View Single Post
Old 03-18-2002, 03:55 PM   #6
Chevyguy
Backyard Mechanic/Chemist
 
Chevyguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Acton MA USA
Posts: 435
Default

Some thoughts on runner length.

The stock 5.0 runners are VERY long. This helps torque production on a very oversquare motor ie 4.0" borex3.0" stroke. If I am not mistaken a typical carb 302 be it a Ford or Chevy likes tons of RPMs and does not have tremendous torque at low RPM's

Obviously you could never run fuel through a EFI 5.0 manifold it would certianly puddle out.

Without any actual data handy ( nice huh) I would imagine that the shortest EFI manifold runners ( victor JR?) is still longer than anything short of a tunnel ram for a carb motor, based on the upper vs lower manifold question.

So for EFI, shorter runner length loose torque gain airflow and higher rpm peak power.

For carb, gain runner length and also runner volume, gain airflow and peak power. But loose low rpm vac signal to the carb due to plenum volume.

The 8 butterflys probably is about the best setup, man that looks trick.

Ok my brain hurts now , gotta go
__________________
2001 Crown Vic Maurader Airbox/MAF, DR chip Edel IAS shocks Single exhaust :wtf:

93 P-71 Vic interceptor Backup car now

90 5.0 LX Notch SOLD

74 Chevy Laguna type S-3 454 under construction
Currently apart undergoing bodywork.
Chevyguy is offline   Reply With Quote