View Single Post
Old 04-06-2001, 12:45 AM   #3
Stang_ROTY
Registered Member
 
Stang_ROTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Berkshire County - Massachusetts
Posts: 735
Post

Hey Smokedchevy!?

I got that issue and read it weeks ago...thanks! I've already had a 87 w a tired 5.0 bored .30 over, with equal length headers, 17 inch Chrome Cobra R's, and a H-pipe with Flowmasters on the street and I want more!

That is a great article! I read it weeks ago, and I see the many advantages of the 351W, especially the stronger & bigger mains, and rod to stroke ratio ;-)

The 93GT (with no motor or tranny) I bought can be made street legal once again. The problem lies where I must pass emissions on the 351W based 393. But I'm running Edlebrock Fuel Injection (Carb#'s on all parts), using cats, and am trying to find a smog pump so it shouldn't be too bad. The second problem is that the websites and phone numbers 5.0 Mag gave {at the end of the article) for FRPP are no good, so I can't talk to those guys. Thanks for the advice anyway!

------------------
In progress for Spring:

93 GT less motor and tranny, 8 pt cage, chute,
Sothside Machine bars & Sub-frames, 3.73's
'69 393 stroker Edlebrock Performer heads, Performer RPM Upper & Lower Manifold..Crane Gold 1.6 Rollers..BBK 70MM TB & cats..30lb Injectors..Cartech Fuel System..
Stang_ROTY is offline   Reply With Quote