Thread: Damn Rices
View Single Post
Old 10-01-2002, 07:53 AM   #10
*Steeda90GT*
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: NJ
Posts: 297
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by this is not cbring
the newer sebrings must be faster........

i had a 1996 sebring v6..........164 horses stock and i added intake/exhaust.........

and i sure as heck didn't beat any preludes........

a vtec prelude when driven right (which is kinda rare) with a few light mods ought to be able to run with a STOCK 1994 gt
Ehh, I dunno....I ran a 14.6@96mph with my stock 94. I have yet to see a Prelude break out of the 15s. Maybe the ones Ive been seeing have idiots behind the wheel. But I would say that if BOTH were driven to the extreme, the 94 would have the edge, especially in the top end...
__________________
94 Oxford White GT. 17" Factory wheels with 275/40/17 Nitto Drag Radials. Vortech S-Trim, Anderson Power Pipe, 24lb injectors, T-Rex external, 190lph internal, 3.55s, 65mm TB, Pro M 77mm MAF, Pro 5.0 shifter, Saleen Gauges, Crane ignition, MAC longtubes, catalytic h-pipe, flowmasters.
*Steeda90GT* is offline   Reply With Quote