Quote:
Originally posted by The Deuce
I looked at all the pictures and didn't see a single domestic car they were talking about. Also, am I the only one who noticed the only car they didn't molest was the r34 (well except the neon lights)?
As for the technology being the only replacement for displacement. Why do their girlfriends love the rumble of my 8 so much? There are somethings you just can't do with 4.
|
Couldn't have said it any better.
I also have never heard of anyone going to the track and bragging about their MPG times, or their ECONOMiles per hour. fast is fast no matter how much fuel you consume. Really fast cars start sucking gas no matter if it's a 2.0L or a 8.1L engine. you need Air/Fuel to make power, the more you use the faster you go. I use my mustang for fun, not for mileage and although it may be "low tech" it still has more power and more potential/$$$ than most imports i can think of. Just my opinion though.
__________________
2005 Suzuki Hayabusa GSX1300-R
1980 Ford Thunderbird - 255 V8
ported heads, 5.0L ported stock headers, O.R. H-pipe and Flowmaster 2-chambers, dual roller timing chain
hi-po Mack Truck hood emblem 
1985 Mustang GT 5.0L T5, F-303, GT40p, headers, off-road h, flowmasters, MSD stuff, etc.
Sold 02/06/04 
1989 Mustang GT ET: 13.304@102.29 mph (5-24-03)
Sold - 1998 Mustang Cobra coupe, 1/4 mile - street tires: 13.843@103.41 (bone stock)
|