Twin Turbo 302 Or Blown 351?
 

What do you guys think?
what ever i get will have a TFS intake & TFS heads. if i go 302, i will use the stock cam, & 13psi via an incon twin turbo kit. hp will check in at a healthy 530rwhp with the 302.

------------------
1988 Mustang GT, T-5
3.08's, No Smog Pump (Shorty Belt), Dumps At The End Of Stock H-Pipe, K&N Air Filter (Stock Air Box), Removed Air SilencerMy Stang
My Site (Not Done Yet)

i would go with the 302, but would not go with the stock cam. i would call the manufacturer of the turbo kit and find out what cam they suggest you use, because i have seen a twin turbo 302 with 1032 rwhp. he used a cam form comp cams, and he loves it. good luck with whatever youdecide to do.

incon reccomends the e-303, f-303, or stock cam.

What are you gonna build! Make up your mind. http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/smile.gif

SKy

------------------
-1989 Saleen Mustang #406-
TFS TW Heads, E-303, Edelbrock intake, 70mm TB, 73mm MAF, 24lb injectors, 1 5/8 shorties, Off Road H, 3 Chamber flows, Jaz Race seats, Back seat removed, sub-frames, Roll Cage, and a 150 shot of N20.
12.55@107 Motor

I personally would take the 302 with the twin turbos, you could probably be running 11's with 'em.

I would go with the 302 set up. TDC INC make some alsome kits. In stage 1,2,3 kits. After I graduate Tech school I'm building one bad *** Supra killer, that can handle and stop on a dime and run 9's. Its 331ci with stage3 TDC twin Turbos and a six speed tranny. I like to go for 1000rwhp. Good Luck.

Blown 351! Have you seen how much work and tuning is required on a turbo car? If you have the funds and the know how, nothing is more exotic than a turbo. Why don't you do a 421 cube 351 with a huge 671 blower http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif.

------------------
92 GT, 4:10 gears, centerforce clutch, 6# powerdyne blower, bbk h-pipe, flowmasters

no, how much work is involved? i had NO tuning done to my stock (tb to oil pan) engine with turbos. it drove great. 400rwhp/466rwtq. ran 11.96@119 at 3600lbs. again, bone stock engine.
this year i did heads/intake/tb/rockers. still drove fine. i got a chip burnt to be safe. just took an hour on the dyno.
how much work is it?



------------------
94gt incon tt _ 11.66@124
455rwhp/476rwtq

68 stang 351w _ 12.99@106
my stangs

I can't believe incon said you could use the stoc cam, I'd upgrade if I were you. You should have well over 530 rwhp w/ that set up. Needless to say, I'd go w/ the twin turbo 302. Good luck!

------------------
'90 LX 5.0; 12K original miles (no sh*&); 3.55 gears; pulleys;Edelbrock Performer Heads; BBK shorties; MSD 6AL box w/ blaster 2 coil; Motorsport E303 cam; Pro-M 75mm MAF; BBK 70mm TB; Eibach spring kit; Southside welded subs; K&N cone filter charger; Hurst shifter; fiberglass turbo hood; A/C-less; rear seat-less; cat-less; 2 chamber Flos; Corbeau racing seats (fronts);
30# injectors; JMS Chip; 190 lb fp; TFS track heat Intake (12.299 @ 113)

hey paul302:

how fun is it changing plugs? or do you run platinum?



------------------
88LX notch, Speedpro EFI Procharged!

definitely the TT's

man, the turbo swooooooosh coupled w/ the sounds of a 302 w/ some nice exhaust will be sweeeeeeeeeeeet

plus 11's

------------------
SHaFTed

91GT, 2 chamber flows, dumps, 70MM BBK TB, K&N conical, Robert Shaw tstat, Hurst short throw, T5, 17" Lexani Roma wheels, 235/40/R17 on front, 255/45/R17 on back, mach1 hood, LX tail lights, bright red!

it's not fun at all http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/frown.gif it sucks major *** . it can be done, just don't be in a rush to do it.



------------------
94gt incon tt _ 11.66@124
455rwhp/476rwtq

68 stang 351w _ 12.99@106
my stangs