![]() |
1.6 roller rockers
I bought some 1.6 roller rockers and plan on putting them on soon. I was told that the increase in lift wouldn't be enough to worry about. I've got the Ford GT-40 crate motor with GT-40 iron heads and the E-303 cam(.498 lift). Is there any danger with putting the 1.6 roller rockers on as far as piston to valve clearance. I was told they would increase my lift by 30 thousands.
|
1.6 is the stock ratio... you mean 1.7's?
------------------ 84 convt,'95 302,AFR's, performer 3.55's, underdrives stock shorties stock cam, 1.7's 14.06@100.21, 255RWHP on a hot day 265 on the mph/weight chart |
Well I bought the 1.6 rockers. If they don't increase lift I guesss that's OK, or maybe I'll sell them and put the 1.7s on.
Is it the 1.7s that increase lift and could I safely put them on. Thanks for the info. |
shouldnt be a prob with the 1.7's.. probably not worth the extra $$$ though
------------------ 84 convt,'95 302,AFR's, performer 3.55's, underdrives stock shorties stock cam, 1.7's 14.06@100.21, 255RWHP on a hot day 265 on the mph/weight chart |
You might be getting confused with chevy. They use 1.5 stock ratio so 1.6 is a popular swap for more lift. Ford uses 1.6 stock (sb windsor motors) so 1.7 is then used for more lift.
|
I had a friend that ran the 1.7 Rockers in his 95 GTS with an F303 cam with no problems. I don't remember the lift of the F cam, but its supposed to be the most radical of the motorsport cams.
------------------ 2000 GT -- Black, 5sp, Mach460, Bassani CatBack & X-Pipe, MAC Cold Air, 70mm TB, Tri-Ax Shifter 1966 Mustang Coupe -- Tahoe Turquoise, Pony Int, A-Code, C4 Auto ------------------ scott@pearland.com |
If you already have the 1.6 I wouldn't buy another pair to go to 1.7. I don't think it would be worth the money.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 PM. |