View Single Post
Old 04-24-2002, 03:25 PM   #22
wade73
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Mobile, Al
Posts: 108
Default

just a thought, but aren't the 5.0's actually 4.9's?? if memory serves, they were a cc short of being able to even round up to a 5.0....4949 to be exact...

the 4.6's have a higher redline and a flatter horsepower/torque curve. having just spent a week in a friends low mileage '95 4.9L, I would take my 4.6 anyday.

but this is kind of like arguing if you have a small penis or just really large balls dont you think?
__________________
98 GT - Usual

"Get in, sit down, shut up and HANG ON"
wade73 is offline   Reply With Quote