View Single Post
Old 08-28-2002, 03:44 PM   #10
John Z
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 102
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by mustangman65_79
BTW, I thought I read somewhere that a 289 does have a smaller bore?
No both are 4.005 stock

Quote:
Also,a stock 289 vs a stock 302, the 289 has a higher compression ratio.
No, compression ratio is mostly determined by the heads, head gasket and shape of the top of the piston. From the Mr Fomoco page http://fomoco.com/index.asp?Dept=4&Tool=0
Disp Engine C/R
289 C 9.8 to 9.5 depending on year
289 A 10.3
289 K 10.5
302 F 8.5 to 10.0 (higher in early years, low in 73,72
302 J 10.5
HTH

Sorry that the spacing gets messed up when the message is posted. Hope you can follow the format.
__________________
68 coupe, 302 w/ Edelbrock performance parts, T5, 3.55 rear, needs paint!
John Z is offline   Reply With Quote