I hate to prove you wrong, or imply you're wrong, but take a look at this benchmark test. Done by a MACINTOSH website. Unfairly pitting a single PIII vs a dual G4. Their basis of comment? It was unfair because of CLOCK SPEED. That meaningless thing. Oh, also threw in a single G4 450 vs it too. THe PIII kept right up with the dual G4 machine, and wasted the single G4. In Adobe Photoshop!!!
Again, this test was done by a Macintosh site. THe PIII used is an old school technology 1.0GHz non-tualatin processor.
http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/G4ZONE/ph...GHzPCvsG4.html
So I don't see how your pathetic 233MHz G3 could outrun a single G4 450MHz. Do you? If you do, do you think your G3 can take on and keep up with or (since you kill the 1.0GHz computers with your 233Mhz box) whoop a dual 450Mhz G4?
Of course not. My point about you blatently lying has been proved to well above my satisfaction.
Remember, the test was done by a Mac site, using Mac software! Hehehe, against an old school PIII of all things. I bet the new Tualatin, which roasts the old PIII would hang with a mighty dual G4 1.0Ghz.