View Single Post
Old 01-07-2002, 01:53 AM   #13
Mach 1
Registered Member
 
Mach 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Georgia
Posts: 3,866
Default

Unit, I was under the impression the GT's wieghed considerably more than the LX's. Where did you get your info on the weight?

And why did they take the high back buckets away in 93?

You solved a great mystery for me, as I have a 93' GT which was fully optioned and wondered why I had the crappy low back seats. I swapped them for a set of older high backs from the bone yard.

As far as the computers being weaker, there seems to be differing opinions there. In one mustang book I have, a high performance tuner recommends the 93' computers as the best. I dont agree....but what do I know.

I can say from personal experience, when I swapped my 93' computer for an 89' vintage, It did seem to run a tad quicker, but nothing really that noticeable or that you would see a difference at the track with.
__________________
2002 GT
1993 GT (SOLD)
'93 Mustang GT
RHC member #142
Mach 1 is offline   Reply With Quote