View Single Post
Old 04-12-2002, 10:05 AM   #8
mustangman65_79
My poor 79 RIP
 
mustangman65_79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Suisun City,
Posts: 2,320
Default

Quote:
This isn't really a rice thinng but a guy at my school has a 68 chevelle with a 350 that he just had dynoed. It is making 242 at the rear wheels but the whole time he has been claiming 450 at the crank. I asked him if he was disappointed and he still said he should be making 450 at the crank! I was surprised at this remark because he seems to know a lot about cars and he built the motor himself.
Wow, 200 hp loss through the tranny, never heard of that-lol

I did mine on a comp, I think it was 320 engine-270 rear. This is what I was going to buy, but now I think I need a bigger cam, not too much though. it's for a 289.
__________________
'84 mustang GT turbo
'85 LTD
'89 Camaro Irocz z28
'94 Lightning
'96 Trans am
mustangman65_79 is offline   Reply With Quote