Mac prochamber or Bassani X-pipe with mac 5/8 longtubes + Am Thunder?
 

Hi there folks

I finally lost patience after 3 hours of mangling my knuckles on shorty headers and ordered some MAC 1 5/8 longtubes to get the flange under the car where it belongs (By the way, I'll be selling the mac 1 5/8 equals and the gt-40p shorty headers soon). Due to a shipping error, instead of the longtubes, I get a box with a mac prochamber (2.5l?) in it. The headers are on their way but I have a great offer from the company to keep the prochamber for quite a good price.

Now originally I was going to take the front sections off my bassani x-pipe (they unclamp and slide out just behind the forward exhaust hangers) and shorten them (get the flange and 2-3 inches of tube and slide back in) to work with my new headers but now I kinda like the way the prochamber looks (and then I'll sell a mint bassani xpipe too). What do you think folks? GT-40P headed NA 600 cfm carbed motor, automatic, 4.56 gears, all street, mid rpm (2000-3000) and american thunder at the other side. Which will serve me better for my application?

Re: Mac prochamber or Bassani X-pipe with mac 5/8 longtubes + Am Thunder?
 

prochamber with longtubes and a carbed motor would scream, will actually be pretty dang loud, so be prepared, but that, in my opinion is a beatiful sound:)

Re: Mac prochamber or Bassani X-pipe with mac 5/8 longtubes + Am Thunder?
 

I'm reading so many good things about that prochamber, I am very tempted to keep it.

But!

When I went to the speed shop last month, the guys outside wanted to look under the car to see what exhaust I was running since it sounded so sweet. You cant mess with that! That was equal shorties + bassani+ thunder

I was wondering more along hp/torque curves in the low-midrange which would be better for numbers.

Re: Mac prochamber or Bassani X-pipe with mac 5/8 longtubes + Am Thunder?
 

I think with either midpipe, you will get about the same power. If there is any difference, it would be neglidgable. In which case, sound preference would come into play, and I think the prochamber sounds awsome!!! I have a 90 gt with your exact exhaust setup, and it sounds good. I had a prochamber and 2 chamber flows on my 01 gt and it sounded much better (except for the lack of lope from the cam in the 90).

Re: Mac prochamber or Bassani X-pipe with mac 5/8 longtubes + Am Thunder?
 

If you liked that Basani pipe, by all means keep the pro chamber! They sound MEAN. Kinda literally a screaming sound at speed, hard to describe, but you won't be disappointed. I read your thread title, and in my mind thought it was something you were going to buy. I was going to suggest the pro chamber instead, if you were willing to spend the extra bux.

Now given your situation, I DEFINITELY would keep the pro chamber.

Re: Mac prochamber or Bassani X-pipe with mac 5/8 longtubes + Am Thunder?
 

I'm totally sold on the prochamber now!

I'm all about bolting up the midpipe without resizing things.

Thanks guys! It actually looks like a huge catalytic converter from a distance so I could fool some ignorant cops in case I get pulled over.

Hmmmm, is this going to be easy to install? I mean do I need to wedge things together since the headers are now horizontal and I dont lift this into place anymore. I need to wedge this inbetween the mufflers and headers. Is it easy or a nightmare? I bet after installing longtubes, everything will look easy. :D

Re: Mac prochamber or Bassani X-pipe with mac 5/8 longtubes + Am Thunder?
 

It shouldnt be that hard since your catback is hung with rubber hangers, it will move with little problems. I know you wont be disappointed with the prochamber!!!