It's not the worst Stang I've seen, but the worse part on it to me is the stupid sun shade rear window visor thingy. I have never saw a car that looks good with one of those on it, let alone on a Mustang. They look even worse on fox-bodies. Uggghhh!!!!
If thats your thing to put all that crap on your car for whatever the reason might be then fine, its a free country, but that also gives me the same right to laugh my ***** off at the sad attempt of "visual enhancement" made by the ricer. After all it is my retna's that are left burning from looking at the darn thing.
I'm glad people buy V-6's. I'll never own one, but it helps boost the sales numbers and keep the good ole' V-8 Mustangs rolling down the assembly line. That is a good thing, however, the problem is with the minority of V-6 owners that pretend their cars are fast. Most aren't. Yeah, there are the few and far between supercharged or nitrous equiped V-6's that put up respectable times, but I'd much rather spend my money on a V-8. You will get far better performance for your dollar and I have yet to hear a V-6 that sounds half as good a Mustang V-8 with an exhaust system on it.
Anyway back to the subject at hand. That thing is fugly.
__________________
1991 GT, AOD, Moroso Cold Air, 3.73s,
Pulleys, H-pipe, MAC Pro-Dumps,
FMS c-springs, and KYBs, A/c delete,
190 LPH fuel pump, 3-row radiator,
Maximum Motorsports full length subframes
2002 Oldsmobile Bravada(wife's car)
2005 Ford Taurus SEL (company ride)
GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS !!!!
|