Quote:
Deuce,
What's wrong with Turbo Buicks? I think we can both agree they kick aŝŝ in the performance arena. I know there's debate regarding their looks, but that's a personal thing, and I'll never take offense to that. I think the GN looks mean as hel|.
|
I think they are great looking cars, never meant to say they were ugly or slow. Rather, its a comment on the unusual aspect of the car. Not many people think GN or GNX when they think muscle car. I know I didn't used to. People who have them (or know what they are) are usually passionate about performace and hardly leave them stock. That is where I was drawing comparison for the SVO cars. They aren't a typical mustang, and are a car that would have to be sought out to buy now, similar to the turbo buicks, or TTA's for that matter.
BTW, I haven't had a chance to ride in one. Heck, I think I've only ever seen 3 in my adult life. Wanna drive out here and take me for a spin?
__________________
1997 Mustang GT "The Freak" - 13.80 @ 101.70, 2.07 60'
1995 Honda VFR750 - not much @ really fast (actual data pending.)
1964.5 Mustang 289
Rice Haters Club Member #13