M, who I would imagine just swaps your electronics for one they pulled from someone else's meter after charging them $150 to put your electronics on theirs. Plus, I get to keep my old sampling tube in case these injectors don't work out and I want to swap back. With Pro-M there goes another $150. No thanks.

89 ATI 10-13-2002 08:51 PM

Here is another vote for the C&L. I have the 76 mm also and love it. I like the tube that comes with it to replace the old flexible stock rubber piece.

avbcon12 10-13-2002 09:30 PM

please go with the quality pro-m has. i have had nothing but problems with C&L for years.... pro-m's are calibrated for YOUR intake setup, they are not made to just fool the computer with sample tubes.... nothing but headaches and surging idle....

i know they are more expensive but they are well worth it... great customer service too (i live close to them and have had them calibrate my meter to tune it to my intake many times with no hassles).

take care,
adam

jimberg 10-13-2002 10:21 PM

Thanks for clarifying what I was saying, 2FastLX. I suppose I should have mentioned that I am currently using a C&L 76mm with the aluminum air pipe. I didn't have my stock electronics when I bought it and had to hit a used parts dealer for a MAF sensor. Hopefully it will work. If not, I'm gonna have to buy a new, stock replacement and pay a fortune for it. The cost will be more than a Pro-M which does include the electronics.

BTW, I finally got my engine back in and everything back together but then toasted my ECM. $248 for a new one from Ford. Ouch. All the parts places had them on back order and no idea about how long to get one.

jruppert was saying that his MAF has gone bad. It's a Pro-M so you can't really transfer the electronics to a C&L. Hopefully he has a working stock sensor. Some people, however, use the opportunity of a bad MAF sensor to upgrade to something better. If it's your stock sensor that went bad, you are pretty much out of luck if you upgrade to a C&L. I sent an e-mail to the company, BTW, and never received an answer about this dilemma. They really should have electronics available for those who don't have the stock meter.

I have no problem with the quality of the part yet, but there does seem to be some holes in the way you upgrade.

I have a Pro-M 75mm calibrated for 24#ers if you're interested, jruppert.

2FastLX 10-14-2002 01:15 AM

avbcon12 - C&L meters work exactly like the OEM meters do. What is wrong with that? I'd say if you had a C&L that didn't work for you either your stock electronics are at fault, or it's something else. Since these meters work in their own unique ways other problems in your tune may effect each differently creating problems for one meter and not the other. It's not necessarily the meter that is at fault. We chased problems on my car for a long time thinking it was the meter. I even got codes saying the MAS was bad. I had a surging idle, and the engine sputtered between 1000-1500 RPM. It turned out I had a number of problems, including bad O2 sensors, and a vacuum leak.

avbcon12 10-14-2002 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 2FastLX
avbcon12 - C&L meters work exactly like the OEM meters do. What is wrong with that? I'd say if you had a C&L that didn't work for you either your stock electronics are at fault, or it's something else. Since these meters work in their own unique ways other problems in your tune may effect each differently creating problems for one meter and not the other. It's not necessarily the meter that is at fault. We chased problems on my car for a long time thinking it was the meter. I even got codes saying the MAS was bad. I had a surging idle, and the engine sputtered between 1000-1500 RPM. It turned out I had a number of problems, including bad O2 sensors, and a vacuum leak.
thank you but i do know it was the C&L meter... i tried not one but to C&\l meters and brand new electronics...... i also at the same time had my car tuned profesionally and it still had the same problem. i switched to a pro-m meter that was tested and tuned ON my car for the style of intake i was using and with tweeking my car ran perfectly. i cant thank the guys at pro-m enough for that....

take care,
adam

drudis 10-14-2002 02:00 PM

Get a Lincoln Mark VIII 80mm MAF, and have them recalibrate it for ANY size injector for like $125.
I had it done for the S-trim 30#, and then 3 years later for 42#.

Flow specs:
http://www.dariusrudis.com/mustang/stuff/pro-m_42.jpg

LX XLR8R 10-14-2002 02:10 PM

with my pro-m 77 i never had a problem..from what i have heard all the vortech/cl 75mm poeple said were junk but the new 76mm c/l is soposed to be a nicer unit

Superpromustang 10-14-2002 03:20 PM

I am using the 75mm pro-m, since 1997, and i haven't had a bit of trouble with it, I don't know anything about the c&l's, because I've never had one, but my pro-m works just fine

jruppert 10-14-2002 03:50 PM

Thanks for the feedback. I sent the Pro-M back and they will check it out. If its their fault, they will take care of it. If thats the case then I wont worry about it. If they say I need to pay then I will just have them send it back to me and I will go with the C&L. Another thing, does the C&L fit inside the stock container that holds the mass air, filter, etc? Or does it sit alone on the end of the intake tube. I have a '94 remember, and the stock meter is inside the black plastic housing.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 AM.