View Single Post
Old 04-02-2002, 06:56 AM   #4
WADS56
gear banger
 
WADS56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: CHICAGO
Posts: 1,144
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by PKRWUD
The '87-'88 Mustang 5.0 cam was part #E5ZE-AA, and the '89-'90 Mustang 5.0 cam was part #E8ZE-CA. They were very similar, but the E8 cam had 10 more degrees of duration for the intake valves (276 vs. 266). Obviously, that meant that the intake opening and closing points were different, as was the overlap. The lobe lift for both cams was the same for intake and exhaust (.278"). The less-aggressive "soft" lobe profile on the E8 cam, which was done to reduce valvetrain noise, reduced horsepower by about 3 hp.

Take care,
-Chris
That is some great info You will never feel 3hp on the butt dyno but it is still good to know. Where do you find this information? If you don't mind me asking.
__________________
79 Hatch: NA 347, Stage 2 Canfield Heads, Victor JR. Intake, Blueprinted Holley 750 HP, Solid Roller Cam, Shooting for 10's on motor
93 LX: Tremec, dual friction clutch, fms flywheel, Hedman shorties, O/R H-pipe
Ricer hater's club member #49
WADS56 is offline   Reply With Quote