|
Redline?!
Redline sorry dont know what it is! http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif
http://www-personal.engin.umich.edu/...ear%20pull.mpg |
Dat don't sound like no Mustang http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/wink.gif. Sounds good though.
Is that your car? ------------------------------- '79 Mustang Coup 4" Cowl Weld wheels (15x6;15x8) Stock 5.8L C4 w/ shift kit 1.5" MAC full length headers Holley 750 CFM Edelbrock intake 2.5" Off road H-pipe, 2-chamber Flowmasters 8.8" Rear end w/ 3.55 gears (Now that's more like it!!) http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif Front: 225/60/15 Rear: 255/60/15 Eagle GT II 14 x 4” K&N air filter (getting the Xtreme setup soon) http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/cool.gif "Red, thou art my companion. Hasten now your quickened metamorphosis to Green that I may conquer all who dare abide there beside me. May they be left thither behind burnt black." ---Fox Body |
Hummmm..something tells me I better get some gravy..LOL http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif
------------------ 2000 Mustang GT |
No its not my car!! http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif
The engine is a B16A2 (Civic SI) putting 196.5whp at the wheel N/A! Pretty impressive for a little 1.6L that produce ~135whp in stock form! Dont know what it run on the 1/4 it build for SoloII! Its a nice sleeper!! but its no way near FAST! http://albums.photopoint.com/j/View?...nce=0&res=high ------------------ 2000 Honda Civic SiR 15.368 @ 89.220 mph (stock) 1989 Ford Mustang LX Coupe 5.0L (RIP) 14.120 @ 98.126 mph |
WOW!! http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/eek.gif Thats impressive; I don't see a single sticker on it..LOL http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/tongue.gif
------------------ 2000 Mustang GT |
Yes, no stickers or jungle gym, very surprising! I think I see a little bumble bee nest down there though.....
|
Quote:
Peace! ------------------ 2000 Honda Civic SiR 15.368 @ 89.220 mph (stock) 1989 Ford Mustang LX Coupe 5.0L (RIP) 14.120 @ 98.126 mph |
ok....glad he made a reasonable choice! I still have little respect for those things, but that guy is one of the few exceptions.
|
|
Yes is in one of very few true import enthusiast(sp?)
Thats what the car is build for! SoloII! http://www.godspeed-motorsports.com/images/Chad1.gif NOTICE: the stickers are there for the sponsors during the SoloII event only! http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/biggrin.gif ------------------ 2000 Honda Civic SiR 15.368 @ 89.220 mph (stock) 1989 Ford Mustang LX Coupe 5.0L (RIP) 14.120 @ 98.126 mph |
This is a ricer by no means. http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/cool.gif But why the other guys got to go and mess up the reputaion? http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/confused.gif Oh well the world will never know.LOL http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/smile.gif
------------------ 2000 Mustang GT |
I doubt they make 135 hp stock at the wheels, probably closer to 125.
------------------ 1993 Mustang GT - March Ram Air & Pullies, K&N, C&L 73mm MAF, Super Competition Hooker Headers, 2 1/2 in. mandrel bent cat back, High Flow H-Pipe, Pro 5.0 Shifter, 16* Timing Advance |
Quote:
http://www.clubsi.com/photos/misc/jrsc_dyno.jpg |
Why are the dyno charts for hondas always bounce so badly? It looks like a heart monitor or something. No offence, Im just wondering.
|
No idea... but atleast its not going downhill after 4000rpm like ford engines! http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/wink.gif http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/tongue.gif
|
yeah, that's a good point K. the DOHC really helps it keep the power on up trhought the range. i was fairly impressed, until i saw the peak torque: 99.6!
i guess you can't get much more from a N/A 1.6L! poor cvcc's and then the supercharged cvcc on the second run? 177hp and 133ft-lbs.? not bad......but not what i'd call "good" either still, it's respectable, but not for a drag car. solo II yes. but that's driving around cones in a parking lot..... ------------------ If it ain't broke, make it go faster AOL: MCVillain45 |
Yep... there is no replacement for diplacement!!... but its not like this engine was into a 3000 lbs car!!! a Civic SI weight about ~2600 lbs so... with a good driver its good for mid to low 15s !! of course some dumbass cant break into the 15s! .... go figure!
And about the supercharged civic... its only with the supercharger... with the usual I/H/E its more around ~200whp! ------------------ 2000 Honda Civic SiR 15.368 @ 89.220 mph (stock) 1989 Ford Mustang LX Coupe 5.0L (RIP) 14.120 @ 98.126 mph |
I could never drive a car with more than a 6000rpm power band. That'd kinda freak me out! For what it is that is a very nice, clean car that is tastefully done. I'd always prefer my 4500rpm power band, though, but i'm from a different school of thought i guess. I wish my car was nice......
------------------ '84 Mustang 5.0 T5, FMS aluminum radiator & 180* thermostat, 1 5/8 shortys/2.5" duals, '88 GT tail lights and wheels, Holley 4160 4 BBL, smog pump idler, now with hi-po collapsed lifters in #3 or #4 :) |
Hehe, you guys think that's bad???
My 1st black 88LX Hatch 4banger A4LD's rev limiter was broken. Hehehe. Redline, 5400rpms, where I sent it? Past all the numbers right into where 7k would be. It got pretty rough about 6300, but then it smoothed out and it got quiet all the sudden? Oh well, by then it was time to shift, the tach wouldn't really go any higher. I actually ran the car past all the numbers for a continuous 10mi interval when D and OD went out on it, running 80mph down the freeway keeping up with my buddy. I can't believe it didn't blow up. BTW, the motor had 160k miles on it. Find me a Honda that can take that! |
Quote:
Man, I love V8's http://www.mustangworks.com/msgboard/smile.gif ------------------ Driving: 1998 F-150 Far way in Edmonton==> :( 1995 Mustang GT |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:43 PM. |