MustangWorks.com : Ford Forums - View Single Post

HORSEMEN RACING · 08-13-2002, 02:54 PM

Thought I would post a thread about the 2 most popular types of induction for Mustangs. First off I like them both they both have something to offer,but I like fuel injection reason being I like the torque of a fuelie,I like the cold start ability,and it makes killer power once it is tuned. The con of fuel injection is it is expensive,and can be a pain in the butt to tune and I hate the 6250 rev limiter that comes with the fuelie cars.

I like the high rpm power of a carburetted combo,sometimes you need that power on the big end of a drag strip,I like the cost,carbs are not too expensive,and they are somewhat easier to tune. The con of carbs is cold start,fuel mileage,and emissions if you live where the smog nazi's live glad I am originally from Texas.

Let's here some opinions on this.

08-13-2002, 02:54 PM	#1
HORSEMEN RACING Registered Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Camp Pendleton,Cali Posts: 95	NA Fuelie vs NA carburetor Thought I would post a thread about the 2 most popular types of induction for Mustangs. First off I like them both they both have something to offer,but I like fuel injection reason being I like the torque of a fuelie,I like the cold start ability,and it makes killer power once it is tuned. The con of fuel injection is it is expensive,and can be a pain in the butt to tune and I hate the 6250 rev limiter that comes with the fuelie cars. I like the high rpm power of a carburetted combo,sometimes you need that power on the big end of a drag strip,I like the cost,carbs are not too expensive,and they are somewhat easier to tune. The con of carbs is cold start,fuel mileage,and emissions if you live where the smog nazi's live glad I am originally from Texas. Let's here some opinions on this. __________________ OC "there are 5,000 Army troops sitting on their butts doing nothing,while 2 companies of Marines are securing this island" spoken by a Army General on the Isle of Grenada in 1983