MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums - View Single Post

Mr 5 0 · 03-05-2002, 03:49 PM

Idiotic statement for a car magazine editor to make - in public. He's probably just clueless as to what constitutes 'rice'.

There is a very wide chasm between those who own and drive Japanese cars and sport stupid accessories like fart pipes, garish paint jobs and pounds of 'racing' decals and those who own and drive American muscle cars and add accessories that increase or enhance actual performance.

This Matt King guy, as a car magazine editor, should be well aware of that obvious fact. I suspect he's the kind of guy that hates most anything that isn't in his particular ballpark, and that would seem to include Mustangs. Probably a '55 Chevy-type guy who doesn't think anything made after 1965 is any good, or else he just doesn't get out much.

Anyway, who reads Car Craft and who could possibly cares what 'Matt King' thinks?

03-05-2002, 03:49 PM	#6
Mr 5 0 Conservative Individualist Join Date: May 1997 Location: Wherever I need to be Posts: 7,487	Mustang Rice? Idiotic statement for a car magazine editor to make - in public. He's probably just clueless as to what constitutes 'rice'. There is a very wide chasm between those who own and drive Japanese cars and sport stupid accessories like fart pipes, garish paint jobs and pounds of 'racing' decals and those who own and drive American muscle cars and add accessories that increase or enhance actual performance. This Matt King guy, as a car magazine editor, should be well aware of that obvious fact. I suspect he's the kind of guy that hates most anything that isn't in his particular ballpark, and that would seem to include Mustangs. Probably a '55 Chevy-type guy who doesn't think anything made after 1965 is any good, or else he just doesn't get out much. Anyway, who reads Car Craft and who could possibly cares what 'Matt King' thinks?