View Single Post
Old 11-18-2002, 06:25 PM   #12
vetteeatr
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Olney, Illinois, USA
Posts: 212
Default

well actually i kinda wanted more RPM so i could run more of a great handling car with 17s or so which we all know isnt gonan be able to take lots of low power down low. So i wanted to keep power lower in teh lower RPMs so i coudl kinda have a car that could fly but not have so much down low all i i do is spin. Its not gonna be a drag car and ill be runnign like 3.08's or something.

More of a top speed road racer but could still tear some stuff up on the drag strip.

Although if i wanted a drag car yeah i woudl go your route and jstu put some 15's wiht some slicks. and in reality i would probally actaulyl have soem cheap 15 inch rims wiht tires to bring to the strip when i wanted.

Maybe i dont understand all the power ranes but i assumed the farther up i moved the powerband the less traction porblem si woudl have down low.
__________________
!988 GT

World Windsor Sr.'s, Harland sharpe rockers, 3.73 gears, pulleys, no ac, hurst shifter, 10:1 pistons, BBK full length headers and H-pipe with flows.

Under extensive work for porting and fly cutting to accept my new cam and to match my soon to have systemax intake *DROOL*

Best E.T. 13.20 with edelbrock RPM intake and 70mm TB
vetteeatr is offline   Reply With Quote