Quote:
Originally posted by Hammer
Are you one of the guys over at acura cl.com or something like that? I perused that board not too long ago....
Lots of posts about stock cl's (not cls's) beating 4.6 stangs.
Also,
Unless you were on a dyno and put each part on separately and then ran... How the heck can you state a cai gives you 10 rwhp? or a set of headers 30 rwhp?
You paid $1000.00 dollars for headers?!
You got me curious.... Not a flame....
I'd truly like to see a dyno of this 300 rwhp monster (or is it 260 to make up for the tranny loss?).... email it to me and I'll try to post it for ya....
|
the 260/232 number you see in my sig is the published crank number with 23% loss thats about 205 FWHP then add headers and intake and now stroked short block... i havent seen much of anybody saying a non type S cl could beat a 4.6 99+ GT ..but there are some people that just dont know this car over there and well cam sound stupid at times...a stock cl type S could hang with a 99+ auto vert GT until say 70 mph ...a modified cl-S H/E/I and tires (ours really suck and FWD is enough dissadvantage) CAN hang with a 99+GT manny lightly modded something like K&N and flowmasters we all know there's almost no limit to what can be done to the stang of any year really so ...just gotta choose your battles wisely